Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		81	0.27	57	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.03	88	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.63	7	0.04	3	0.18	6	0.71	6	0.66	6	0.68
Ashkenazy 1981		79	0.28	77	0.00	81	0.04	71	0.04	73	0.03	84	0.03
Bacha 2000		64	0.37	74	0.00	54	0.05	64	0.05	33	0.25	53	0.11
Badura 1965		73	0.34	79	0.00	65	0.06	59	0.06	45	0.07	66	0.06
Barbosa 1983		10	0.59	19	0.01	9	0.12	7	0.67	11	0.63	8	0.65
Biret 1990		47	0.44	38	0.00	56	0.06	51	0.06	52	0.05	71	0.05
Blet 2003		65	0.37	52	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	52	0.06	70	0.05
Block 1995		36	0.49	4	0.05	18	0.10	29	0.41	16	0.49	28	0.45
Blumental 1952		39	0.47	80	0.00	48	0.06	55	0.06	39	0.17	54	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.49	43	0.00	36	0.12	35	0.35	41	0.13	43	0.21
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.41	63	0.00	64	0.06	58	0.06	56	0.06	62	0.06
Bunin 1987		44	0.45	51	0.00	61	0.10	45	0.10	27	0.26	50	0.16
Bunin 1987b		40	0.47	65	0.00	50	0.08	46	0.08	16	0.42	46	0.18
Chiu 1999		50	0.43	47	0.00	40	0.08	42	0.15	18	0.35	41	0.23
Cohen 1997		74	0.33	5	0.05	68	0.04	67	0.04	39	0.10	68	0.06
Cortot 1951		78	0.32	70	0.00	37	0.08	40	0.20	14	0.50	37	0.32
Csalog 1996		24	0.54	9	0.03	12	0.17	20	0.53	9	0.54	21	0.53
Czerny 1949		16	0.58	2	0.15	2	0.23	11	0.60	18	0.65	10	0.62
Czerny 1990		2	0.63	10	0.02	7	0.16	2	0.75	5	0.78	1	0.76
Duchoud 2007		71	0.35	62	0.00	66	0.06	53	0.06	24	0.44	49	0.16
Ezaki 2006		7	0.62	3	0.08	5	0.18	1	0.75	1	0.72	2	0.73
Falvay 1989		12	0.58	24	0.00	24	0.09	13	0.59	25	0.50	19	0.54
Farrell 1958		29	0.51	17	0.01	16	0.15	18	0.55	6	0.67	11	0.61
Ferenczy 1958		66	0.36	81	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	67	0.04	82	0.03
Fliere 1977		23	0.55	53	0.00	27	0.13	23	0.50	33	0.35	30	0.42
Fou 1978		22	0.55	16	0.01	21	0.08	22	0.51	10	0.50	24	0.50
Francois 1956		75	0.33	78	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	48	0.06	77	0.04
Friedman 1923		85	0.19	82	0.00	86	0.02	82	0.02	86	0.03	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		84	0.20	83	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		83	0.20	54	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	71	0.04	81	0.03
Garcia 2007		43	0.46	33	0.00	33	0.14	31	0.38	7	0.63	25	0.49
Garcia 2007b		27	0.53	36	0.00	20	0.11	21	0.52	4	0.67	13	0.59
Gierzod 1998		15	0.58	32	0.00	26	0.10	17	0.56	39	0.23	34	0.36
Gornostaeva 1994		20	0.56	14	0.02	19	0.10	19	0.55	4	0.63	12	0.59
Groot 1988		55	0.42	64	0.00	51	0.05	66	0.05	57	0.05	72	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.59	6	0.05	17	0.19	16	0.57	21	0.55	17	0.56
Hatto 1993		49	0.43	44	0.00	53	0.05	65	0.05	54	0.05	73	0.05
Hatto 1997		45	0.45	48	0.00	49	0.08	47	0.08	45	0.07	59	0.07
Horowitz 1949		86	0.18	66	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.03	86	0.02
Indjic 1988		48	0.44	71	0.00	52	0.04	68	0.04	50	0.05	75	0.04
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		30	0.51	39	0.00	35	0.10	36	0.30	26	0.47	33	0.38
Kushner 1989		8	0.60	8	0.03	4	0.20	10	0.61	13	0.55	15	0.58
Luisada 1991		62	0.38	84	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	68	0.04	78	0.03
Lushtak 2004		28	0.52	28	0.00	31	0.14	27	0.46	26	0.42	29	0.44
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.63	1	0.29	1	0.28	3	0.73	2	0.70	4	0.71
Magaloff 1978		42	0.47	21	0.01	57	0.07	50	0.07	47	0.07	57	0.07
Magin 1975		35	0.49	67	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.25	34	0.22	42	0.23
Michalowski 1933		87	0.15	68	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	45	0.05	80	0.03
Milkina 1970		17	0.57	20	0.01	15	0.12	14	0.58	19	0.48	20	0.53
Mohovich 1999		21	0.56	15	0.02	22	0.08	33	0.37	30	0.35	35	0.36
Moravec 1969		18	0.57	23	0.00	28	0.12	28	0.43	11	0.51	26	0.47
Morozova 2008		33	0.51	55	0.00	29	0.12	25	0.49	12	0.55	23	0.52
Neighaus 1950		77	0.32	85	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	68	0.04	85	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		80	0.28	56	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	38	0.13	65	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		60	0.40	25	0.00	58	0.06	56	0.06	67	0.04	69	0.05
Osinska 1989		13	0.58	49	0.00	14	0.16	12	0.60	22	0.55	16	0.57
Pachmann 1927		52	0.43	59	0.00	46	0.06	54	0.06	2	0.66	44	0.20
Paderewski 1930		82	0.23	86	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	65	0.04	79	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		67	0.36	29	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	49	0.06	74	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		63	0.38	45	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.17	9	0.55	38	0.31
Poblocka 1999		5	0.63	22	0.01	8	0.15	4	0.72	1	0.74	3	0.73
Rabcewiczowa 1932		19	0.57	50	0.00	13	0.13	15	0.58	1	0.59	14	0.58
Rachmaninoff 1923		61	0.38	69	0.00	59	0.06	57	0.06	45	0.07	63	0.06
Rangell 2001		41	0.47	18	0.01	45	0.08	48	0.08	25	0.39	47	0.18
Richter 1976		14	0.58	27	0.00	10	0.13	9	0.65	2	0.72	5	0.68
Rosen 1989		46	0.45	75	0.00	55	0.06	61	0.06	46	0.06	67	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.36	87	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	37	0.22	56	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		68	0.36	46	0.00	74	0.04	69	0.04	41	0.12	58	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.32	72	0.00	79	0.04	72	0.04	47	0.05	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		58	0.40	30	0.00	62	0.07	49	0.07	30	0.24	51	0.13
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.35	73	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	39	0.17	61	0.07
Rossi 2007		51	0.43	37	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	6	0.54	39	0.24
Rubinstein 1939		26	0.53	42	0.00	30	0.14	24	0.50	11	0.54	22	0.52
Rubinstein 1952		6	0.63	34	0.00	11	0.15	8	0.67	10	0.62	9	0.64
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.64	13	0.02	6	0.15	5	0.71	10	0.66	7	0.68
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.43	60	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.15	35	0.26	45	0.20
Shebanova 2002		72	0.35	61	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	70	0.04	83	0.03
Smith 1975		59	0.40	41	0.00	63	0.05	62	0.05	46	0.08	64	0.06
Sokolov 2002		57	0.41	31	0.00	60	0.06	52	0.06	36	0.26	52	0.12
Sztompka 1959		37	0.49	76	0.00	41	0.08	39	0.20	20	0.53	36	0.33
Tomsic 1995		11	0.58	11	0.02	23	0.10	26	0.48	4	0.63	18	0.55
Uninsky 1932		53	0.43	40	0.00	47	0.06	60	0.06	24	0.49	48	0.17
Uninsky 1971		32	0.51	35	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.20	36	0.30	40	0.24
Wasowski 1980		25	0.54	12	0.02	32	0.13	30	0.41	18	0.49	27	0.45
Zak 1937		34	0.50	26	0.00	34	0.13	34	0.36	24	0.41	32	0.38
Zak 1951		31	0.51	58	0.00	25	0.09	32	0.38	24	0.40	31	0.39
Random 1		88	0.04	88	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	3	0.53	55	0.10
Random 2		89	0.00	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	48	0.04	87	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.01	90	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	3	0.54	60	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).