Bunin 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		83	0.22	48	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		5	0.50	13	0.00	3	0.15	3	0.62	33	0.33	4	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.37	49	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	24	0.29	37	0.11
Bacha 2000		52	0.36	15	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	31	0.28	33	0.12
Badura 1965		55	0.35	10	0.00	10	0.12	23	0.31	24	0.35	7	0.33
Barbosa 1983		6	0.50	16	0.00	5	0.17	5	0.58	63	0.06	18	0.19
Biret 1990		43	0.38	50	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	67	0.04	65	0.05
Blet 2003		50	0.36	11	0.00	33	0.06	35	0.16	24	0.25	15	0.20
Block 1995		71	0.30	12	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04	74	0.04
Blumental 1952		35	0.40	25	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	54	0.06	64	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		13	0.46	17	0.00	9	0.12	9	0.52	43	0.11	14	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.32	51	0.00	77	0.06	47	0.06	73	0.04	56	0.05
Bunin 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987b		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Chiu 1999		68	0.31	52	0.00	62	0.03	77	0.03	60	0.05	68	0.04
Cohen 1997		69	0.31	6	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	27	0.20	42	0.10
Cortot 1951		85	0.21	53	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		36	0.40	54	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.14	67	0.04	49	0.07
Czerny 1949		10	0.47	35	0.00	21	0.06	16	0.36	56	0.07	25	0.16
Czerny 1990		41	0.39	55	0.00	40	0.04	39	0.11	63	0.05	50	0.07
Duchoud 2007		80	0.24	26	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	34	0.37	28	0.14
Ezaki 2006		11	0.47	27	0.00	13	0.13	10	0.48	50	0.06	22	0.17
Falvay 1989		9	0.47	36	0.00	8	0.15	8	0.57	40	0.21	6	0.35
Farrell 1958		65	0.32	56	0.00	67	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04	70	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.37	18	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.06	63	0.05
Fliere 1977		15	0.45	57	0.00	14	0.15	14	0.41	52	0.05	27	0.14
Fou 1978		78	0.24	37	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02
Francois 1956		72	0.29	58	0.00	61	0.04	71	0.04	45	0.07	66	0.05
Friedman 1923		84	0.21	59	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.05	77	0.04
Friedman 1923b		86	0.20	60	0.00	71	0.03	85	0.03	60	0.05	75	0.04
Friedman 1930		75	0.29	3	0.00	54	0.07	45	0.07	35	0.23	31	0.13
Garcia 2007		56	0.35	28	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	37	0.24	41	0.10
Garcia 2007b		48	0.37	61	0.00	37	0.05	36	0.14	48	0.06	45	0.09
Gierzod 1998		12	0.46	62	0.00	35	0.07	30	0.21	67	0.04	43	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.51	38	0.00	4	0.17	4	0.61	15	0.49	2	0.55
Groot 1988		30	0.42	7	0.00	17	0.07	19	0.33	59	0.05	32	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		53	0.36	63	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.05	76	0.04
Hatto 1993		17	0.44	64	0.00	27	0.07	17	0.36	77	0.04	35	0.12
Hatto 1997		31	0.42	65	0.00	31	0.08	26	0.26	69	0.04	40	0.10
Horowitz 1949		21	0.43	4	0.00	20	0.06	34	0.16	11	0.49	11	0.28
Indjic 1988		22	0.43	66	0.00	28	0.09	18	0.35	61	0.04	34	0.12
Kapell 1951		14	0.45	5	0.00	23	0.06	27	0.26	45	0.10	24	0.16
Kissin 1993		73	0.29	39	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03
Kushner 1989		8	0.48	67	0.00	12	0.10	12	0.45	52	0.06	23	0.16
Luisada 1991		24	0.43	68	0.00	41	0.04	38	0.13	30	0.28	17	0.19
Lushtak 2004		28	0.42	69	0.00	11	0.11	11	0.47	41	0.19	10	0.30
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.51	40	0.00	2	0.24	2	0.70	25	0.42	3	0.54
Magaloff 1978		49	0.37	70	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	55	0.06	58	0.05
Magin 1975		25	0.43	71	0.00	42	0.04	40	0.11	64	0.04	48	0.07
Michalowski 1933		87	0.13	72	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.02	87	0.02
Milkina 1970		4	0.51	8	0.00	6	0.13	7	0.57	49	0.06	21	0.18
Mohovich 1999		16	0.44	41	0.00	15	0.13	15	0.38	42	0.11	16	0.20
Moravec 1969		23	0.43	29	0.00	34	0.08	29	0.21	56	0.06	36	0.11
Morozova 2008		29	0.42	14	0.00	29	0.06	21	0.32	41	0.11	19	0.19
Neighaus 1950		63	0.32	30	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.11	42	0.11	38	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		81	0.24	73	0.00	75	0.05	53	0.05	45	0.09	47	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.36	19	0.00	26	0.06	25	0.28	37	0.23	13	0.25
Osinska 1989		7	0.48	31	0.00	7	0.14	6	0.58	42	0.16	9	0.30
Pachmann 1927		76	0.27	20	0.00	60	0.04	72	0.04	49	0.06	61	0.05
Paderewski 1930		79	0.24	21	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.04	80	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		39	0.39	22	0.00	24	0.05	31	0.19	25	0.35	12	0.26
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.25	42	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	49	0.05	69	0.04
Poblocka 1999		44	0.38	74	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	77	0.04	67	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		18	0.44	75	0.00	22	0.06	20	0.32	59	0.05	29	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923		66	0.31	32	0.00	39	0.04	42	0.11	61	0.05	46	0.07
Rangell 2001		33	0.40	43	0.00	30	0.06	32	0.18	38	0.20	20	0.19
Richter 1976		59	0.33	44	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04
Rosen 1989		54	0.35	76	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	47	0.06	54	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		74	0.29	77	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	70	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		62	0.33	9	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		57	0.35	78	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	29	0.26	44	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		37	0.40	45	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	31	0.24	26	0.15
Rosenthal 1931d		58	0.34	79	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	40	0.14	51	0.07
Rossi 2007		61	0.33	80	0.00	74	0.05	56	0.05	47	0.06	57	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.42	33	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	65	0.04	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.40	81	0.00	19	0.08	33	0.17	73	0.03	52	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		20	0.43	82	0.00	18	0.06	22	0.32	67	0.05	30	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		26	0.43	46	0.00	25	0.05	24	0.30	31	0.34	8	0.32
Shebanova 2002		19	0.43	2	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.41	26	0.32	5	0.36
Smith 1975		82	0.23	83	0.00	84	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03
Sokolov 2002		60	0.33	84	0.00	64	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.03	78	0.03
Sztompka 1959		70	0.30	34	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.03
Tomsic 1995		40	0.39	85	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.05	60	0.05
Uninsky 1932		67	0.31	23	0.00	76	0.04	67	0.04	52	0.05	73	0.04
Uninsky 1971		45	0.37	86	0.00	45	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.06	62	0.05
Wasowski 1980		42	0.38	87	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	70	0.05	55	0.05
Zak 1937		38	0.39	47	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.05	59	0.05
Zak 1951		27	0.42	24	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.25	68	0.04	39	0.10
Random 1		89	-0.05	88	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	56	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.04	88	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	64	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).