Rosenthal 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		20	0.42	50	0.00	21	0.15	22	0.46	23	0.40	14	0.43
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.34	69	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.13	80	0.03	42	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		41	0.35	42	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.12	61	0.03	43	0.06
Bacha 2000		47	0.33	70	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	55	0.04	45	0.05
Badura 1965		68	0.28	51	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	77	0.03	77	0.03
Barbosa 1983		28	0.39	26	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.30	65	0.05	28	0.12
Biret 1990		15	0.45	14	0.01	18	0.16	11	0.57	48	0.06	19	0.18
Blet 2003		33	0.37	27	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.35	57	0.05	24	0.13
Block 1995		42	0.34	78	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.38	62	0.04	29	0.12
Blumental 1952		7	0.50	15	0.01	7	0.24	7	0.68	25	0.47	7	0.57
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.30	59	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		5	0.58	6	0.02	6	0.50	5	0.80	6	0.69	6	0.74
Bunin 1987		66	0.29	79	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	82	0.03	78	0.03
Bunin 1987b		69	0.28	71	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	79	0.03	68	0.03
Chiu 1999		73	0.26	80	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	76	0.03	52	0.04
Cohen 1997		74	0.26	81	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	71	0.03	48	0.05
Cortot 1951		67	0.28	35	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	49	0.07	44	0.06
Csalog 1996		38	0.35	56	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.16	63	0.04	40	0.08
Czerny 1949		60	0.30	7	0.01	66	0.04	59	0.04	77	0.03	76	0.03
Czerny 1990		26	0.40	21	0.00	19	0.17	18	0.50	48	0.07	18	0.19
Duchoud 2007		85	0.17	82	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02
Ezaki 2006		32	0.37	46	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.13	71	0.04	41	0.07
Falvay 1989		35	0.37	72	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	69	0.04	53	0.04
Farrell 1958		43	0.34	47	0.00	50	0.04	57	0.04	61	0.05	54	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		19	0.42	39	0.00	23	0.07	25	0.39	57	0.06	20	0.15
Fliere 1977		8	0.49	24	0.00	11	0.17	15	0.52	73	0.04	21	0.14
Fou 1978		21	0.42	23	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.39	56	0.05	22	0.14
Francois 1956		63	0.30	57	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04
Friedman 1923		65	0.29	29	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	50	0.06	50	0.05
Friedman 1923b		58	0.30	16	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.05
Friedman 1930		50	0.32	62	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.23	46	0.07	25	0.13
Garcia 2007		84	0.18	73	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Garcia 2007b		71	0.27	37	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	81	0.02	79	0.03
Gierzod 1998		13	0.46	10	0.01	22	0.15	21	0.47	72	0.04	23	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.33	83	0.00	55	0.06	47	0.06	74	0.03	62	0.04
Groot 1988		10	0.48	30	0.00	9	0.15	8	0.67	22	0.30	11	0.45
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.38	64	0.00	24	0.06	29	0.36	78	0.03	38	0.10
Hatto 1993		16	0.44	84	0.00	20	0.13	20	0.48	79	0.03	31	0.12
Hatto 1997		22	0.42	85	0.00	29	0.13	24	0.40	77	0.04	26	0.13
Horowitz 1949		27	0.39	28	0.00	15	0.14	14	0.55	6	0.55	8	0.55
Indjic 1988		24	0.41	52	0.00	28	0.07	27	0.39	80	0.03	34	0.11
Kapell 1951		36	0.36	86	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.22	70	0.04	39	0.09
Kissin 1993		79	0.21	74	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.03	73	0.03
Kushner 1989		54	0.31	75	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	82	0.03	67	0.03
Luisada 1991		34	0.37	20	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.10	81	0.03	46	0.05
Lushtak 2004		31	0.38	17	0.00	26	0.07	23	0.41	82	0.03	35	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.34	53	0.00	52	0.06	45	0.06	76	0.03	57	0.04
Magaloff 1978		9	0.49	40	0.00	12	0.21	9	0.65	34	0.29	13	0.43
Magin 1975		18	0.43	76	0.00	31	0.09	34	0.29	71	0.04	32	0.11
Michalowski 1933		82	0.19	32	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.03	72	0.03
Milkina 1970		39	0.35	65	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	83	0.03	56	0.04
Mohovich 1999		17	0.43	36	0.00	27	0.07	30	0.35	57	0.04	30	0.12
Moravec 1969		11	0.47	54	0.00	10	0.22	10	0.59	27	0.35	10	0.45
Morozova 2008		75	0.24	31	0.00	79	0.03	72	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03
Neighaus 1950		48	0.32	33	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.20	44	0.09	27	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		40	0.35	12	0.01	13	0.13	17	0.51	6	0.46	9	0.48
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.32	58	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	80	0.03	71	0.03
Osinska 1989		53	0.31	67	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.03
Pachmann 1927		77	0.24	43	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	60	0.04	70	0.03
Paderewski 1930		87	0.14	68	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	73	0.03	83	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		78	0.21	63	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.02	80	0.02
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.21	87	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	81	0.03	81	0.02
Poblocka 1999		25	0.41	19	0.00	16	0.16	13	0.55	51	0.09	17	0.22
Rabcewiczowa 1932		12	0.46	11	0.01	8	0.17	12	0.56	24	0.34	12	0.44
Rachmaninoff 1923		6	0.56	8	0.01	5	0.39	6	0.77	3	0.73	5	0.75
Rangell 2001		83	0.19	9	0.01	88	0.01	87	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Richter 1976		29	0.39	13	0.01	33	0.08	32	0.31	71	0.03	36	0.10
Rosen 1989		49	0.32	44	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	81	0.03	60	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931		4	0.67	4	0.06	3	0.44	4	0.85	4	0.86	4	0.85
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.71	1	0.43	1	0.42	1	0.87	4	0.90	2	0.88
Rosenthal 1931c		2	0.70	2	0.20	2	0.44	3	0.85	4	0.87	3	0.86
Rosenthal 1931d		3	0.69	3	0.15	4	0.69	2	0.87	4	0.90	1	0.88
Rossi 2007		86	0.16	66	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	85	0.02	89	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		76	0.24	88	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		64	0.29	48	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.02	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.32	41	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	87	0.02	84	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.45	5	0.02	14	0.12	16	0.52	33	0.29	15	0.39
Shebanova 2002		72	0.26	45	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	80	0.04	59	0.04
Smith 1975		23	0.41	22	0.00	17	0.18	19	0.49	41	0.22	16	0.33
Sokolov 2002		55	0.31	89	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	66	0.03	65	0.03
Sztompka 1959		62	0.30	25	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	76	0.04	58	0.04
Tomsic 1995		81	0.21	90	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.02	82	0.02
Uninsky 1932		70	0.27	55	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.03	75	0.03
Uninsky 1971		37	0.36	60	0.00	35	0.09	35	0.28	76	0.04	33	0.11
Wasowski 1980		61	0.30	38	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	81	0.04	51	0.04
Zak 1937		59	0.30	77	0.00	75	0.05	52	0.05	79	0.03	55	0.04
Zak 1951		56	0.31	34	0.00	70	0.04	66	0.04	79	0.03	69	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.05	61	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	27	0.27	47	0.05
Random 2		88	0.04	18	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	21	0.31	37	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.01	49	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	34	0.17	61	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).