Harasiewicz 1955

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		59	0.42	48	0.00	64	0.05	56	0.05	24	0.39	54	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.61	8	0.01	19	0.15	15	0.60	10	0.61	16	0.60
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.40	29	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	33	0.23	68	0.10
Bacha 2000		76	0.36	38	0.00	80	0.04	65	0.04	38	0.22	71	0.09
Badura 1965		55	0.44	49	0.00	57	0.07	49	0.07	23	0.35	51	0.16
Barbosa 1983		6	0.66	14	0.01	6	0.17	6	0.66	5	0.68	9	0.67
Biret 1990		36	0.53	44	0.00	33	0.11	31	0.42	25	0.42	37	0.42
Blet 2003		60	0.41	69	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	46	0.07	80	0.05
Block 1995		53	0.46	12	0.01	55	0.05	64	0.05	25	0.35	56	0.13
Blumental 1952		32	0.55	32	0.00	32	0.09	30	0.43	18	0.55	29	0.49
Boshniakovich 1969		27	0.57	39	0.00	20	0.15	17	0.57	10	0.53	24	0.55
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.49	13	0.01	48	0.07	48	0.07	32	0.38	48	0.16
Bunin 1987		77	0.36	74	0.00	83	0.05	63	0.05	69	0.04	85	0.04
Bunin 1987b		78	0.35	80	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	54	0.05	82	0.04
Chiu 1999		62	0.41	84	0.00	73	0.03	87	0.03	43	0.13	79	0.06
Cohen 1997		74	0.37	23	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	26	0.20	73	0.09
Cortot 1951		61	0.41	22	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	10	0.58	45	0.19
Csalog 1996		51	0.46	57	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	27	0.32	52	0.15
Czerny 1949		4	0.67	5	0.03	5	0.37	9	0.64	4	0.77	6	0.70
Czerny 1990		1	0.74	1	0.55	1	0.55	1	0.84	1	0.86	1	0.85
Duchoud 2007		87	0.17	85	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	75	0.03	89	0.03
Ezaki 2006		7	0.64	11	0.01	12	0.11	14	0.61	9	0.60	14	0.60
Falvay 1989		12	0.62	26	0.00	21	0.15	16	0.60	17	0.58	17	0.59
Farrell 1958		43	0.50	35	0.00	38	0.10	36	0.36	18	0.53	35	0.44
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.48	60	0.00	49	0.06	50	0.06	23	0.48	47	0.17
Fliere 1977		23	0.58	46	0.00	29	0.09	26	0.50	22	0.44	33	0.47
Fou 1978		10	0.63	64	0.00	9	0.15	7	0.66	1	0.70	8	0.68
Francois 1956		66	0.39	81	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	32	0.25	62	0.11
Friedman 1923		75	0.37	51	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	29	0.31	70	0.10
Friedman 1923b		69	0.38	61	0.00	69	0.03	84	0.03	22	0.40	60	0.11
Friedman 1930		67	0.39	62	0.00	70	0.04	75	0.04	34	0.24	65	0.10
Garcia 2007		79	0.35	67	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	30	0.34	57	0.12
Garcia 2007b		57	0.44	15	0.01	44	0.08	44	0.15	18	0.47	43	0.27
Gierzod 1998		2	0.71	2	0.11	2	0.31	2	0.82	2	0.81	2	0.81
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.54	75	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	30	0.34	53	0.15
Groot 1988		71	0.38	70	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.05	81	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		11	0.62	36	0.00	8	0.17	5	0.67	4	0.73	7	0.70
Hatto 1997		15	0.60	65	0.00	14	0.09	10	0.63	7	0.67	11	0.65
Horowitz 1949		84	0.31	45	0.00	81	0.03	86	0.03	50	0.06	83	0.04
Indjic 1988		14	0.60	34	0.00	18	0.13	12	0.62	6	0.69	10	0.65
Kapell 1951		17	0.59	7	0.02	22	0.13	21	0.55	16	0.57	22	0.56
Kissin 1993		8	0.64	9	0.01	10	0.12	8	0.64	1	0.79	5	0.71
Kushner 1989		19	0.59	37	0.00	15	0.10	20	0.56	18	0.50	26	0.53
Luisada 1991		54	0.44	68	0.00	68	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.04	86	0.03
Lushtak 2004		18	0.59	17	0.00	23	0.14	13	0.61	6	0.64	13	0.62
Malcuzynski 1961		16	0.60	18	0.00	16	0.09	19	0.57	13	0.55	23	0.56
Magaloff 1978		34	0.54	31	0.00	36	0.08	38	0.32	9	0.56	36	0.42
Magin 1975		31	0.55	20	0.00	37	0.09	35	0.38	18	0.51	34	0.44
Michalowski 1933		86	0.22	40	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	46	0.04	87	0.03
Milkina 1970		9	0.64	52	0.00	7	0.22	11	0.62	13	0.58	15	0.60
Mohovich 1999		41	0.51	71	0.00	41	0.09	42	0.21	32	0.27	44	0.24
Moravec 1969		28	0.57	24	0.00	34	0.11	34	0.40	9	0.57	30	0.48
Morozova 2008		45	0.48	66	0.00	47	0.08	45	0.08	24	0.38	46	0.17
Neighaus 1950		65	0.39	72	0.00	79	0.05	62	0.05	33	0.22	69	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		81	0.33	63	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	32	0.20	72	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.47	78	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	29	0.36	55	0.13
Osinska 1989		3	0.70	4	0.06	3	0.33	3	0.79	3	0.77	3	0.78
Pachmann 1927		82	0.33	86	0.00	84	0.04	70	0.04	40	0.14	76	0.07
Paderewski 1930		85	0.23	87	0.00	85	0.04	67	0.04	52	0.05	84	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		64	0.40	82	0.00	66	0.04	74	0.04	33	0.25	63	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.42	56	0.00	51	0.05	61	0.05	11	0.54	50	0.16
Poblocka 1999		21	0.59	79	0.00	30	0.11	28	0.47	16	0.50	31	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.47	10	0.01	24	0.12	37	0.34	9	0.48	38	0.40
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.44	73	0.00	56	0.06	51	0.06	38	0.21	59	0.11
Rangell 2001		39	0.52	28	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.24	7	0.60	39	0.38
Richter 1976		29	0.55	53	0.00	26	0.12	33	0.41	18	0.56	32	0.48
Rosen 1989		48	0.47	50	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	43	0.19	67	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.38	58	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	29	0.36	66	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		72	0.37	43	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	29	0.34	64	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.33	88	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	26	0.33	61	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.38	76	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	39	0.18	78	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.32	89	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	35	0.22	74	0.09
Rossi 2007		73	0.37	47	0.00	62	0.05	60	0.05	33	0.23	58	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		37	0.53	41	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.45	9	0.55	27	0.50
Rubinstein 1952		25	0.57	16	0.01	17	0.11	18	0.57	20	0.51	25	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		5	0.66	3	0.09	4	0.34	4	0.72	5	0.72	4	0.72
Schilhawsky 1960		33	0.54	30	0.00	39	0.10	39	0.27	26	0.42	40	0.34
Shebanova 2002		52	0.46	25	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	43	0.12	75	0.08
Smith 1975		38	0.52	33	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.16	17	0.47	42	0.27
Sokolov 2002		49	0.47	83	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	12	0.51	49	0.16
Sztompka 1959		20	0.59	55	0.00	11	0.11	23	0.54	11	0.63	19	0.58
Tomsic 1995		40	0.52	27	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.21	18	0.47	41	0.31
Uninsky 1932		42	0.51	19	0.00	13	0.10	22	0.54	1	0.75	12	0.64
Uninsky 1971		26	0.57	54	0.00	27	0.12	27	0.49	5	0.66	20	0.57
Wasowski 1980		22	0.58	21	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.52	4	0.61	21	0.56
Zak 1937		24	0.58	6	0.02	28	0.10	24	0.53	6	0.66	18	0.59
Zak 1951		30	0.55	42	0.00	35	0.12	32	0.41	11	0.59	28	0.49
Random 1		89	-0.04	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	59	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	0.04	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	43	0.07	88	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.07	59	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	25	0.25	77	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).