Rubinstein 1938

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.03	38	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	40	0.05	45	0.05
Bacha 1997		45	0.14	39	0.00	46	0.06	41	0.06	43	0.06	35	0.06
Barbosa 1983		36	0.27	29	0.00	21	0.09	23	0.20	33	0.07	24	0.12
Biret 1990		38	0.26	20	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.14	46	0.05	29	0.08
Block 1995		4	0.50	19	0.00	5	0.19	4	0.59	20	0.54	3	0.56
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.24	40	0.00	40	0.10	26	0.10	28	0.08	26	0.09
Chiu 1999		21	0.38	41	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.17	42	0.06	25	0.10
Clidat 1994		23	0.35	16	0.01	28	0.06	39	0.06	49	0.05	43	0.05
Cohen 1997		26	0.32	27	0.00	34	0.09	28	0.09	37	0.07	28	0.08
Cortot 1951		32	0.30	7	0.02	13	0.13	21	0.24	26	0.09	19	0.15
Csalog 1996		29	0.31	35	0.00	33	0.08	29	0.08	40	0.06	34	0.07
Czerny 1990		20	0.38	23	0.00	18	0.13	15	0.43	46	0.05	18	0.15
Ezaki 2006		14	0.41	31	0.00	15	0.11	10	0.49	47	0.05	15	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		24	0.34	21	0.00	29	0.07	35	0.07	34	0.07	31	0.07
Fliere 1977		28	0.31	24	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.08	38	0.06	30	0.07
Fou 1978		6	0.48	9	0.01	9	0.12	9	0.50	25	0.17	6	0.29
Francois 1956		44	0.17	42	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.06	48	0.05	48	0.05
Grinberg 1951		43	0.19	11	0.01	44	0.07	34	0.07	45	0.06	37	0.06
Hatto 1993		39	0.25	49	0.00	41	0.09	27	0.09	48	0.05	32	0.07
Hatto 1997		41	0.23	44	0.00	42	0.08	30	0.08	49	0.04	36	0.06
Indjic 2001		35	0.27	50	0.00	37	0.06	40	0.06	49	0.05	44	0.05
Jonas 1947		27	0.31	43	0.00	30	0.06	36	0.06	33	0.07	38	0.06
Kapell 1951		31	0.30	6	0.05	36	0.06	37	0.06	31	0.07	39	0.06
Kiepura 1999		46	0.14	30	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.06	44	0.05	40	0.05
Kushner 1989		19	0.39	22	0.00	20	0.10	19	0.32	43	0.06	23	0.14
Luisada 1991		25	0.32	32	0.00	26	0.05	45	0.05	45	0.05	41	0.05
Lushtak 2004		11	0.43	14	0.01	17	0.11	17	0.40	35	0.10	11	0.20
Magaloff 1978		33	0.28	2	0.11	7	0.10	18	0.32	34	0.07	17	0.15
Meguri 1997		37	0.26	51	0.00	39	0.08	31	0.08	41	0.06	33	0.07
Milkina 1970		5	0.48	15	0.01	4	0.18	5	0.59	33	0.09	7	0.23
Mohovich 1999		12	0.42	36	0.00	16	0.11	12	0.46	46	0.06	14	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		48	0.03	45	0.00	49	0.04	49	0.04	48	0.05	50	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.39	10	0.01	12	0.12	14	0.43	45	0.06	16	0.16
Olejniczak 1990		34	0.27	18	0.00	35	0.06	44	0.06	49	0.04	47	0.05
Osinska 1989		7	0.45	25	0.00	10	0.11	7	0.56	46	0.06	12	0.18
Rangell 2001		9	0.45	13	0.01	6	0.23	8	0.54	23	0.36	5	0.44
Richter 1976		22	0.36	28	0.00	27	0.05	46	0.05	41	0.06	46	0.05
Rubinstein 1938		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.52	4	0.06	3	0.34	3	0.68	19	0.44	4	0.55
Rubinstein 1961		1	0.60	1	0.49	1	0.48	1	0.73	15	0.59	1	0.66
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.56	5	0.05	2	0.37	2	0.71	21	0.50	2	0.60
Shebanova 2002		30	0.31	17	0.01	31	0.07	33	0.07	49	0.04	42	0.05
Smidowicz 1948		16	0.40	46	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.24	23	0.23	9	0.23
Smidowicz 1948b		15	0.40	47	0.00	23	0.11	22	0.22	23	0.25	8	0.23
Smith 1975		42	0.22	34	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.06	26	0.10	27	0.08
Sofronitsky 1949		50	0.03	48	0.00	50	0.04	48	0.04	48	0.04	49	0.04
Sztompka 1959		8	0.45	3	0.06	8	0.11	16	0.42	32	0.08	13	0.18
Tomsic 1995		10	0.44	12	0.01	11	0.12	6	0.59	35	0.08	10	0.22
Uninsky 1971		18	0.39	8	0.02	19	0.18	13	0.45	45	0.05	20	0.15
Wasowski 1980		13	0.41	33	0.00	14	0.10	11	0.47	49	0.04	21	0.14
Random 1		49	0.03	26	0.00	48	0.04	50	0.04	4	0.51	22	0.14
Random 2		51	-0.01	37	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	46	0.03	52	0.02
Random 3		52	-0.04	52	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	42	0.05	51	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).