Kiepura 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		25	0.86	35	0.00	32	0.05	43	0.05	48	0.06	47	0.05
Bacha 1997		36	0.85	41	0.00	45	0.04	48	0.04	45	0.06	41	0.05
Barbosa 1983		1	0.93	5	0.06	6	0.29	3	0.59	23	0.16	5	0.31
Biret 1990		35	0.85	8	0.02	40	0.05	46	0.05	34	0.09	31	0.07
Block 1995		40	0.83	24	0.00	26	0.07	27	0.07	21	0.15	23	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		2	0.92	7	0.02	8	0.26	6	0.53	26	0.13	7	0.26
Chiu 1999		22	0.87	37	0.00	30	0.05	41	0.05	33	0.07	35	0.06
Clidat 1994		9	0.91	26	0.00	12	0.10	8	0.41	36	0.06	12	0.16
Cohen 1997		38	0.84	34	0.00	37	0.07	28	0.07	41	0.06	38	0.06
Cortot 1951		34	0.85	25	0.00	46	0.05	40	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.05
Csalog 1996		24	0.87	46	0.00	42	0.06	30	0.06	36	0.09	33	0.07
Czerny 1990		8	0.91	4	0.10	3	0.22	5	0.55	32	0.09	8	0.22
Ezaki 2006		11	0.90	13	0.01	9	0.19	7	0.48	46	0.05	16	0.15
Ferenczy 1958		19	0.87	21	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.16	48	0.05	26	0.09
Fliere 1977		32	0.86	28	0.00	33	0.06	38	0.06	44	0.05	43	0.05
Fou 1978		6	0.91	10	0.02	5	0.23	2	0.60	10	0.47	1	0.53
Francois 1956		20	0.87	43	0.00	39	0.06	34	0.06	44	0.06	40	0.06
Grinberg 1951		39	0.84	47	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.05	45	0.06	45	0.05
Hatto 1993		30	0.86	27	0.00	24	0.08	24	0.14	46	0.05	29	0.08
Hatto 1997		31	0.86	42	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.07	46	0.05	34	0.06
Indjic 2001		29	0.86	16	0.01	27	0.06	33	0.06	46	0.05	46	0.05
Jonas 1947		10	0.90	32	0.00	16	0.12	18	0.26	38	0.08	20	0.14
Kapell 1951		17	0.87	14	0.01	11	0.11	20	0.17	47	0.06	25	0.10
Kiepura 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1989		43	0.82	20	0.00	48	0.05	44	0.05	40	0.07	37	0.06
Luisada 1991		28	0.86	51	0.00	31	0.06	36	0.06	47	0.05	42	0.05
Lushtak 2004		21	0.87	48	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.16	48	0.04	27	0.08
Magaloff 1978		41	0.83	22	0.00	38	0.06	31	0.06	31	0.06	36	0.06
Meguri 1997		16	0.88	44	0.00	29	0.06	35	0.06	47	0.05	50	0.05
Milkina 1970		44	0.81	18	0.01	44	0.04	49	0.04	45	0.05	51	0.04
Mohovich 1999		37	0.85	6	0.03	13	0.10	21	0.16	45	0.06	24	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		18	0.87	15	0.01	21	0.09	19	0.19	36	0.07	22	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.81	52	0.00	47	0.06	37	0.06	33	0.07	39	0.06
Olejniczak 1990		7	0.91	12	0.01	14	0.09	13	0.33	39	0.08	15	0.16
Osinska 1989		26	0.86	40	0.00	18	0.08	12	0.34	20	0.23	6	0.28
Rangell 2001		46	0.77	30	0.00	49	0.07	26	0.07	39	0.07	30	0.07
Richter 1976		27	0.86	11	0.01	10	0.13	10	0.37	33	0.08	10	0.17
Rubinstein 1938		47	0.77	49	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.14	48	0.04	32	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.88	3	0.16	4	0.18	9	0.38	10	0.49	3	0.43
Rubinstein 1961		48	0.74	50	0.00	34	0.05	45	0.05	17	0.44	17	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.74	38	0.00	35	0.05	42	0.05	20	0.44	18	0.15
Shebanova 2002		4	0.92	1	0.23	1	0.23	1	0.61	18	0.30	2	0.43
Smidowicz 1948		14	0.89	19	0.00	20	0.15	15	0.31	37	0.08	14	0.16
Smidowicz 1948b		13	0.89	17	0.01	19	0.09	14	0.31	35	0.08	13	0.16
Smith 1975		42	0.82	31	0.00	36	0.06	32	0.06	14	0.50	9	0.17
Sofronitsky 1949		23	0.87	2	0.22	2	0.22	11	0.37	48	0.05	19	0.14
Sztompka 1959		3	0.92	9	0.02	7	0.19	4	0.56	18	0.30	4	0.41
Tomsic 1995		5	0.91	36	0.00	15	0.14	16	0.31	44	0.06	21	0.14
Uninsky 1971		33	0.86	33	0.00	43	0.04	47	0.04	39	0.06	49	0.05
Wasowski 1980		12	0.90	39	0.00	17	0.09	17	0.28	29	0.09	11	0.16
Random 1		50	0.02	23	0.00	50	0.02	51	0.02	39	0.04	52	0.03
Random 2		52	-0.10	45	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	21	0.13	44	0.05
Random 3		51	0.01	29	0.00	51	0.03	50	0.03	22	0.20	28	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).