Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.48	63	0.00	56	0.06	59	0.06	4	0.57	53	0.18
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.59	5	0.09	7	0.15	9	0.61	8	0.63	11	0.62
Ashkenazy 1981		60	0.45	39	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	22	0.34	72	0.12
Bacha 2000		57	0.47	44	0.00	57	0.06	56	0.06	4	0.58	48	0.19
Badura 1965		51	0.49	64	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	4	0.57	47	0.20
Barbosa 1983		12	0.60	13	0.01	11	0.14	12	0.59	6	0.67	10	0.63
Biret 1990		24	0.57	6	0.04	9	0.19	11	0.59	1	0.69	9	0.64
Blet 2003		64	0.43	79	0.00	67	0.05	60	0.05	13	0.39	66	0.14
Block 1995		72	0.38	89	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	49	0.06	80	0.05
Blumental 1952		26	0.56	40	0.00	32	0.11	30	0.38	11	0.65	27	0.50
Boshniakovich 1969		18	0.59	46	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.57	3	0.67	12	0.62
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.48	42	0.00	55	0.06	55	0.06	33	0.34	65	0.14
Bunin 1987		44	0.51	68	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	7	0.57	54	0.18
Bunin 1987b		45	0.51	90	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.11	4	0.62	42	0.26
Chiu 1999		62	0.43	77	0.00	62	0.05	69	0.05	22	0.33	69	0.13
Cohen 1997		63	0.43	26	0.00	59	0.06	51	0.06	1	0.61	49	0.19
Cortot 1951		80	0.33	80	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	27	0.35	73	0.12
Csalog 1996		65	0.42	18	0.01	61	0.05	65	0.05	43	0.11	77	0.07
Czerny 1949		3	0.66	2	0.12	3	0.15	10	0.60	5	0.76	4	0.68
Czerny 1990		5	0.64	7	0.03	6	0.17	4	0.66	11	0.71	5	0.68
Duchoud 2007		78	0.35	65	0.00	74	0.05	64	0.05	16	0.52	62	0.16
Ezaki 2006		10	0.61	15	0.01	13	0.15	16	0.55	7	0.61	16	0.58
Falvay 1989		33	0.55	51	0.00	34	0.09	31	0.35	29	0.46	36	0.40
Farrell 1958		47	0.50	28	0.00	31	0.09	32	0.32	10	0.63	31	0.45
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.32	72	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Fliere 1977		11	0.60	25	0.00	21	0.08	17	0.52	5	0.60	18	0.56
Fou 1978		14	0.60	8	0.03	22	0.10	25	0.42	7	0.55	29	0.48
Francois 1956		50	0.49	56	0.00	51	0.06	54	0.06	1	0.63	50	0.19
Friedman 1923		75	0.36	29	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	19	0.47	74	0.12
Friedman 1923b		73	0.38	62	0.00	70	0.04	77	0.04	17	0.47	68	0.14
Friedman 1930		69	0.39	19	0.01	60	0.06	58	0.06	12	0.49	57	0.17
Garcia 2007		71	0.38	66	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	16	0.49	67	0.14
Garcia 2007b		55	0.47	43	0.00	24	0.08	35	0.27	10	0.58	37	0.40
Gierzod 1998		2	0.66	4	0.10	4	0.17	8	0.62	9	0.60	13	0.61
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.57	30	0.00	18	0.08	20	0.48	5	0.63	20	0.55
Groot 1988		37	0.53	73	0.00	38	0.08	40	0.23	6	0.54	40	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.64	10	0.02	5	0.14	13	0.58	11	0.62	14	0.60
Hatto 1993		21	0.59	81	0.00	29	0.17	23	0.46	9	0.59	24	0.52
Hatto 1997		17	0.59	74	0.00	28	0.11	22	0.47	8	0.62	21	0.54
Horowitz 1949		74	0.36	37	0.00	76	0.05	66	0.05	24	0.36	70	0.13
Indjic 1988		16	0.59	54	0.00	27	0.08	21	0.47	8	0.64	19	0.55
Kapell 1951		22	0.57	41	0.00	17	0.09	19	0.48	14	0.58	22	0.53
Kissin 1993		41	0.51	35	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.13	27	0.47	43	0.25
Kushner 1989		4	0.65	1	0.30	1	0.30	2	0.69	3	0.71	3	0.70
Luisada 1991		31	0.56	49	0.00	39	0.08	38	0.24	2	0.69	34	0.41
Lushtak 2004		43	0.51	14	0.01	25	0.09	27	0.40	15	0.53	30	0.46
Malcuzynski 1961		15	0.59	52	0.00	16	0.19	15	0.56	10	0.58	17	0.57
Magaloff 1978		34	0.54	23	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.24	4	0.64	38	0.39
Magin 1975		30	0.56	21	0.00	26	0.11	28	0.40	9	0.60	28	0.49
Michalowski 1933		84	0.31	69	0.00	78	0.04	71	0.04	4	0.61	61	0.16
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		13	0.60	20	0.01	15	0.12	7	0.63	1	0.72	6	0.67
Moravec 1969		38	0.53	32	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	20	0.46	44	0.22
Morozova 2008		8	0.62	17	0.01	10	0.23	3	0.67	1	0.78	1	0.72
Neighaus 1950		81	0.33	85	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.05	83	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		86	0.23	82	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.04	84	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.50	11	0.02	23	0.08	26	0.41	5	0.61	26	0.50
Osinska 1989		1	0.67	3	0.10	2	0.22	1	0.69	5	0.71	2	0.70
Pachmann 1927		76	0.36	75	0.00	79	0.05	62	0.05	28	0.34	71	0.13
Paderewski 1930		87	0.23	86	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	49	0.05	85	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.43	70	0.00	73	0.05	61	0.05	13	0.43	63	0.15
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.42	87	0.00	65	0.05	67	0.05	10	0.55	56	0.17
Poblocka 1999		28	0.56	31	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.26	23	0.46	39	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		58	0.45	57	0.00	52	0.08	45	0.08	27	0.31	58	0.16
Rachmaninoff 1923		70	0.39	47	0.00	68	0.04	78	0.04	43	0.10	78	0.06
Rangell 2001		54	0.47	88	0.00	58	0.06	50	0.06	15	0.52	55	0.18
Richter 1976		46	0.50	83	0.00	45	0.06	52	0.06	19	0.52	52	0.18
Rosen 1989		35	0.54	27	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.16	13	0.54	41	0.29
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.35	58	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	55	0.05	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.34	59	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	59	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.32	48	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	67	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.39	78	0.00	75	0.04	74	0.04	54	0.07	81	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.30	60	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	61	0.04	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		67	0.41	16	0.01	66	0.05	70	0.05	13	0.45	64	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		25	0.57	38	0.00	19	0.09	24	0.43	5	0.64	23	0.52
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.62	12	0.01	12	0.15	6	0.64	6	0.67	8	0.65
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.63	9	0.02	8	0.19	5	0.65	7	0.68	7	0.66
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.56	36	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.29	2	0.68	33	0.44
Shebanova 2002		56	0.47	67	0.00	63	0.05	68	0.05	40	0.16	75	0.09
Smith 1975		42	0.51	50	0.00	50	0.08	46	0.08	11	0.54	45	0.21
Sokolov 2002		36	0.53	24	0.00	40	0.09	39	0.24	2	0.69	35	0.41
Sztompka 1959		32	0.55	34	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.32	13	0.62	32	0.45
Tomsic 1995		40	0.51	55	0.00	47	0.06	53	0.06	11	0.55	51	0.18
Uninsky 1932		59	0.45	76	0.00	53	0.07	48	0.07	8	0.65	46	0.21
Uninsky 1971		19	0.59	33	0.00	20	0.09	18	0.50	4	0.70	15	0.59
Wasowski 1980		27	0.56	22	0.00	30	0.14	29	0.39	2	0.65	25	0.50
Zak 1937		49	0.50	61	0.00	54	0.06	57	0.06	21	0.42	59	0.16
Zak 1951		39	0.52	45	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	18	0.52	60	0.16
Random 1		89	0.00	71	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	17	0.37	79	0.06
Random 2		88	0.07	53	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	17	0.35	76	0.08
Random 3		90	-0.08	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	52	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).