Bunin 1987b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		82	0.22	42	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		5	0.49	43	0.00	3	0.13	5	0.60	39	0.23	7	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		57	0.34	44	0.00	66	0.04	71	0.04	45	0.07	60	0.05
Bacha 2000		50	0.36	4	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.17	23	0.33	16	0.24
Badura 1965		44	0.37	12	0.00	13	0.13	17	0.40	21	0.37	5	0.38
Barbosa 1983		7	0.48	45	0.00	6	0.13	7	0.57	47	0.08	19	0.21
Biret 1990		45	0.37	23	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	73	0.03	75	0.04
Blet 2003		46	0.37	24	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.23	20	0.26	17	0.24
Block 1995		71	0.28	15	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	81	0.03	83	0.03
Blumental 1952		35	0.38	46	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	70	0.05	59	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.45	16	0.00	12	0.13	11	0.50	56	0.06	24	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.29	47	0.00	75	0.05	62	0.05	74	0.04	62	0.04
Bunin 1987		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Bunin 1987b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Chiu 1999		59	0.33	13	0.00	45	0.06	51	0.06	41	0.13	44	0.09
Cohen 1997		65	0.29	14	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.16	30	0.18	25	0.17
Cortot 1951		84	0.17	48	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.02	90	0.02
Csalog 1996		33	0.39	49	0.00	37	0.07	28	0.28	55	0.05	34	0.12
Czerny 1949		10	0.45	25	0.00	27	0.05	24	0.32	52	0.07	27	0.15
Czerny 1990		36	0.38	50	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	69	0.04	61	0.05
Duchoud 2007		79	0.24	51	0.00	21	0.06	40	0.13	27	0.44	18	0.24
Ezaki 2006		9	0.47	10	0.00	8	0.12	6	0.57	37	0.21	8	0.35
Falvay 1989		13	0.44	26	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.56	43	0.16	11	0.30
Farrell 1958		60	0.33	52	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	60	0.05	67	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		55	0.35	17	0.00	61	0.04	74	0.04	61	0.05	72	0.04
Fliere 1977		15	0.44	27	0.00	11	0.12	15	0.43	45	0.07	23	0.17
Fou 1978		78	0.25	53	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03	79	0.03
Francois 1956		74	0.26	28	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.05	77	0.04
Friedman 1923		86	0.14	54	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.16	55	0.00	78	0.03	87	0.03	61	0.05	74	0.04
Friedman 1930		76	0.25	56	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.14	46	0.08
Garcia 2007		53	0.36	57	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	34	0.27	36	0.12
Garcia 2007b		42	0.37	6	0.00	26	0.05	35	0.19	52	0.06	39	0.11
Gierzod 1998		14	0.44	58	0.00	28	0.06	31	0.24	68	0.04	43	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.48	59	0.00	9	0.14	9	0.56	27	0.37	3	0.46
Groot 1988		20	0.42	18	0.00	16	0.09	19	0.40	40	0.11	20	0.21
Harasiewicz 1955		54	0.35	19	0.00	67	0.05	54	0.05	79	0.03	76	0.04
Hatto 1993		16	0.43	60	0.00	20	0.07	20	0.39	64	0.04	37	0.12
Hatto 1997		25	0.41	61	0.00	25	0.05	23	0.35	63	0.04	35	0.12
Horowitz 1949		37	0.38	62	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	31	0.25	41	0.10
Indjic 1988		22	0.42	63	0.00	24	0.05	22	0.37	65	0.04	33	0.12
Kapell 1951		8	0.47	29	0.00	14	0.09	16	0.42	46	0.08	22	0.18
Kissin 1993		69	0.28	64	0.00	81	0.04	75	0.04	78	0.04	71	0.04
Kushner 1989		12	0.45	65	0.00	18	0.12	12	0.45	53	0.06	26	0.16
Luisada 1991		32	0.39	66	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	44	0.14	40	0.10
Lushtak 2004		24	0.41	2	0.00	10	0.12	10	0.52	40	0.21	9	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.50	30	0.00	2	0.26	2	0.71	27	0.41	2	0.54
Magaloff 1978		52	0.36	67	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	66	0.04	65	0.04
Magin 1975		26	0.41	8	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	69	0.04	57	0.05
Michalowski 1933		87	0.13	68	0.00	87	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Milkina 1970		2	0.51	69	0.00	5	0.17	4	0.62	43	0.11	14	0.26
Mohovich 1999		18	0.42	9	0.00	17	0.11	21	0.38	45	0.06	28	0.15
Moravec 1969		21	0.42	70	0.00	34	0.06	26	0.29	52	0.07	29	0.14
Morozova 2008		17	0.43	71	0.00	19	0.10	13	0.45	34	0.22	10	0.31
Neighaus 1950		66	0.29	72	0.00	38	0.05	44	0.10	63	0.04	51	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.25	73	0.00	72	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.05	56	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.37	74	0.00	15	0.09	14	0.44	33	0.31	6	0.37
Osinska 1989		4	0.49	3	0.00	4	0.15	3	0.62	39	0.23	4	0.38
Pachmann 1927		75	0.26	31	0.00	62	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.05	70	0.04
Paderewski 1930		81	0.22	5	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	50	0.05	69	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		39	0.38	32	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.23	27	0.32	13	0.27
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.23	75	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		47	0.37	76	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.06	54	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		19	0.42	33	0.00	23	0.05	27	0.28	55	0.05	32	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		73	0.27	77	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	55	0.05	66	0.04
Rangell 2001		48	0.37	34	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.18	42	0.10	31	0.13
Richter 1976		63	0.32	35	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	62	0.04	68	0.04
Rosen 1989		51	0.36	78	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.13	54	0.05	47	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.28	79	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		62	0.32	36	0.00	71	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.05	58	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.34	20	0.00	63	0.03	76	0.03	31	0.24	48	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		34	0.38	37	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	38	0.18	30	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		61	0.33	7	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	36	0.21	45	0.09
Rossi 2007		56	0.34	38	0.00	68	0.04	64	0.04	52	0.05	64	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		31	0.39	21	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.37	80	0.00	30	0.06	42	0.11	72	0.03	52	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.40	81	0.00	29	0.05	34	0.19	66	0.05	42	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.40	82	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.26	37	0.25	15	0.25
Shebanova 2002		30	0.40	22	0.00	22	0.06	18	0.40	35	0.21	12	0.29
Smith 1975		83	0.20	39	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Sokolov 2002		64	0.30	83	0.00	73	0.06	49	0.06	77	0.03	63	0.04
Sztompka 1959		72	0.27	84	0.00	83	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.03	80	0.03
Tomsic 1995		29	0.40	11	0.00	40	0.07	30	0.24	41	0.15	21	0.19
Uninsky 1932		68	0.28	85	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	53	0.05	73	0.04
Uninsky 1971		43	0.37	86	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	51	0.06	50	0.06
Wasowski 1980		40	0.38	87	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	79	0.04	53	0.05
Zak 1937		38	0.38	88	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.13	74	0.04	49	0.07
Zak 1951		23	0.41	40	0.00	32	0.06	25	0.31	63	0.04	38	0.11
Random 1		89	-0.04	89	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	46	0.06	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	41	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.04	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	49	0.05	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).