Rossi 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		35	0.54	35	0.00	60	0.07	47	0.07	84	0.02	61	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		9	0.67	62	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.28	66	0.04	29	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.49	59	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	82	0.03	81	0.03
Bacha 2000		1	0.72	10	0.02	10	0.10	10	0.50	22	0.23	9	0.34
Badura 1965		62	0.44	75	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Barbosa 1983		47	0.50	66	0.00	25	0.07	32	0.19	69	0.04	35	0.09
Biret 1990		7	0.70	27	0.01	7	0.11	8	0.52	55	0.05	21	0.16
Blet 2003		50	0.49	40	0.00	46	0.05	64	0.05	73	0.03	58	0.04
Block 1995		54	0.47	39	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.15	76	0.03	44	0.07
Blumental 1952		6	0.71	2	0.14	2	0.15	1	0.61	15	0.24	6	0.38
Boshniakovich 1969		67	0.41	43	0.00	74	0.05	59	0.05	82	0.03	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.66	73	0.00	28	0.06	19	0.35	53	0.04	26	0.12
Bunin 1987		86	0.05	70	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	90	0.01	90	0.01
Bunin 1987b		87	0.03	71	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	90	0.01	87	0.01
Chiu 1999		12	0.65	52	0.00	40	0.05	33	0.17	71	0.03	40	0.07
Cohen 1997		29	0.57	36	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	24	0.29	19	0.17
Cortot 1951		46	0.51	55	0.00	32	0.05	43	0.11	40	0.11	31	0.11
Csalog 1996		73	0.38	24	0.01	24	0.07	27	0.25	36	0.16	15	0.20
Czerny 1949		58	0.44	21	0.01	72	0.04	73	0.04	85	0.02	78	0.03
Czerny 1990		8	0.69	31	0.00	11	0.10	7	0.53	81	0.03	24	0.13
Duchoud 2007		82	0.29	48	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Ezaki 2006		3	0.72	18	0.01	12	0.14	6	0.55	51	0.04	22	0.15
Falvay 1989		11	0.66	11	0.02	9	0.14	11	0.46	9	0.53	3	0.49
Farrell 1958		5	0.71	6	0.05	3	0.14	4	0.56	16	0.44	2	0.50
Ferenczy 1958		37	0.54	56	0.00	50	0.07	48	0.07	68	0.04	49	0.05
Fliere 1977		53	0.48	44	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	66	0.03
Fou 1978		14	0.63	34	0.00	31	0.06	25	0.29	84	0.03	34	0.09
Francois 1956		26	0.58	37	0.00	23	0.10	20	0.34	50	0.05	25	0.13
Friedman 1923		30	0.56	57	0.00	59	0.06	56	0.06	58	0.05	51	0.05
Friedman 1923b		32	0.56	63	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.05	50	0.05
Friedman 1930		31	0.56	33	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	66	0.04	59	0.04
Garcia 2007		28	0.57	19	0.01	42	0.05	39	0.14	76	0.03	47	0.06
Garcia 2007b		43	0.51	29	0.01	43	0.07	40	0.14	72	0.04	46	0.07
Gierzod 1998		52	0.48	41	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	77	0.03	62	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.54	20	0.01	20	0.07	28	0.24	53	0.05	30	0.11
Groot 1988		41	0.52	87	0.00	33	0.05	41	0.14	64	0.05	37	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.62	7	0.03	41	0.05	35	0.15	75	0.04	38	0.08
Hatto 1993		45	0.51	88	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.04	65	0.04
Hatto 1997		40	0.52	32	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.04	76	0.03
Horowitz 1949		75	0.38	58	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.04	69	0.03
Indjic 1988		39	0.52	60	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.04	57	0.04
Kapell 1951		70	0.40	42	0.00	35	0.05	37	0.15	84	0.03	43	0.07
Kissin 1993		49	0.49	51	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	69	0.03	56	0.04
Kushner 1989		48	0.50	83	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	74	0.04	53	0.04
Luisada 1991		21	0.61	89	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.30	71	0.04	28	0.11
Lushtak 2004		34	0.54	78	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	82	0.03	63	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.51	3	0.08	19	0.11	15	0.40	31	0.20	10	0.28
Magaloff 1978		19	0.62	30	0.00	13	0.10	12	0.44	20	0.33	5	0.38
Magin 1975		74	0.38	23	0.01	56	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.03	68	0.03
Michalowski 1933		80	0.32	67	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	88	0.02	84	0.02
Milkina 1970		4	0.71	9	0.03	5	0.16	3	0.60	29	0.26	4	0.39
Mohovich 1999		16	0.62	49	0.00	14	0.10	9	0.51	59	0.05	20	0.16
Moravec 1969		13	0.64	4	0.07	4	0.15	5	0.55	6	0.56	1	0.55
Morozova 2008		59	0.44	85	0.00	70	0.05	65	0.05	86	0.02	75	0.03
Neighaus 1950		57	0.45	74	0.00	73	0.04	68	0.04	85	0.02	82	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		38	0.53	25	0.01	29	0.07	23	0.31	77	0.03	33	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		72	0.40	28	0.01	78	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.03
Osinska 1989		2	0.72	1	0.20	1	0.20	2	0.61	33	0.22	7	0.37
Pachmann 1927		69	0.41	64	0.00	84	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.02	70	0.03
Paderewski 1930		24	0.59	76	0.00	38	0.07	30	0.21	84	0.03	36	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		25	0.58	50	0.00	45	0.06	54	0.06	67	0.04	48	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.42	16	0.01	22	0.08	29	0.24	44	0.12	18	0.17
Poblocka 1999		83	0.27	45	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.04	67	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		36	0.54	80	0.00	34	0.06	38	0.15	78	0.03	42	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		18	0.62	17	0.01	39	0.05	34	0.15	73	0.03	41	0.07
Rangell 2001		79	0.33	26	0.01	37	0.06	42	0.12	51	0.04	45	0.07
Richter 1976		85	0.13	38	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	88	0.01	83	0.02
Rosen 1989		17	0.62	22	0.01	8	0.14	13	0.44	72	0.04	23	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.35	47	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	85	0.02	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.40	90	0.00	48	0.09	46	0.09	41	0.15	27	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.41	68	0.00	49	0.10	45	0.10	39	0.13	32	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.37	61	0.00	47	0.06	52	0.06	43	0.11	39	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.44	86	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.19	30	0.20	16	0.19
Rossi 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		27	0.58	13	0.01	17	0.09	16	0.39	40	0.12	14	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		66	0.41	8	0.03	16	0.12	22	0.32	41	0.19	13	0.25
Rubinstein 1966		15	0.62	12	0.02	15	0.10	18	0.35	41	0.18	12	0.25
Schilhawsky 1960		81	0.30	65	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03
Shebanova 2002		63	0.42	81	0.00	69	0.05	63	0.05	83	0.03	60	0.04
Smith 1975		23	0.59	15	0.01	6	0.12	14	0.42	36	0.15	11	0.25
Sokolov 2002		78	0.34	69	0.00	75	0.05	61	0.05	77	0.03	52	0.04
Sztompka 1959		42	0.52	53	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	86	0.02	71	0.03
Tomsic 1995		55	0.47	14	0.01	21	0.08	21	0.34	26	0.40	8	0.37
Uninsky 1932		65	0.42	72	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	83	0.03	77	0.03
Uninsky 1971		84	0.23	46	0.00	80	0.04	75	0.04	83	0.03	73	0.03
Wasowski 1980		22	0.59	5	0.06	18	0.09	17	0.36	44	0.09	17	0.18
Zak 1937		56	0.46	84	0.00	61	0.05	66	0.05	76	0.03	54	0.04
Zak 1951		61	0.44	82	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	73	0.03	55	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.31	54	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	78	0.02	89	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.25	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.14	79	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	59	0.04	80	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).