Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.76	15	0.01	8	0.18	7	0.54	17	0.40	11	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		10	0.75	10	0.01	16	0.08	26	0.30	12	0.33	25	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.76	24	0.01	11	0.10	10	0.48	4	0.52	8	0.50
Bacha 2000		40	0.65	69	0.00	59	0.07	45	0.07	24	0.21	44	0.12
Badura 1965		42	0.64	70	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	28	0.41	33	0.21
Barbosa 1983		76	0.46	13	0.01	71	0.03	80	0.03	47	0.07	69	0.05
Biret 1990		51	0.62	78	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.04	80	0.04
Blet 2003		64	0.54	73	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	43	0.09	65	0.06
Block 1995		73	0.50	79	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	30	0.17	56	0.09
Blumental 1952		70	0.50	88	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	56	0.04	78	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.71	46	0.00	23	0.07	19	0.38	23	0.42	16	0.40
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.63	76	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.14	61	0.07
Bunin 1987		68	0.52	44	0.00	50	0.04	68	0.04	16	0.45	43	0.13
Bunin 1987b		69	0.51	51	0.00	49	0.04	65	0.04	16	0.45	42	0.13
Chiu 1999		57	0.57	75	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.13	32	0.21	36	0.17
Cohen 1997		84	0.38	45	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	53	0.05	79	0.04
Cortot 1951		54	0.58	89	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	35	0.16	60	0.08
Csalog 1996		86	0.33	32	0.00	69	0.03	87	0.03	70	0.03	88	0.03
Czerny 1949		17	0.71	85	0.00	17	0.05	18	0.38	28	0.39	18	0.38
Czerny 1990		31	0.67	9	0.01	37	0.05	43	0.11	56	0.04	62	0.07
Duchoud 2007		11	0.74	17	0.01	9	0.14	8	0.54	1	0.68	3	0.61
Ezaki 2006		41	0.64	33	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	61	0.04	72	0.04
Falvay 1989		83	0.39	34	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.04	85	0.03
Farrell 1958		44	0.64	27	0.01	15	0.08	42	0.13	50	0.06	55	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		72	0.50	82	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	47	0.07	70	0.05
Fliere 1977		4	0.81	4	0.07	4	0.15	6	0.57	15	0.41	9	0.48
Fou 1978		45	0.63	57	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.14	44	0.08	50	0.11
Francois 1956		52	0.61	68	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	33	0.20	54	0.10
Friedman 1923		29	0.68	66	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	39	0.28	49	0.12
Friedman 1923b		32	0.67	65	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.28	47	0.12
Friedman 1930		39	0.65	31	0.00	58	0.06	46	0.06	39	0.26	46	0.12
Garcia 2007		22	0.70	80	0.00	25	0.05	21	0.33	11	0.50	15	0.41
Garcia 2007b		21	0.70	83	0.00	14	0.10	17	0.40	14	0.47	13	0.43
Gierzod 1998		5	0.80	6	0.02	5	0.18	3	0.61	7	0.54	4	0.57
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.66	20	0.01	54	0.06	47	0.06	27	0.20	51	0.11
Groot 1988		60	0.56	60	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.15	42	0.17	39	0.16
Harasiewicz 1955		27	0.68	19	0.01	19	0.05	16	0.40	22	0.32	22	0.36
Hatto 1993		20	0.71	84	0.00	32	0.11	24	0.32	24	0.30	27	0.31
Hatto 1997		16	0.71	42	0.00	31	0.09	23	0.32	25	0.30	26	0.31
Horowitz 1949		49	0.62	86	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	29	0.40	40	0.15
Indjic 1988		13	0.72	50	0.00	30	0.06	22	0.33	25	0.30	24	0.31
Kapell 1951		53	0.61	56	0.00	24	0.06	30	0.27	28	0.16	32	0.21
Kissin 1993		36	0.65	29	0.00	39	0.08	31	0.25	38	0.13	35	0.18
Kushner 1989		8	0.76	12	0.01	12	0.10	15	0.40	7	0.53	10	0.46
Luisada 1991		33	0.66	16	0.01	40	0.06	39	0.15	64	0.04	58	0.08
Lushtak 2004		37	0.65	40	0.00	43	0.07	38	0.15	29	0.20	38	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		74	0.48	52	0.00	77	0.05	56	0.05	51	0.05	67	0.05
Magaloff 1978		59	0.56	30	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	62	0.05	73	0.04
Magin 1975		12	0.72	14	0.01	3	0.16	5	0.58	10	0.50	6	0.54
Michalowski 1933		26	0.69	61	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.27	12	0.48	20	0.36
Milkina 1970		34	0.66	49	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	46	0.07	64	0.06
Mohovich 1999		19	0.71	21	0.01	33	0.08	25	0.31	11	0.52	17	0.40
Moravec 1969		87	0.28	63	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03
Morozova 2008		28	0.68	37	0.00	26	0.07	20	0.37	21	0.35	21	0.36
Neighaus 1950		1	0.84	2	0.11	2	0.29	2	0.65	2	0.62	2	0.63
Niedzielski 1931		55	0.58	54	0.00	62	0.03	75	0.03	52	0.04	86	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		25	0.69	35	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.17	46	0.06	52	0.10
Pachmann 1927		58	0.57	55	0.00	65	0.04	63	0.04	17	0.35	45	0.12
Paderewski 1930		61	0.56	74	0.00	74	0.05	54	0.05	67	0.03	75	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.63	43	0.00	29	0.06	33	0.19	33	0.20	34	0.19
Pierdomenico 2008		63	0.55	5	0.04	13	0.10	34	0.17	5	0.47	31	0.28
Poblocka 1999		48	0.62	18	0.01	10	0.16	11	0.46	16	0.45	12	0.45
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.53	36	0.00	70	0.03	86	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.70	72	0.00	34	0.07	27	0.30	23	0.31	28	0.30
Rangell 2001		71	0.50	67	0.00	66	0.04	74	0.04	23	0.34	48	0.12
Richter 1976		67	0.53	28	0.01	60	0.05	49	0.05	26	0.41	41	0.14
Rosen 1989		23	0.70	64	0.00	27	0.06	28	0.30	23	0.28	30	0.29
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.48	58	0.00	76	0.04	64	0.04	41	0.09	66	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.43	62	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	52	0.05	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.43	87	0.00	84	0.04	70	0.04	48	0.06	71	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.42	7	0.02	83	0.03	85	0.03	56	0.04	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.42	71	0.00	85	0.04	66	0.04	63	0.04	81	0.04
Rossi 2007		82	0.40	22	0.01	86	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		65	0.54	47	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	74	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		85	0.36	23	0.01	79	0.05	55	0.05	71	0.04	82	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.62	48	0.00	67	0.03	82	0.03	50	0.05	77	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.67	11	0.01	18	0.06	14	0.40	23	0.45	14	0.42
Shebanova 2002		2	0.83	1	0.42	1	0.41	1	0.69	5	0.60	1	0.64
Smith 1975		38	0.65	53	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	42	0.08	63	0.06
Sokolov 2002		6	0.77	3	0.08	7	0.22	9	0.51	1	0.61	5	0.56
Sztompka 1959		3	0.82	8	0.01	6	0.22	4	0.60	11	0.44	7	0.51
Tomsic 1995		77	0.45	39	0.00	78	0.04	67	0.04	52	0.07	68	0.05
Uninsky 1932		56	0.57	59	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.15	41	0.20	37	0.17
Uninsky 1971		62	0.56	26	0.01	20	0.05	32	0.24	32	0.34	29	0.29
Wasowski 1980		43	0.64	38	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	36	0.14	59	0.08
Zak 1937		15	0.71	25	0.01	22	0.06	13	0.41	19	0.29	23	0.34
Zak 1951		18	0.71	41	0.00	21	0.05	12	0.41	17	0.32	19	0.36
Random 1		90	-0.26	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	52	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	0.03	77	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	4	0.50	53	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.03	81	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	13	0.45	57	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).