Biret 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.50	66	0.00	36	0.09	37	0.22	2	0.66	34	0.38
Anderszewski 2003		31	0.50	69	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.13	45	0.09	65	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.45	54	0.00	54	0.05	62	0.05	8	0.47	51	0.15
Bacha 2000		67	0.39	70	0.00	74	0.02	87	0.02	46	0.05	88	0.03
Badura 1965		57	0.42	15	0.01	62	0.06	49	0.06	32	0.25	59	0.12
Barbosa 1983		12	0.55	10	0.02	12	0.12	10	0.56	16	0.55	11	0.55
Biret 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blet 2003		56	0.43	86	0.00	59	0.06	50	0.06	9	0.45	49	0.16
Block 1995		42	0.47	52	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	21	0.44	50	0.16
Blumental 1952		5	0.58	60	0.00	9	0.10	5	0.58	4	0.72	3	0.65
Boshniakovich 1969		28	0.50	58	0.00	19	0.07	22	0.43	16	0.42	28	0.42
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.52	46	0.00	32	0.10	33	0.34	13	0.57	25	0.44
Bunin 1987		70	0.38	81	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	46	0.06	81	0.05
Bunin 1987b		73	0.37	83	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	48	0.06	82	0.04
Chiu 1999		46	0.45	18	0.01	52	0.07	45	0.07	16	0.40	46	0.17
Cohen 1997		74	0.37	82	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	16	0.31	70	0.10
Cortot 1951		76	0.35	63	0.00	82	0.03	74	0.03	28	0.34	71	0.10
Csalog 1996		39	0.48	24	0.00	25	0.09	36	0.23	19	0.35	37	0.28
Czerny 1949		49	0.44	84	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	47	0.08	78	0.06
Czerny 1990		18	0.54	77	0.00	15	0.11	21	0.44	32	0.47	23	0.45
Duchoud 2007		86	0.25	88	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	59	0.05	85	0.04
Ezaki 2006		14	0.55	37	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.42	26	0.35	31	0.38
Falvay 1989		8	0.56	11	0.01	23	0.09	17	0.47	31	0.45	22	0.46
Farrell 1958		55	0.43	31	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	41	0.20	67	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		63	0.40	79	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	36	0.24	69	0.10
Fliere 1977		2	0.63	2	0.25	2	0.26	4	0.63	6	0.59	6	0.61
Fou 1978		24	0.53	23	0.00	31	0.08	28	0.36	19	0.41	32	0.38
Francois 1956		65	0.39	29	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	4	0.56	45	0.18
Friedman 1923		78	0.34	59	0.00	75	0.02	86	0.02	25	0.36	76	0.08
Friedman 1923b		82	0.31	48	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	34	0.26	72	0.09
Friedman 1930		52	0.43	56	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	7	0.58	47	0.17
Garcia 2007		80	0.33	42	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	39	0.20	75	0.08
Garcia 2007b		66	0.39	87	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	31	0.31	62	0.12
Gierzod 1998		11	0.55	8	0.02	10	0.11	9	0.56	20	0.47	18	0.51
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.43	89	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.13	31	0.33	40	0.21
Groot 1988		17	0.54	39	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.48	2	0.57	16	0.52
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.53	26	0.00	29	0.08	25	0.42	31	0.42	29	0.42
Hatto 1993		15	0.55	40	0.00	17	0.11	14	0.51	12	0.54	17	0.52
Hatto 1997		19	0.54	80	0.00	22	0.09	18	0.47	15	0.52	19	0.49
Horowitz 1949		77	0.35	71	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	12	0.48	57	0.12
Indjic 1988		13	0.55	67	0.00	16	0.11	13	0.53	10	0.57	10	0.55
Kapell 1951		50	0.44	49	0.00	61	0.05	52	0.05	51	0.06	79	0.05
Kissin 1993		62	0.40	85	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	59	0.05	84	0.04
Kushner 1989		6	0.57	30	0.00	7	0.12	2	0.66	17	0.50	8	0.57
Luisada 1991		48	0.44	19	0.01	41	0.05	42	0.11	18	0.49	38	0.23
Lushtak 2004		33	0.49	12	0.01	20	0.08	23	0.43	18	0.51	21	0.47
Malcuzynski 1961		36	0.49	73	0.00	37	0.11	35	0.28	34	0.30	36	0.29
Magaloff 1978		21	0.53	25	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.36	12	0.51	27	0.43
Magin 1975		37	0.48	14	0.01	33	0.08	31	0.35	21	0.47	30	0.41
Michalowski 1933		84	0.27	43	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	5	0.57	54	0.13
Milkina 1970		7	0.57	3	0.13	4	0.24	1	0.69	11	0.59	4	0.64
Mohovich 1999		4	0.58	6	0.03	11	0.12	8	0.56	8	0.62	7	0.59
Moravec 1969		41	0.47	68	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	36	0.19	56	0.12
Morozova 2008		59	0.41	50	0.00	45	0.05	64	0.05	27	0.34	55	0.13
Neighaus 1950		81	0.32	47	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	56	0.05	87	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.36	44	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	21	0.35	66	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.50	7	0.02	24	0.09	26	0.38	7	0.58	20	0.47
Osinska 1989		10	0.55	13	0.01	8	0.11	11	0.55	24	0.52	13	0.53
Pachmann 1927		85	0.25	74	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	54	0.05	83	0.04
Paderewski 1930		87	0.23	51	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	29	0.21	74	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		64	0.40	75	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	6	0.50	48	0.16
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.33	72	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	25	0.37	63	0.11
Poblocka 1999		43	0.46	27	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.13	39	0.24	42	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		27	0.51	4	0.04	5	0.17	15	0.50	5	0.54	14	0.52
Rachmaninoff 1923		9	0.56	5	0.04	6	0.25	7	0.58	2	0.73	2	0.65
Rangell 2001		69	0.39	45	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.06	86	0.04
Richter 1976		44	0.46	41	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.25	64	0.11
Rosen 1989		51	0.43	53	0.00	48	0.05	61	0.05	30	0.31	60	0.12
Rosenthal 1930		47	0.45	34	0.00	58	0.06	48	0.06	11	0.57	44	0.18
Rosenthal 1931		72	0.37	55	0.00	67	0.04	65	0.04	32	0.25	68	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		53	0.43	22	0.01	63	0.04	66	0.04	16	0.47	53	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		61	0.40	33	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	29	0.27	61	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.41	76	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	17	0.47	52	0.14
Rossi 2007		83	0.31	16	0.01	83	0.04	68	0.04	37	0.15	73	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		35	0.49	57	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.12	23	0.42	39	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		26	0.52	78	0.00	26	0.11	27	0.37	28	0.37	35	0.37
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.54	17	0.01	13	0.11	12	0.54	23	0.50	15	0.52
Schilhawsky 1960		22	0.53	9	0.02	14	0.10	20	0.45	4	0.68	12	0.55
Shebanova 2002		29	0.50	35	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.34	10	0.56	26	0.44
Smith 1975		23	0.53	20	0.01	21	0.07	19	0.47	5	0.65	9	0.55
Sokolov 2002		38	0.48	61	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	11	0.52	43	0.18
Sztompka 1959		71	0.37	28	0.00	55	0.05	60	0.05	36	0.28	58	0.12
Tomsic 1995		58	0.41	62	0.00	68	0.05	63	0.05	65	0.05	80	0.05
Uninsky 1932		68	0.39	38	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.08	23	0.50	41	0.20
Uninsky 1971		34	0.49	36	0.00	35	0.09	34	0.29	20	0.50	33	0.38
Wasowski 1980		40	0.47	32	0.00	34	0.11	30	0.36	12	0.53	24	0.44
Zak 1937		3	0.61	21	0.01	3	0.23	6	0.58	4	0.69	5	0.63
Zak 1951		1	0.63	1	0.28	1	0.28	3	0.63	4	0.74	1	0.68
Random 1		90	-0.09	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.06	65	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	26	0.26	77	0.07
Random 3		89	-0.04	64	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	45	0.08	89	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).