Friedman 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		28	0.36	18	0.00	15	0.08	13	0.48	12	0.48	7	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.31	56	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	73	0.03	66	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		39	0.33	13	0.01	28	0.07	23	0.37	15	0.43	9	0.40
Bacha 2000		85	0.15	82	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.03	69	0.03
Badura 1965		40	0.33	14	0.01	43	0.06	40	0.17	48	0.07	40	0.11
Barbosa 1983		46	0.32	46	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.17	59	0.07	39	0.11
Biret 1990		7	0.43	28	0.00	6	0.14	7	0.58	53	0.05	20	0.17
Blet 2003		63	0.26	65	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	80	0.03	79	0.03
Block 1995		75	0.24	89	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	69	0.04	67	0.04
Blumental 1952		32	0.35	38	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.38	58	0.06	24	0.15
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.38	66	0.00	38	0.08	32	0.25	78	0.03	44	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		45	0.32	15	0.01	34	0.06	39	0.20	49	0.07	34	0.12
Bunin 1987		55	0.29	21	0.00	31	0.07	35	0.23	45	0.07	32	0.13
Bunin 1987b		72	0.25	83	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.14	58	0.05	47	0.08
Chiu 1999		19	0.38	7	0.02	21	0.07	31	0.26	61	0.05	38	0.11
Cohen 1997		73	0.25	57	0.00	52	0.07	49	0.07	44	0.08	48	0.07
Cortot 1951		87	0.00	84	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	90	0.01	90	0.01
Csalog 1996		51	0.31	17	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	69	0.04	55	0.05
Czerny 1949		64	0.26	61	0.00	74	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.02	86	0.02
Czerny 1990		10	0.42	47	0.00	18	0.08	21	0.42	56	0.05	25	0.14
Duchoud 2007		61	0.27	24	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	44	0.15	43	0.09
Ezaki 2006		66	0.26	73	0.00	66	0.03	75	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.03
Falvay 1989		6	0.43	52	0.00	7	0.15	8	0.57	50	0.05	18	0.17
Farrell 1958		67	0.26	85	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.05	63	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		44	0.32	22	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.07	51	0.06
Fliere 1977		30	0.36	74	0.00	47	0.06	57	0.06	72	0.05	53	0.05
Fou 1978		56	0.28	27	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	73	0.03
Francois 1956		38	0.33	34	0.00	20	0.06	30	0.28	33	0.25	16	0.26
Friedman 1923		2	0.62	2	0.18	2	0.70	1	0.85	2	0.84	1	0.84
Friedman 1923b		1	0.63	1	0.58	1	0.57	2	0.82	2	0.83	2	0.82
Friedman 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007		54	0.29	58	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	62	0.04	82	0.03
Garcia 2007b		25	0.37	19	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.15	63	0.05	46	0.09
Gierzod 1998		8	0.43	31	0.00	10	0.11	11	0.52	57	0.05	22	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		18	0.38	48	0.00	33	0.06	29	0.30	47	0.06	33	0.13
Groot 1988		29	0.36	39	0.00	23	0.06	16	0.46	76	0.04	26	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.39	42	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.24	75	0.04	42	0.10
Hatto 1993		14	0.40	75	0.00	11	0.11	10	0.52	52	0.05	23	0.16
Hatto 1997		22	0.38	20	0.00	25	0.07	19	0.43	79	0.04	30	0.13
Horowitz 1949		47	0.31	62	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.20	10	0.50	12	0.32
Indjic 1988		24	0.37	29	0.00	22	0.06	18	0.44	75	0.04	29	0.13
Kapell 1951		82	0.20	63	0.00	83	0.04	71	0.04	83	0.02	74	0.03
Kissin 1993		80	0.21	86	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.04	77	0.03
Kushner 1989		26	0.37	11	0.01	35	0.06	28	0.30	64	0.05	36	0.12
Luisada 1991		34	0.35	44	0.00	26	0.08	17	0.46	28	0.31	10	0.38
Lushtak 2004		31	0.36	67	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	68	0.04	52	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		60	0.27	50	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.02	84	0.02
Magaloff 1978		59	0.27	79	0.00	59	0.06	54	0.06	74	0.03	61	0.04
Magin 1975		9	0.42	5	0.03	8	0.14	6	0.59	40	0.15	15	0.30
Michalowski 1933		79	0.21	37	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	36	0.14	50	0.06
Milkina 1970		15	0.39	9	0.01	13	0.12	12	0.49	58	0.06	19	0.17
Mohovich 1999		35	0.35	30	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.24	70	0.04	41	0.10
Moravec 1969		62	0.27	69	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.03	70	0.03
Morozova 2008		76	0.24	80	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Neighaus 1950		33	0.35	16	0.00	30	0.07	42	0.15	29	0.26	17	0.20
Niedzielski 1931		53	0.29	8	0.01	14	0.07	26	0.32	16	0.40	11	0.36
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.38	49	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.31	49	0.05	37	0.12
Osinska 1989		13	0.40	51	0.00	19	0.07	24	0.36	65	0.05	28	0.13
Pachmann 1927		81	0.21	35	0.00	84	0.04	74	0.04	65	0.03	76	0.03
Paderewski 1930		83	0.19	43	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		23	0.37	32	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.48	7	0.50	6	0.49
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.27	25	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	57	0.05	62	0.04
Poblocka 1999		57	0.27	71	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	79	0.03	59	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		37	0.34	33	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.35	65	0.04	35	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		41	0.32	40	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.22	41	0.12	21	0.16
Rangell 2001		69	0.26	70	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	49	0.07	58	0.05
Richter 1976		68	0.26	23	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	69	0.03	75	0.03
Rosen 1989		11	0.42	59	0.00	12	0.11	15	0.47	42	0.20	14	0.31
Rosenthal 1930		43	0.32	76	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	36	0.23	31	0.13
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.25	72	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	63	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		42	0.32	26	0.00	51	0.07	48	0.07	28	0.30	27	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		50	0.31	68	0.00	46	0.06	56	0.06	50	0.08	49	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		65	0.26	53	0.00	68	0.03	83	0.03	65	0.04	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		78	0.22	64	0.00	79	0.04	68	0.04	55	0.05	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.25	87	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	58	0.04	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.35	54	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.20	70	0.04	45	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.37	36	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	64	0.05	56	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		52	0.30	77	0.00	58	0.07	47	0.07	86	0.03	57	0.05
Shebanova 2002		5	0.47	10	0.01	5	0.39	5	0.68	12	0.51	5	0.59
Smith 1975		17	0.38	12	0.01	17	0.07	20	0.42	40	0.23	13	0.31
Sokolov 2002		77	0.23	88	0.00	80	0.04	64	0.04	70	0.03	71	0.03
Sztompka 1959		49	0.31	41	0.00	49	0.06	53	0.06	53	0.05	54	0.05
Tomsic 1995		84	0.17	78	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02
Uninsky 1932		86	0.10	90	0.00	86	0.04	67	0.04	88	0.02	81	0.03
Uninsky 1971		70	0.26	55	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	79	0.03	78	0.03
Wasowski 1980		12	0.41	6	0.02	9	0.16	9	0.53	30	0.35	8	0.43
Zak 1937		4	0.50	4	0.03	4	0.32	4	0.71	12	0.59	4	0.65
Zak 1951		3	0.51	3	0.03	3	0.27	3	0.74	10	0.61	3	0.67
Random 1		90	-0.14	45	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	80	0.02	89	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.06	60	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	69	0.03	87	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.07	81	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	65	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).