Anderszewski 2003

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		79	0.28	87	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	74	0.03	90	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ashkenazy 1981		66	0.36	71	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	40	0.13	67	0.07
Bacha 2000		53	0.43	19	0.01	43	0.08	42	0.15	5	0.56	41	0.29
Badura 1965		38	0.48	38	0.00	41	0.09	37	0.27	5	0.55	34	0.39
Barbosa 1983		5	0.62	4	0.09	6	0.18	2	0.72	4	0.71	2	0.71
Biret 1990		33	0.50	64	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	39	0.13	56	0.11
Blet 2003		62	0.39	72	0.00	67	0.05	64	0.05	45	0.07	71	0.06
Block 1995		16	0.56	17	0.01	28	0.12	26	0.45	5	0.68	19	0.55
Blumental 1952		45	0.45	57	0.00	54	0.06	58	0.06	56	0.06	74	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		30	0.51	13	0.02	12	0.14	12	0.57	8	0.56	16	0.56
Brailowsky 1960		18	0.55	12	0.02	29	0.11	32	0.34	14	0.56	28	0.44
Bunin 1987		31	0.50	65	0.00	36	0.10	33	0.33	3	0.62	27	0.45
Bunin 1987b		36	0.49	50	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.23	5	0.60	38	0.37
Chiu 1999		65	0.37	46	0.00	66	0.05	65	0.05	42	0.13	64	0.08
Cohen 1997		71	0.33	45	0.00	68	0.05	66	0.05	33	0.15	63	0.09
Cortot 1951		69	0.34	27	0.00	59	0.06	60	0.06	22	0.44	48	0.16
Csalog 1996		49	0.44	47	0.00	55	0.06	56	0.06	45	0.07	70	0.06
Czerny 1949		23	0.54	22	0.00	11	0.14	13	0.57	14	0.67	10	0.62
Czerny 1990		4	0.62	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.74	7	0.76	1	0.75
Duchoud 2007		81	0.25	29	0.00	70	0.04	72	0.04	29	0.43	52	0.13
Ezaki 2006		9	0.59	11	0.03	19	0.10	14	0.56	14	0.54	17	0.55
Falvay 1989		1	0.63	5	0.06	9	0.18	3	0.68	8	0.66	4	0.67
Farrell 1958		47	0.45	75	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.26	19	0.49	40	0.36
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.41	58	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	29	0.39	54	0.12
Fliere 1977		11	0.58	14	0.01	15	0.11	16	0.52	17	0.50	23	0.51
Fou 1978		24	0.53	48	0.00	31	0.14	27	0.44	17	0.44	29	0.44
Francois 1956		84	0.24	76	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1923		72	0.33	52	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	40	0.13	75	0.06
Friedman 1923b		74	0.33	53	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	45	0.07	77	0.05
Friedman 1930		76	0.31	77	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	50	0.06	82	0.04
Garcia 2007		68	0.34	73	0.00	65	0.06	53	0.06	31	0.33	51	0.14
Garcia 2007b		63	0.39	30	0.00	33	0.06	43	0.13	26	0.38	44	0.22
Gierzod 1998		20	0.54	37	0.00	21	0.12	17	0.52	27	0.35	31	0.43
Gornostaeva 1994		19	0.54	36	0.00	16	0.09	19	0.50	7	0.60	20	0.55
Groot 1988		56	0.42	31	0.00	49	0.08	46	0.08	31	0.20	53	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.61	9	0.04	10	0.19	10	0.61	15	0.60	12	0.60
Hatto 1993		22	0.54	21	0.00	18	0.12	23	0.48	15	0.50	24	0.49
Hatto 1997		29	0.52	39	0.00	27	0.14	28	0.43	18	0.45	30	0.44
Horowitz 1949		77	0.31	78	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	49	0.06	81	0.04
Indjic 1988		28	0.53	79	0.00	26	0.13	25	0.45	20	0.49	26	0.47
Kapell 1951		3	0.63	3	0.12	5	0.25	6	0.66	6	0.71	3	0.68
Kissin 1993		21	0.54	80	0.00	24	0.12	24	0.47	9	0.67	15	0.56
Kushner 1989		2	0.63	8	0.05	3	0.15	5	0.66	7	0.65	6	0.65
Luisada 1991		51	0.43	59	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	37	0.20	57	0.10
Lushtak 2004		15	0.56	20	0.00	20	0.11	18	0.51	8	0.59	18	0.55
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.57	2	0.15	2	0.18	9	0.63	5	0.64	7	0.63
Magaloff 1978		26	0.53	49	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.29	18	0.47	37	0.37
Magin 1975		44	0.46	25	0.00	48	0.05	63	0.05	35	0.20	58	0.10
Michalowski 1933		87	0.14	88	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	54	0.04	87	0.03
Milkina 1970		10	0.59	6	0.05	4	0.21	8	0.63	9	0.61	8	0.62
Mohovich 1999		25	0.53	60	0.00	30	0.11	30	0.36	25	0.42	35	0.39
Moravec 1969		17	0.56	44	0.00	23	0.10	21	0.49	5	0.65	14	0.56
Morozova 2008		41	0.47	51	0.00	25	0.10	29	0.42	14	0.54	25	0.48
Neighaus 1950		73	0.33	81	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	34	0.19	65	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.29	61	0.00	80	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.05	80	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.42	66	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.17	27	0.38	42	0.25
Osinska 1989		12	0.58	7	0.05	7	0.17	4	0.68	15	0.62	5	0.65
Pachmann 1927		83	0.24	82	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	41	0.13	69	0.06
Paderewski 1930		86	0.16	69	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	58	0.04	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		82	0.25	70	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	68	0.04	85	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		85	0.23	89	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	45	0.06	79	0.04
Poblocka 1999		8	0.60	28	0.00	13	0.18	11	0.60	8	0.63	11	0.61
Rabcewiczowa 1932		64	0.38	41	0.00	51	0.08	48	0.08	54	0.05	68	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.46	67	0.00	46	0.06	57	0.06	27	0.36	49	0.15
Rangell 2001		50	0.43	62	0.00	47	0.06	59	0.06	19	0.46	46	0.17
Richter 1976		27	0.53	42	0.00	22	0.10	20	0.50	9	0.67	13	0.58
Rosen 1989		54	0.42	55	0.00	53	0.05	62	0.05	39	0.23	55	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.34	74	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	41	0.13	73	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		60	0.39	43	0.00	64	0.06	55	0.06	16	0.45	47	0.16
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.35	83	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	30	0.25	61	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		59	0.40	32	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	28	0.27	62	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.32	84	0.00	77	0.02	86	0.02	51	0.06	88	0.03
Rossi 2007		80	0.28	63	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.05	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		34	0.49	34	0.00	37	0.08	35	0.31	19	0.46	36	0.38
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.56	18	0.01	17	0.10	15	0.56	18	0.53	22	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.61	10	0.03	8	0.25	7	0.66	20	0.58	9	0.62
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.39	15	0.01	60	0.08	47	0.08	44	0.13	59	0.10
Shebanova 2002		57	0.42	54	0.00	56	0.06	52	0.06	45	0.07	72	0.06
Smith 1975		40	0.47	40	0.00	52	0.07	50	0.07	32	0.29	50	0.14
Sokolov 2002		52	0.43	56	0.00	50	0.07	51	0.07	15	0.50	45	0.19
Sztompka 1959		39	0.48	26	0.00	14	0.13	22	0.49	15	0.59	21	0.54
Tomsic 1995		37	0.48	23	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	19	0.45	43	0.23
Uninsky 1932		48	0.44	33	0.00	38	0.07	40	0.22	11	0.63	39	0.37
Uninsky 1971		35	0.49	85	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.32	21	0.50	33	0.40
Wasowski 1980		32	0.50	24	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.36	19	0.48	32	0.42
Zak 1937		42	0.46	16	0.01	57	0.08	49	0.08	45	0.07	66	0.07
Zak 1951		46	0.45	68	0.00	58	0.06	54	0.06	64	0.04	76	0.05
Random 1		88	0.02	35	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	2	0.54	60	0.10
Random 2		89	-0.01	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	66	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.08	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	40	0.13	83	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).