Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		59	0.29	68	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	55	0.04	83	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		38	0.33	30	0.00	26	0.05	33	0.15	66	0.05	34	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		67	0.27	63	0.00	70	0.04	57	0.04	57	0.03	85	0.03
Bacha 2000		26	0.35	48	0.00	15	0.07	11	0.35	19	0.39	3	0.37
Badura 1965		84	0.20	64	0.00	77	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02
Barbosa 1983		40	0.33	44	0.00	50	0.04	53	0.04	77	0.03	79	0.03
Biret 1990		18	0.37	38	0.00	13	0.07	16	0.31	80	0.03	31	0.10
Blet 2003		56	0.30	18	0.01	18	0.07	23	0.22	31	0.20	6	0.21
Block 1995		85	0.18	79	0.00	85	0.03	73	0.03	64	0.04	84	0.03
Blumental 1952		25	0.35	84	0.00	30	0.05	24	0.22	51	0.06	23	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		29	0.35	54	0.00	20	0.06	20	0.27	67	0.04	29	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		65	0.27	46	0.00	64	0.05	48	0.05	72	0.04	58	0.04
Bunin 1987		53	0.31	69	0.00	38	0.04	27	0.20	51	0.05	30	0.10
Bunin 1987b		57	0.29	73	0.00	39	0.07	30	0.18	38	0.16	11	0.17
Chiu 1999		48	0.31	14	0.02	35	0.04	35	0.13	46	0.07	26	0.10
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		54	0.30	23	0.01	55	0.05	52	0.05	29	0.33	17	0.13
Csalog 1996		64	0.27	29	0.00	34	0.04	37	0.12	76	0.04	42	0.07
Czerny 1949		47	0.32	34	0.00	62	0.06	46	0.06	78	0.03	66	0.04
Czerny 1990		41	0.33	85	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.03	86	0.03
Duchoud 2007		76	0.24	40	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.06	53	0.05
Ezaki 2006		24	0.35	21	0.01	45	0.04	54	0.04	77	0.03	69	0.03
Falvay 1989		6	0.41	5	0.07	7	0.09	9	0.40	56	0.05	15	0.14
Farrell 1958		43	0.32	55	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	72	0.04	61	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		78	0.23	74	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.03
Fliere 1977		42	0.33	56	0.00	48	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	70	0.03
Fou 1978		33	0.34	58	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05
Francois 1956		35	0.34	45	0.00	36	0.04	32	0.16	47	0.06	33	0.10
Friedman 1923		82	0.21	35	0.00	79	0.04	68	0.04	48	0.06	56	0.05
Friedman 1923b		83	0.20	70	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	59	0.05	67	0.04
Friedman 1930		73	0.25	57	0.00	41	0.04	44	0.08	49	0.07	43	0.07
Garcia 2007		49	0.31	53	0.00	63	0.06	45	0.06	44	0.11	38	0.08
Garcia 2007b		1	0.44	1	0.13	1	0.13	2	0.59	27	0.35	1	0.45
Gierzod 1998		10	0.39	36	0.00	17	0.06	17	0.29	69	0.04	21	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		30	0.34	42	0.00	32	0.05	34	0.15	77	0.03	45	0.07
Groot 1988		11	0.39	2	0.13	3	0.23	3	0.57	29	0.22	4	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.37	26	0.00	29	0.05	26	0.20	72	0.04	35	0.09
Hatto 1993		22	0.36	4	0.07	5	0.23	4	0.54	60	0.04	14	0.15
Hatto 1997		17	0.37	9	0.03	4	0.13	5	0.54	53	0.05	13	0.16
Horowitz 1949		74	0.25	49	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	43	0.11	41	0.07
Indjic 1988		21	0.36	13	0.02	6	0.23	6	0.53	55	0.05	12	0.16
Kapell 1951		37	0.33	6	0.06	25	0.06	39	0.10	67	0.04	46	0.06
Kissin 1993		71	0.26	61	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03
Kushner 1989		9	0.40	7	0.04	11	0.08	12	0.33	73	0.04	20	0.11
Luisada 1991		20	0.36	11	0.03	21	0.06	22	0.23	58	0.04	25	0.10
Lushtak 2004		28	0.35	86	0.00	27	0.06	15	0.31	67	0.04	22	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		60	0.29	71	0.00	57	0.04	64	0.04	79	0.02	74	0.03
Magaloff 1978		52	0.31	72	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	73	0.03	73	0.03
Magin 1975		14	0.37	50	0.00	43	0.04	40	0.09	54	0.05	40	0.07
Michalowski 1933		87	0.13	80	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		2	0.43	3	0.12	2	0.16	1	0.61	51	0.06	7	0.19
Mohovich 1999		23	0.36	37	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.08	85	0.03	55	0.05
Moravec 1969		19	0.36	24	0.01	49	0.04	62	0.04	65	0.05	57	0.04
Morozova 2008		69	0.26	75	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03
Neighaus 1950		70	0.26	47	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	57	0.05	68	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.28	8	0.04	19	0.07	28	0.18	33	0.19	9	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.33	15	0.02	12	0.07	18	0.27	66	0.04	28	0.10
Osinska 1989		15	0.37	76	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.18	76	0.03	39	0.07
Pachmann 1927		86	0.17	81	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.03
Paderewski 1930		80	0.21	82	0.00	65	0.03	72	0.03	43	0.12	47	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.31	87	0.00	40	0.04	42	0.08	41	0.14	19	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		7	0.40	16	0.01	14	0.07	14	0.32	21	0.48	2	0.39
Poblocka 1999		75	0.25	67	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		31	0.34	28	0.00	24	0.06	25	0.21	75	0.03	36	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		61	0.28	77	0.00	42	0.04	41	0.09	77	0.03	51	0.05
Rangell 2001		8	0.40	27	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.32	61	0.06	16	0.14
Richter 1976		66	0.27	88	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03
Rosen 1989		34	0.34	12	0.03	37	0.05	38	0.11	61	0.04	44	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.26	89	0.00	76	0.03	71	0.03	43	0.10	54	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		68	0.27	43	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	43	0.11	48	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		55	0.30	20	0.01	47	0.04	61	0.04	32	0.23	32	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.23	51	0.00	82	0.03	70	0.03	76	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.24	31	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	52	0.06	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		13	0.37	41	0.00	22	0.06	21	0.27	32	0.23	5	0.25
Rubinstein 1939		44	0.32	83	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	79	0.03	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.42	10	0.03	10	0.08	10	0.39	78	0.03	24	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.42	25	0.01	9	0.09	7	0.49	47	0.07	8	0.19
Schilhawsky 1960		63	0.28	65	0.00	73	0.04	69	0.04	87	0.02	80	0.03
Shebanova 2002		32	0.34	62	0.00	59	0.05	50	0.05	75	0.04	65	0.04
Smith 1975		46	0.32	33	0.00	61	0.06	47	0.06	79	0.03	59	0.04
Sokolov 2002		81	0.21	52	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	65	0.03	72	0.03
Sztompka 1959		58	0.29	59	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.04
Tomsic 1995		27	0.35	22	0.01	33	0.05	36	0.13	47	0.08	27	0.10
Uninsky 1932		45	0.32	19	0.01	51	0.04	67	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04
Uninsky 1971		5	0.41	17	0.01	8	0.09	8	0.46	46	0.07	10	0.18
Wasowski 1980		12	0.38	32	0.00	23	0.06	19	0.27	75	0.05	18	0.12
Zak 1937		50	0.31	60	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	70	0.04	62	0.04
Zak 1951		39	0.33	90	0.00	28	0.05	31	0.17	66	0.04	37	0.08
Random 1		89	-0.02	78	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	38	0.17	50	0.06
Random 2		88	0.04	39	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	36	0.16	49	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.09	66	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	57	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).