Bunin 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		84	0.22	48	0.00	87	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03	84	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		6	0.50	13	0.00	4	0.15	4	0.62	34	0.33	4	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		48	0.37	49	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	25	0.29	37	0.11
Bacha 2000		53	0.36	15	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	32	0.28	34	0.12
Badura 1965		56	0.35	10	0.00	11	0.12	24	0.31	25	0.35	7	0.33
Barbosa 1983		7	0.50	16	0.00	6	0.17	6	0.58	64	0.06	19	0.19
Biret 1990		44	0.38	50	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	68	0.04	66	0.05
Blet 2003		51	0.36	11	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.16	25	0.25	15	0.20
Block 1995		72	0.30	12	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.04
Blumental 1952		36	0.40	25	0.00	47	0.05	59	0.05	55	0.06	65	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.46	17	0.00	10	0.12	10	0.52	44	0.11	14	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		65	0.32	51	0.00	78	0.06	48	0.06	74	0.04	57	0.05
Bunin 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987b		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Chiu 1999		69	0.31	52	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	61	0.05	69	0.04
Cohen 1997		70	0.31	6	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	28	0.20	42	0.10
Cortot 1951		86	0.21	53	0.00	86	0.03	87	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.03
Csalog 1996		37	0.40	54	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.14	68	0.04	50	0.07
Czerny 1949		11	0.47	35	0.00	22	0.06	17	0.36	57	0.07	26	0.16
Czerny 1990		42	0.39	55	0.00	41	0.04	40	0.11	64	0.05	51	0.07
Duchoud 2007		81	0.24	26	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	35	0.37	29	0.14
Ezaki 2006		12	0.47	27	0.00	14	0.12	11	0.48	51	0.06	23	0.17
Falvay 1989		10	0.47	36	0.00	9	0.14	9	0.57	41	0.21	6	0.35
Farrell 1958		66	0.32	56	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.37	18	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.06	64	0.05
Fliere 1977		16	0.45	57	0.00	15	0.15	15	0.41	53	0.05	28	0.14
Fou 1978		79	0.24	37	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02
Francois 1956		73	0.29	58	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	46	0.06	67	0.05
Friedman 1923		85	0.21	59	0.00	73	0.03	74	0.03	63	0.05	78	0.04
Friedman 1923b		87	0.20	60	0.00	72	0.03	86	0.03	61	0.05	76	0.04
Friedman 1930		76	0.29	3	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	36	0.23	32	0.13
Garcia 2007		57	0.35	28	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	38	0.24	41	0.10
Garcia 2007b		49	0.37	61	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.14	49	0.06	46	0.09
Gierzod 1998		13	0.46	62	0.00	36	0.07	31	0.21	68	0.04	44	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		4	0.51	38	0.00	5	0.16	5	0.61	16	0.49	2	0.55
Groot 1988		31	0.42	7	0.00	18	0.07	20	0.33	60	0.05	33	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		54	0.36	63	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.05	77	0.04
Hatto 1993		18	0.44	64	0.00	28	0.07	18	0.36	78	0.03	43	0.10
Hatto 1997		32	0.42	65	0.00	32	0.08	27	0.26	70	0.04	40	0.10
Horowitz 1949		22	0.43	4	0.00	21	0.06	35	0.16	12	0.49	11	0.28
Indjic 1988		23	0.43	66	0.00	29	0.09	19	0.35	62	0.04	35	0.12
Kapell 1951		15	0.45	5	0.00	24	0.06	28	0.26	46	0.10	25	0.16
Kissin 1993		74	0.29	39	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03
Kushner 1989		9	0.48	67	0.00	13	0.10	13	0.45	53	0.06	24	0.16
Luisada 1991		25	0.43	68	0.00	42	0.04	39	0.13	31	0.28	18	0.19
Lushtak 2004		29	0.42	69	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.47	42	0.19	10	0.30
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.51	40	0.00	3	0.24	3	0.70	26	0.42	3	0.54
Magaloff 1978		50	0.37	70	0.00	58	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.06	59	0.05
Magin 1975		26	0.43	71	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.11	65	0.04	49	0.07
Michalowski 1933		88	0.13	72	0.00	88	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.02	88	0.02
Milkina 1970		5	0.51	8	0.00	7	0.13	8	0.57	50	0.06	22	0.18
Mohovich 1999		17	0.44	41	0.00	16	0.13	16	0.38	43	0.11	17	0.20
Moravec 1969		24	0.43	29	0.00	35	0.07	30	0.21	57	0.06	36	0.11
Morozova 2008		30	0.42	14	0.00	30	0.06	22	0.32	42	0.11	20	0.19
Neighaus 1950		64	0.32	30	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.11	43	0.11	38	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.24	73	0.00	76	0.05	54	0.05	46	0.09	48	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.36	19	0.00	27	0.06	26	0.28	38	0.23	13	0.25
Osinska 1989		8	0.48	31	0.00	8	0.14	7	0.58	43	0.16	9	0.30
Pachmann 1927		77	0.27	20	0.00	61	0.04	73	0.04	50	0.06	62	0.05
Paderewski 1930		80	0.24	21	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	61	0.04	81	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.39	22	0.00	25	0.05	32	0.19	26	0.35	12	0.26
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.25	42	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	50	0.05	70	0.04
Poblocka 1999		45	0.38	74	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.04	68	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		19	0.44	75	0.00	23	0.06	21	0.32	60	0.05	30	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923		67	0.31	32	0.00	40	0.04	43	0.11	62	0.05	47	0.07
Rangell 2001		34	0.40	43	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.18	39	0.20	21	0.19
Richter 1976		60	0.33	44	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	64	0.04	72	0.04
Rosen 1989		55	0.35	76	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	48	0.06	55	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.29	77	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		63	0.33	9	0.00	74	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.35	78	0.00	67	0.03	75	0.03	30	0.26	45	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		38	0.40	45	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	32	0.24	27	0.15
Rosenthal 1931d		59	0.34	79	0.00	71	0.04	65	0.04	41	0.14	52	0.07
Rossi 2007		62	0.33	80	0.00	75	0.05	57	0.05	48	0.06	58	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		33	0.42	33	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.10	66	0.04	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.40	81	0.00	20	0.08	34	0.17	74	0.03	53	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.43	82	0.00	19	0.06	23	0.32	68	0.05	31	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.43	46	0.00	26	0.05	25	0.30	32	0.34	8	0.32
Shebanova 2002		20	0.43	2	0.00	17	0.08	14	0.41	27	0.32	5	0.36
Smith 1975		83	0.23	83	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Sokolov 2002		61	0.33	84	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	64	0.03	79	0.03
Sztompka 1959		71	0.30	34	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.03
Tomsic 1995		41	0.39	85	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.05	61	0.05
Uninsky 1932		68	0.31	23	0.00	77	0.04	68	0.04	53	0.05	74	0.04
Uninsky 1971		46	0.37	86	0.00	46	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.06	63	0.05
Wasowski 1980		43	0.38	87	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	71	0.05	56	0.05
Zak 1937		39	0.39	47	0.00	50	0.06	50	0.06	58	0.04	60	0.05
Zak 1951		28	0.42	24	0.00	33	0.07	29	0.25	69	0.04	39	0.10
Average		2	0.60	88	0.00	2	0.57	2	0.80	59	0.05	16	0.20
Random 1		90	-0.05	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	56	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		89	0.00	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	51	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		91	-0.06	91	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	66	0.03	91	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).