Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		62	0.42	38	0.00	70	0.06	56	0.06	37	0.17	62	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.59	36	0.00	22	0.10	14	0.54	14	0.56	18	0.55
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.42	76	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.03	84	0.03
Bacha 2000		44	0.49	32	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	1	0.62	45	0.19
Badura 1965		59	0.42	25	0.01	60	0.05	62	0.05	31	0.26	60	0.11
Barbosa 1983		1	0.67	1	0.24	1	0.24	2	0.71	3	0.75	2	0.73
Biret 1990		27	0.55	17	0.01	27	0.08	26	0.35	24	0.42	30	0.38
Blet 2003		60	0.42	83	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	38	0.15	65	0.08
Block 1995		21	0.59	6	0.05	13	0.12	24	0.47	4	0.71	15	0.58
Blumental 1952		14	0.60	4	0.07	10	0.13	17	0.53	10	0.66	13	0.59
Boshniakovich 1969		65	0.41	59	0.00	58	0.06	55	0.06	52	0.06	73	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.52	10	0.02	29	0.07	38	0.18	27	0.42	40	0.27
Bunin 1987		49	0.47	68	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	10	0.48	48	0.17
Bunin 1987b		47	0.47	53	0.00	43	0.08	37	0.21	6	0.57	31	0.35
Chiu 1999		48	0.47	29	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	10	0.45	42	0.23
Cohen 1997		71	0.35	71	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	54	0.04	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		74	0.34	47	0.00	71	0.05	64	0.05	37	0.25	61	0.11
Csalog 1996		39	0.51	62	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.25	13	0.47	32	0.34
Czerny 1949		25	0.56	14	0.01	7	0.13	16	0.53	25	0.59	17	0.56
Czerny 1990		9	0.61	13	0.01	9	0.28	8	0.60	23	0.61	9	0.60
Duchoud 2007		83	0.23	55	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	47	0.07	75	0.05
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		2	0.66	9	0.03	4	0.17	4	0.70	5	0.70	3	0.70
Farrell 1958		40	0.50	20	0.01	28	0.08	29	0.29	17	0.54	28	0.40
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.45	44	0.00	62	0.05	66	0.05	33	0.30	58	0.12
Fliere 1977		13	0.60	31	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.53	14	0.51	21	0.52
Fou 1978		12	0.60	27	0.01	24	0.11	23	0.49	8	0.54	22	0.51
Francois 1956		78	0.29	35	0.00	75	0.02	86	0.02	71	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923		82	0.25	77	0.00	84	0.04	73	0.04	69	0.04	81	0.04
Friedman 1923b		81	0.25	58	0.00	83	0.04	74	0.04	63	0.05	80	0.04
Friedman 1930		80	0.26	84	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03
Garcia 2007		73	0.34	72	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	35	0.25	59	0.11
Garcia 2007b		67	0.39	39	0.00	56	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.06	74	0.06
Gierzod 1998		19	0.59	41	0.00	14	0.11	12	0.56	22	0.45	24	0.50
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.53	85	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.17	20	0.44	41	0.27
Groot 1988		64	0.42	63	0.00	53	0.05	63	0.05	65	0.05	76	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		3	0.64	8	0.03	8	0.18	9	0.60	14	0.61	10	0.60
Hatto 1993		31	0.54	37	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.24	26	0.37	37	0.30
Hatto 1997		28	0.55	86	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.28	27	0.40	33	0.33
Horowitz 1949		84	0.23	64	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	68	0.04	82	0.03
Indjic 1988		32	0.54	65	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.25	29	0.33	38	0.29
Kapell 1951		5	0.62	5	0.07	3	0.19	1	0.72	1	0.75	1	0.73
Kissin 1993		23	0.58	23	0.01	26	0.09	27	0.33	11	0.61	25	0.45
Kushner 1989		24	0.56	43	0.00	25	0.14	22	0.50	30	0.36	26	0.42
Luisada 1991		42	0.50	42	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	26	0.37	52	0.15
Lushtak 2004		34	0.53	57	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.27	28	0.40	34	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		10	0.61	2	0.15	2	0.17	5	0.67	4	0.64	6	0.65
Magaloff 1978		29	0.55	46	0.00	32	0.05	36	0.21	19	0.45	35	0.31
Magin 1975		30	0.55	48	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.30	17	0.53	27	0.40
Michalowski 1933		86	0.21	78	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	37	0.14	72	0.06
Milkina 1970		11	0.61	3	0.09	6	0.21	7	0.61	16	0.55	14	0.58
Mohovich 1999		15	0.60	16	0.01	16	0.14	11	0.58	9	0.62	8	0.60
Moravec 1969		16	0.60	28	0.00	12	0.14	6	0.61	2	0.73	5	0.67
Morozova 2008		54	0.45	49	0.00	50	0.07	45	0.07	22	0.41	47	0.17
Neighaus 1950		85	0.23	79	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		76	0.32	80	0.00	74	0.03	84	0.03	51	0.06	79	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		56	0.45	19	0.01	41	0.06	40	0.17	16	0.46	39	0.28
Osinska 1989		4	0.64	7	0.03	5	0.23	3	0.70	9	0.68	4	0.69
Pachmann 1927		72	0.35	30	0.00	59	0.05	59	0.05	11	0.54	50	0.16
Paderewski 1930		87	0.06	87	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.02	89	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		79	0.29	60	0.00	82	0.04	75	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.30	88	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	51	0.05	78	0.04
Poblocka 1999		7	0.62	18	0.01	11	0.15	19	0.51	13	0.55	20	0.53
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.46	34	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.17	26	0.32	43	0.23
Rachmaninoff 1923		41	0.50	45	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	26	0.39	53	0.14
Rangell 2001		55	0.45	11	0.01	51	0.06	52	0.06	18	0.48	49	0.17
Richter 1976		18	0.59	12	0.01	18	0.09	20	0.51	4	0.69	12	0.59
Rosen 1989		38	0.52	33	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	24	0.35	54	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.37	61	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	40	0.13	68	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		66	0.40	73	0.00	66	0.05	69	0.05	28	0.35	55	0.13
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.33	52	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		61	0.42	69	0.00	65	0.05	70	0.05	37	0.19	63	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.36	74	0.00	69	0.06	57	0.06	34	0.27	56	0.13
Rossi 2007		68	0.37	26	0.01	64	0.05	67	0.05	27	0.29	57	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.48	50	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.11	25	0.39	44	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		22	0.59	56	0.00	21	0.11	13	0.55	14	0.56	19	0.55
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.59	24	0.01	15	0.11	10	0.59	21	0.53	16	0.56
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.52	66	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.17	12	0.54	36	0.30
Shebanova 2002		52	0.46	51	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	42	0.14	66	0.08
Smith 1975		45	0.48	22	0.01	63	0.05	65	0.05	48	0.08	70	0.06
Sokolov 2002		43	0.49	40	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.23	5	0.65	29	0.39
Sztompka 1959		58	0.43	75	0.00	68	0.06	54	0.06	45	0.07	71	0.06
Tomsic 1995		26	0.56	21	0.01	23	0.12	25	0.41	5	0.63	23	0.51
Uninsky 1932		57	0.44	54	0.00	52	0.07	46	0.07	21	0.52	46	0.19
Uninsky 1971		37	0.52	89	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	32	0.35	51	0.16
Wasowski 1980		50	0.47	81	0.00	54	0.05	68	0.05	42	0.16	64	0.09
Zak 1937		8	0.61	70	0.00	20	0.12	21	0.51	5	0.69	11	0.59
Zak 1951		6	0.62	15	0.01	17	0.10	15	0.53	5	0.71	7	0.61
Random 1		89	-0.03	82	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	29	0.22	69	0.07
Random 2		88	0.06	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	15	0.36	67	0.08
Random 3		90	-0.08	67	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	53	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).