Kissin 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		1	0.88	2	0.19	2	0.37	2	0.71	1	0.61	2	0.66
Anderszewski 2003		38	0.68	30	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.10	37	0.21	43	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.66	61	0.00	26	0.06	31	0.21	22	0.29	32	0.25
Bacha 2000		85	0.43	67	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	58	0.04	85	0.03
Badura 1965		32	0.70	47	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.22	14	0.53	25	0.34
Barbosa 1983		86	0.39	37	0.00	86	0.04	58	0.04	67	0.04	81	0.04
Biret 1990		52	0.65	31	0.00	49	0.04	49	0.04	32	0.18	71	0.08
Blet 2003		28	0.72	50	0.00	32	0.07	37	0.18	19	0.34	31	0.25
Block 1995		68	0.58	65	0.00	66	0.03	66	0.03	57	0.04	87	0.03
Blumental 1952		64	0.60	10	0.01	33	0.07	35	0.19	22	0.20	39	0.19
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.79	3	0.09	4	0.15	15	0.44	15	0.52	12	0.48
Brailowsky 1960		79	0.52	80	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.03
Bunin 1987		81	0.50	77	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	40	0.19	74	0.06
Bunin 1987b		82	0.49	59	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	39	0.19	69	0.08
Chiu 1999		77	0.53	74	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	45	0.05	80	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.31	58	0.00	87	0.04	57	0.04	63	0.04	83	0.04
Cortot 1951		44	0.66	57	0.00	62	0.04	48	0.04	27	0.29	59	0.11
Csalog 1996		75	0.53	20	0.01	75	0.03	75	0.03	32	0.20	70	0.08
Czerny 1949		24	0.74	51	0.00	10	0.13	11	0.48	14	0.51	11	0.49
Czerny 1990		12	0.79	52	0.00	15	0.11	16	0.43	8	0.46	17	0.44
Duchoud 2007		80	0.52	32	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	46	0.07	77	0.05
Ezaki 2006		22	0.75	45	0.00	25	0.06	24	0.33	11	0.49	22	0.40
Falvay 1989		72	0.54	9	0.02	76	0.03	82	0.03	41	0.22	68	0.08
Farrell 1958		53	0.65	81	0.00	48	0.04	52	0.04	27	0.31	52	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		66	0.59	70	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	51	0.05	82	0.04
Fliere 1977		8	0.80	16	0.01	6	0.16	8	0.51	12	0.42	14	0.46
Fou 1978		21	0.75	24	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.33	17	0.34	26	0.33
Francois 1956		59	0.63	53	0.00	60	0.03	68	0.03	25	0.29	67	0.09
Friedman 1923		49	0.65	78	0.00	57	0.03	78	0.03	26	0.41	60	0.11
Friedman 1923b		50	0.65	85	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	26	0.42	47	0.13
Friedman 1930		56	0.64	86	0.00	61	0.03	72	0.03	31	0.37	58	0.11
Garcia 2007		27	0.73	87	0.00	35	0.05	39	0.12	27	0.30	38	0.19
Garcia 2007b		36	0.69	82	0.00	46	0.04	61	0.04	34	0.24	64	0.10
Gierzod 1998		2	0.86	1	0.34	1	0.34	1	0.72	2	0.68	1	0.70
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.62	42	0.00	65	0.03	74	0.03	42	0.09	78	0.05
Groot 1988		69	0.57	88	0.00	73	0.03	67	0.03	66	0.04	89	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.76	12	0.01	18	0.11	10	0.49	11	0.43	16	0.46
Hatto 1993		47	0.66	54	0.00	40	0.08	33	0.20	29	0.28	35	0.24
Hatto 1997		42	0.67	35	0.00	39	0.05	34	0.20	28	0.29	34	0.24
Horowitz 1949		29	0.72	60	0.00	36	0.05	40	0.12	14	0.48	33	0.24
Indjic 1988		41	0.67	79	0.00	38	0.05	32	0.21	24	0.31	30	0.26
Kapell 1951		33	0.70	41	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.25	47	0.05	53	0.11
Kissin 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1989		17	0.76	15	0.01	28	0.08	27	0.26	21	0.38	29	0.31
Luisada 1991		13	0.78	6	0.03	8	0.11	14	0.47	5	0.47	13	0.47
Lushtak 2004		39	0.68	66	0.00	42	0.04	44	0.08	26	0.21	46	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		62	0.62	17	0.01	64	0.03	80	0.03	15	0.32	62	0.10
Magaloff 1978		61	0.62	46	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	19	0.33	51	0.11
Magin 1975		14	0.78	22	0.01	20	0.09	18	0.40	15	0.45	21	0.42
Michalowski 1933		51	0.65	64	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	23	0.28	56	0.11
Milkina 1970		15	0.77	7	0.03	11	0.13	9	0.50	6	0.56	7	0.53
Mohovich 1999		40	0.67	23	0.01	34	0.08	36	0.18	36	0.27	36	0.22
Moravec 1969		78	0.53	71	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	39	0.14	75	0.05
Morozova 2008		6	0.81	48	0.00	12	0.12	12	0.48	2	0.56	10	0.52
Neighaus 1950		35	0.69	38	0.00	24	0.08	26	0.30	27	0.36	27	0.33
Niedzielski 1931		34	0.70	75	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.24	21	0.43	28	0.32
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.65	25	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.13	31	0.25	40	0.18
Osinska 1989		20	0.76	29	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.43	11	0.50	15	0.46
Pachmann 1927		55	0.64	68	0.00	67	0.03	65	0.03	15	0.37	55	0.11
Paderewski 1930		45	0.66	72	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	22	0.32	54	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.76	69	0.00	19	0.10	21	0.39	13	0.46	19	0.42
Pierdomenico 2008		67	0.58	5	0.03	69	0.04	59	0.04	22	0.36	48	0.12
Poblocka 1999		4	0.81	18	0.01	9	0.15	5	0.54	5	0.55	3	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932		37	0.69	49	0.00	45	0.04	50	0.04	25	0.24	61	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		26	0.73	36	0.00	17	0.10	19	0.40	7	0.44	20	0.42
Rangell 2001		84	0.44	39	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	46	0.05	84	0.04
Richter 1976		31	0.70	21	0.01	47	0.04	53	0.04	13	0.52	42	0.14
Rosen 1989		23	0.74	33	0.00	23	0.08	25	0.33	18	0.38	24	0.35
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.63	76	0.00	56	0.03	83	0.03	11	0.34	63	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.54	44	0.00	71	0.04	54	0.04	23	0.30	57	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.53	89	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	23	0.27	66	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		71	0.55	55	0.00	68	0.05	47	0.05	23	0.31	50	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.53	83	0.00	70	0.03	70	0.03	25	0.25	65	0.09
Rossi 2007		83	0.49	56	0.00	84	0.03	69	0.03	49	0.06	79	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.65	62	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	13	0.38	49	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		70	0.56	13	0.01	44	0.05	43	0.09	35	0.31	41	0.17
Rubinstein 1966		63	0.61	26	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.10	25	0.35	37	0.19
Schilhawsky 1960		9	0.80	8	0.03	5	0.15	13	0.48	6	0.58	8	0.53
Shebanova 2002		7	0.81	4	0.04	3	0.19	3	0.61	8	0.48	5	0.54
Smith 1975		43	0.66	19	0.01	58	0.03	71	0.03	38	0.10	76	0.05
Sokolov 2002		57	0.64	14	0.01	50	0.05	46	0.05	16	0.34	44	0.13
Sztompka 1959		10	0.79	11	0.01	7	0.13	4	0.55	9	0.49	9	0.52
Tomsic 1995		65	0.60	43	0.00	74	0.04	55	0.04	19	0.44	45	0.13
Uninsky 1932		16	0.77	63	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.40	14	0.47	18	0.43
Uninsky 1971		25	0.74	34	0.00	27	0.06	22	0.37	24	0.40	23	0.38
Wasowski 1980		30	0.70	40	0.00	52	0.05	45	0.05	47	0.08	72	0.06
Zak 1937		3	0.82	27	0.00	13	0.14	6	0.53	3	0.54	6	0.53
Zak 1951		5	0.81	28	0.00	14	0.18	7	0.53	3	0.55	4	0.54
Random 1		89	-0.22	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	56	0.04	88	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.10	73	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	30	0.17	73	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.25	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).