Garcia 2007b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		62	0.33	50	0.00	69	0.05	65	0.05	57	0.04	70	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		42	0.39	17	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.38	43	0.13	31	0.22
Ashkenazy 1981		78	0.24	77	0.00	80	0.02	88	0.02	70	0.03	88	0.02
Bacha 2000		74	0.27	78	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	65	0.03	72	0.03
Badura 1965		65	0.29	59	0.00	63	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.05	64	0.05
Barbosa 1983		57	0.35	15	0.00	29	0.08	35	0.27	53	0.08	40	0.15
Biret 1990		41	0.39	81	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.31	54	0.05	42	0.12
Blet 2003		66	0.29	62	0.00	70	0.04	74	0.04	72	0.03	79	0.03
Block 1995		85	0.20	69	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.03	86	0.02
Blumental 1952		60	0.33	82	0.00	67	0.04	76	0.04	78	0.04	71	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.39	70	0.00	17	0.08	24	0.41	54	0.06	35	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		70	0.28	34	0.00	66	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.03	73	0.03
Bunin 1987		48	0.37	23	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	36	0.14	47	0.09
Bunin 1987b		47	0.37	27	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	35	0.19	43	0.11
Chiu 1999		43	0.38	20	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.12	33	0.20	36	0.15
Cohen 1997		20	0.44	7	0.01	16	0.09	27	0.35	2	0.59	11	0.45
Cortot 1951		83	0.22	60	0.00	62	0.05	66	0.05	54	0.06	66	0.05
Csalog 1996		51	0.37	28	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	61	0.05	56	0.06
Czerny 1949		30	0.41	64	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.32	40	0.18	30	0.24
Czerny 1990		32	0.40	87	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.20	60	0.05	45	0.10
Duchoud 2007		53	0.36	58	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	12	0.54	34	0.16
Ezaki 2006		40	0.39	29	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	51	0.06	52	0.06
Falvay 1989		17	0.45	54	0.00	28	0.09	22	0.43	53	0.05	37	0.15
Farrell 1958		13	0.47	38	0.00	9	0.17	12	0.58	15	0.56	7	0.57
Ferenczy 1958		68	0.28	52	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.03	80	0.03
Fliere 1977		12	0.47	39	0.00	19	0.09	21	0.44	44	0.10	32	0.21
Fou 1978		46	0.37	47	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	73	0.04	67	0.04
Francois 1956		36	0.39	45	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.28	10	0.48	18	0.37
Friedman 1923		71	0.27	16	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	70	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		73	0.27	35	0.00	74	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.05	65	0.05
Friedman 1930		49	0.37	13	0.01	52	0.05	63	0.05	43	0.15	46	0.09
Garcia 2007		1	0.69	1	0.72	1	0.71	1	0.86	1	0.88	1	0.87
Garcia 2007b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gierzod 1998		14	0.47	42	0.00	31	0.08	28	0.33	70	0.04	44	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		4	0.52	8	0.01	6	0.18	5	0.65	11	0.56	5	0.60
Groot 1988		34	0.40	4	0.03	15	0.10	25	0.38	27	0.26	23	0.31
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.44	31	0.00	20	0.09	18	0.47	44	0.15	27	0.27
Hatto 1993		29	0.41	66	0.00	22	0.07	17	0.48	36	0.23	21	0.33
Hatto 1997		24	0.43	71	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.56	35	0.31	13	0.42
Horowitz 1949		79	0.24	79	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	57	0.05	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		31	0.41	32	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.51	35	0.27	17	0.37
Kapell 1951		2	0.53	12	0.01	5	0.18	4	0.67	21	0.52	6	0.59
Kissin 1993		64	0.30	72	0.00	65	0.05	67	0.05	74	0.04	68	0.04
Kushner 1989		15	0.46	21	0.00	12	0.17	8	0.60	41	0.24	16	0.38
Luisada 1991		61	0.33	83	0.00	68	0.05	68	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.05
Lushtak 2004		23	0.43	57	0.00	27	0.13	20	0.46	38	0.24	19	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.45	33	0.00	24	0.09	15	0.51	43	0.16	24	0.29
Magaloff 1978		44	0.38	19	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.12	44	0.13	41	0.12
Magin 1975		5	0.51	3	0.03	7	0.16	3	0.68	11	0.58	4	0.63
Michalowski 1933		87	0.15	55	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		11	0.47	5	0.03	10	0.18	10	0.58	35	0.27	15	0.40
Mohovich 1999		16	0.45	88	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.42	39	0.18	26	0.27
Moravec 1969		26	0.43	53	0.00	53	0.05	64	0.05	45	0.09	50	0.07
Morozova 2008		45	0.37	37	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.18	37	0.16	33	0.17
Neighaus 1950		77	0.24	89	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.02	90	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		86	0.18	56	0.00	87	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		59	0.33	43	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.14	41	0.17	39	0.15
Osinska 1989		8	0.49	22	0.00	3	0.22	7	0.62	32	0.44	9	0.52
Pachmann 1927		63	0.32	11	0.01	37	0.10	39	0.18	24	0.38	28	0.26
Paderewski 1930		69	0.28	90	0.00	58	0.05	62	0.05	13	0.43	38	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		33	0.40	36	0.00	35	0.08	36	0.23	14	0.42	22	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008		9	0.48	18	0.00	8	0.15	13	0.58	2	0.72	2	0.65
Poblocka 1999		56	0.35	84	0.00	60	0.05	55	0.05	67	0.05	58	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		10	0.48	9	0.01	13	0.13	9	0.59	23	0.34	10	0.45
Rachmaninoff 1923		67	0.29	85	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	48	0.06	59	0.05
Rangell 2001		27	0.42	67	0.00	21	0.08	33	0.30	29	0.36	20	0.33
Richter 1976		55	0.35	41	0.00	56	0.06	53	0.06	46	0.06	55	0.06
Rosen 1989		28	0.42	49	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.11	48	0.06	49	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.27	40	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	63	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.22	73	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.04	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.23	65	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	76	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.25	80	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.24	86	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.03	89	0.02
Rossi 2007		7	0.50	10	0.01	4	0.13	11	0.58	2	0.70	3	0.64
Rubinstein 1939		25	0.43	25	0.00	23	0.08	19	0.47	27	0.35	14	0.41
Rubinstein 1952		6	0.50	6	0.02	11	0.14	6	0.62	32	0.31	12	0.44
Rubinstein 1966		3	0.52	2	0.04	2	0.24	2	0.69	29	0.45	8	0.56
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.35	24	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	45	0.06	62	0.05
Shebanova 2002		39	0.39	51	0.00	54	0.06	51	0.06	54	0.05	63	0.05
Smith 1975		50	0.37	26	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	49	0.07	53	0.06
Sokolov 2002		80	0.24	75	0.00	72	0.05	61	0.05	79	0.02	74	0.03
Sztompka 1959		58	0.34	61	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	56	0.05	61	0.05
Tomsic 1995		21	0.44	14	0.01	32	0.08	29	0.33	30	0.26	25	0.29
Uninsky 1932		75	0.25	63	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	67	0.04	69	0.04
Uninsky 1971		38	0.39	68	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.11	52	0.06	48	0.08
Wasowski 1980		19	0.44	48	0.00	33	0.08	32	0.31	39	0.18	29	0.24
Zak 1937		52	0.36	46	0.00	61	0.07	45	0.07	53	0.05	54	0.06
Zak 1951		37	0.39	44	0.00	49	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.05	60	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.10	74	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	57	0.04	87	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.05	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.03	85	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.01	30	0.00	88	0.02	84	0.02	26	0.24	51	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).