Rachmaninoff 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		1	0.80	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.60	13	0.43	4	0.51
Anderszewski 2003		8	0.75	29	0.01	24	0.08	25	0.24	32	0.23	29	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.72	3	0.11	5	0.17	6	0.46	5	0.48	6	0.47
Bacha 2000		51	0.63	59	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04	73	0.04
Badura 1965		53	0.63	44	0.00	64	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.05	78	0.04
Barbosa 1983		77	0.49	56	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.04	83	0.03
Biret 1990		27	0.70	69	0.00	47	0.03	75	0.03	37	0.14	65	0.06
Blet 2003		73	0.54	68	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.03
Block 1995		76	0.53	77	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	48	0.06	79	0.04
Blumental 1952		41	0.67	42	0.00	37	0.04	36	0.13	44	0.08	52	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		65	0.59	88	0.00	63	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.71	19	0.01	43	0.04	43	0.08	9	0.45	35	0.19
Bunin 1987		79	0.48	89	0.00	77	0.04	63	0.04	29	0.29	49	0.11
Bunin 1987b		82	0.46	78	0.00	76	0.02	87	0.02	28	0.28	59	0.07
Chiu 1999		45	0.66	86	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.11	34	0.19	43	0.14
Cohen 1997		85	0.37	82	0.00	87	0.03	76	0.03	68	0.03	88	0.03
Cortot 1951		37	0.68	60	0.00	45	0.04	58	0.04	25	0.35	47	0.12
Csalog 1996		87	0.36	57	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Czerny 1949		4	0.78	4	0.08	4	0.18	2	0.58	10	0.53	1	0.55
Czerny 1990		7	0.76	34	0.00	9	0.08	10	0.38	14	0.38	12	0.38
Duchoud 2007		71	0.57	15	0.01	40	0.04	41	0.10	14	0.31	36	0.18
Ezaki 2006		2	0.80	5	0.06	3	0.14	4	0.50	8	0.54	2	0.52
Falvay 1989		74	0.54	71	0.00	82	0.04	66	0.04	40	0.25	51	0.10
Farrell 1958		14	0.73	17	0.01	13	0.07	13	0.36	17	0.44	10	0.40
Ferenczy 1958		81	0.47	72	0.00	86	0.04	71	0.04	76	0.03	86	0.03
Fliere 1977		3	0.78	9	0.02	6	0.11	5	0.49	29	0.21	19	0.32
Fou 1978		30	0.69	18	0.01	32	0.06	33	0.15	29	0.20	37	0.17
Francois 1956		55	0.62	63	0.00	68	0.05	52	0.05	35	0.16	54	0.09
Friedman 1923		17	0.72	48	0.00	39	0.05	34	0.14	34	0.34	31	0.22
Friedman 1923b		18	0.71	36	0.00	34	0.06	31	0.19	33	0.35	24	0.26
Friedman 1930		23	0.71	50	0.00	41	0.05	38	0.13	34	0.33	32	0.21
Garcia 2007		13	0.73	41	0.00	21	0.07	24	0.30	17	0.42	14	0.35
Garcia 2007b		43	0.66	45	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	36	0.20	50	0.11
Gierzod 1998		10	0.74	66	0.00	8	0.08	8	0.43	28	0.27	15	0.34
Gornostaeva 1994		58	0.62	61	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.05	81	0.04
Groot 1988		44	0.66	31	0.00	26	0.06	27	0.22	15	0.41	21	0.30
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.74	24	0.01	14	0.07	16	0.35	35	0.14	30	0.22
Hatto 1993		46	0.65	70	0.00	59	0.06	46	0.06	54	0.06	66	0.06
Hatto 1997		40	0.67	64	0.00	58	0.05	50	0.05	53	0.05	72	0.05
Horowitz 1949		35	0.69	30	0.00	35	0.04	42	0.09	25	0.43	33	0.20
Indjic 1988		39	0.67	79	0.00	57	0.04	69	0.04	49	0.06	71	0.05
Kapell 1951		59	0.62	87	0.00	30	0.05	26	0.23	52	0.05	48	0.11
Kissin 1993		15	0.73	32	0.00	7	0.12	7	0.44	19	0.40	9	0.42
Kushner 1989		34	0.69	83	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	35	0.17	55	0.08
Luisada 1991		20	0.71	74	0.00	29	0.05	30	0.20	44	0.09	44	0.13
Lushtak 2004		33	0.69	84	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.07	44	0.09	57	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		61	0.60	26	0.01	33	0.06	35	0.13	8	0.44	27	0.24
Magaloff 1978		12	0.73	14	0.02	25	0.06	21	0.31	4	0.50	11	0.39
Magin 1975		32	0.69	2	0.14	2	0.21	3	0.51	5	0.54	3	0.52
Michalowski 1933		72	0.55	27	0.01	73	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.05	77	0.04
Milkina 1970		11	0.73	21	0.01	17	0.07	20	0.33	22	0.34	17	0.33
Mohovich 1999		38	0.68	46	0.00	36	0.04	37	0.13	41	0.18	39	0.15
Moravec 1969		62	0.60	39	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	12	0.49	42	0.14
Morozova 2008		28	0.69	49	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.31	20	0.35	18	0.33
Neighaus 1950		24	0.70	22	0.01	38	0.04	39	0.11	70	0.04	62	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		25	0.70	12	0.02	11	0.08	12	0.37	6	0.52	7	0.44
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.70	40	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.31	27	0.30	20	0.30
Osinska 1989		6	0.76	25	0.01	18	0.08	17	0.34	28	0.33	16	0.33
Pachmann 1927		64	0.59	47	0.00	78	0.03	86	0.03	35	0.16	60	0.07
Paderewski 1930		66	0.59	65	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	62	0.03	82	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.69	23	0.01	28	0.05	32	0.15	30	0.23	34	0.19
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.48	35	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	19	0.37	46	0.12
Poblocka 1999		69	0.57	75	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.04	74	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		42	0.67	20	0.01	27	0.05	28	0.21	20	0.29	25	0.25
Rachmaninoff 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		86	0.36	80	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	54	0.04	89	0.03
Richter 1976		75	0.53	58	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	40	0.20	56	0.08
Rosen 1989		50	0.63	85	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.08	64	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		48	0.64	6	0.03	15	0.07	15	0.35	5	0.62	5	0.47
Rosenthal 1931		67	0.59	52	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	6	0.57	38	0.17
Rosenthal 1931b		63	0.60	37	0.00	46	0.03	82	0.03	5	0.59	45	0.13
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.57	7	0.02	48	0.04	72	0.04	7	0.53	41	0.15
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.59	13	0.02	50	0.04	54	0.04	7	0.57	40	0.15
Rossi 2007		56	0.62	11	0.02	72	0.03	73	0.03	34	0.15	58	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		60	0.60	8	0.02	65	0.04	64	0.04	52	0.05	75	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.42	53	0.00	70	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.08	67	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		52	0.63	73	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	44	0.11	61	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		21	0.71	16	0.01	16	0.07	9	0.40	15	0.48	8	0.44
Shebanova 2002		36	0.68	10	0.02	10	0.08	14	0.36	38	0.19	23	0.26
Smith 1975		54	0.62	33	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	49	0.05	69	0.05
Sokolov 2002		49	0.63	51	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.20	17	0.33	22	0.26
Sztompka 1959		5	0.77	55	0.00	12	0.09	11	0.38	22	0.32	13	0.35
Tomsic 1995		84	0.39	76	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	65	0.05	76	0.04
Uninsky 1932		57	0.62	38	0.00	61	0.06	47	0.06	52	0.06	63	0.06
Uninsky 1971		78	0.49	28	0.01	75	0.03	77	0.03	45	0.09	70	0.05
Wasowski 1980		47	0.65	54	0.00	62	0.06	45	0.06	65	0.05	68	0.05
Zak 1937		22	0.71	43	0.00	20	0.08	19	0.34	35	0.16	28	0.23
Zak 1951		31	0.69	62	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.34	32	0.18	26	0.25
Random 1		89	-0.22	67	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	53	0.04	87	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.01	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	7	0.44	53	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.23	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).