Harasiewicz 1955

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		3	0.82	15	0.01	9	0.11	8	0.49	11	0.45	10	0.47
Anderszewski 2003		2	0.82	21	0.01	22	0.08	14	0.40	4	0.46	18	0.43
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.73	51	0.00	16	0.06	17	0.38	8	0.47	20	0.42
Bacha 2000		66	0.57	79	0.00	72	0.05	66	0.05	72	0.04	72	0.04
Badura 1965		4	0.81	9	0.02	23	0.10	23	0.32	4	0.60	15	0.44
Barbosa 1983		70	0.56	52	0.00	71	0.03	79	0.03	54	0.05	78	0.04
Biret 1990		56	0.64	20	0.01	51	0.05	55	0.05	33	0.18	59	0.09
Blet 2003		51	0.65	27	0.00	63	0.06	53	0.06	51	0.06	65	0.06
Block 1995		32	0.73	46	0.00	32	0.05	41	0.11	2	0.45	36	0.22
Blumental 1952		62	0.60	36	0.00	56	0.06	52	0.06	32	0.13	58	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		5	0.80	1	0.22	1	0.22	4	0.53	1	0.62	4	0.57
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.65	60	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	50	0.05	73	0.04
Bunin 1987		67	0.56	80	0.00	38	0.04	34	0.15	11	0.49	34	0.27
Bunin 1987b		71	0.55	89	0.00	37	0.04	33	0.16	11	0.49	31	0.28
Chiu 1999		37	0.72	48	0.00	54	0.05	65	0.05	30	0.23	51	0.11
Cohen 1997		81	0.38	64	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		35	0.73	31	0.00	24	0.06	24	0.32	2	0.61	16	0.44
Csalog 1996		82	0.37	18	0.01	66	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.05	79	0.04
Czerny 1949		8	0.78	5	0.07	6	0.12	9	0.45	15	0.51	9	0.48
Czerny 1990		36	0.72	13	0.01	53	0.04	70	0.04	43	0.10	68	0.06
Duchoud 2007		60	0.62	65	0.00	39	0.04	44	0.09	7	0.46	37	0.20
Ezaki 2006		1	0.86	4	0.08	5	0.13	3	0.56	1	0.61	3	0.58
Falvay 1989		77	0.46	14	0.01	86	0.03	82	0.03	61	0.05	74	0.04
Farrell 1958		52	0.65	72	0.00	67	0.04	76	0.04	45	0.11	62	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		42	0.69	32	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	19	0.33	47	0.13
Fliere 1977		6	0.79	22	0.01	10	0.09	10	0.44	18	0.38	21	0.41
Fou 1978		25	0.74	33	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	24	0.30	48	0.12
Francois 1956		69	0.56	44	0.00	75	0.05	54	0.05	56	0.04	81	0.04
Friedman 1923		9	0.78	90	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.18	11	0.52	29	0.31
Friedman 1923b		11	0.77	47	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.22	11	0.54	27	0.34
Friedman 1930		13	0.76	43	0.00	46	0.07	45	0.07	9	0.54	39	0.19
Garcia 2007		40	0.71	87	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	18	0.38	46	0.15
Garcia 2007b		49	0.66	63	0.00	41	0.04	38	0.12	30	0.28	42	0.18
Gierzod 1998		33	0.73	23	0.01	27	0.10	26	0.31	24	0.34	28	0.32
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.63	57	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	29	0.20	57	0.10
Groot 1988		64	0.60	81	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	31	0.26	54	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		26	0.74	42	0.00	44	0.06	40	0.12	31	0.24	44	0.17
Hatto 1997		16	0.76	62	0.00	43	0.06	39	0.12	29	0.25	43	0.17
Horowitz 1949		7	0.79	12	0.02	8	0.14	6	0.50	2	0.59	5	0.54
Indjic 1988		14	0.76	26	0.01	42	0.04	37	0.13	29	0.25	41	0.18
Kapell 1951		55	0.64	3	0.08	4	0.13	5	0.52	1	0.48	7	0.50
Kissin 1993		19	0.76	29	0.00	20	0.09	11	0.43	10	0.49	11	0.46
Kushner 1989		45	0.68	30	0.00	57	0.05	64	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.05
Luisada 1991		21	0.75	75	0.00	45	0.05	61	0.05	40	0.13	60	0.08
Lushtak 2004		39	0.71	24	0.01	55	0.06	50	0.06	23	0.24	49	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.65	8	0.03	12	0.10	27	0.30	1	0.62	17	0.43
Magaloff 1978		74	0.49	84	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.04	83	0.03
Magin 1975		41	0.70	35	0.00	14	0.07	19	0.37	14	0.45	22	0.41
Michalowski 1933		47	0.67	66	0.00	36	0.05	32	0.17	14	0.44	33	0.27
Milkina 1970		28	0.74	6	0.03	13	0.08	25	0.32	13	0.48	23	0.39
Mohovich 1999		48	0.66	49	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	38	0.21	53	0.11
Moravec 1969		79	0.44	59	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.04	82	0.03
Morozova 2008		22	0.75	85	0.00	35	0.05	36	0.13	26	0.27	38	0.19
Neighaus 1950		29	0.74	58	0.00	21	0.08	21	0.33	20	0.40	26	0.36
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.63	73	0.00	58	0.04	74	0.04	74	0.03	84	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.68	19	0.01	26	0.08	22	0.32	16	0.40	25	0.36
Osinska 1989		20	0.76	28	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.22	26	0.34	32	0.27
Pachmann 1927		59	0.63	76	0.00	70	0.04	73	0.04	24	0.27	55	0.10
Paderewski 1930		65	0.60	50	0.00	68	0.03	80	0.03	37	0.14	64	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		27	0.74	86	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	34	0.19	50	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.44	37	0.00	73	0.04	68	0.04	52	0.06	69	0.05
Poblocka 1999		34	0.73	10	0.02	7	0.13	7	0.50	7	0.54	6	0.52
Rabcewiczowa 1932		72	0.54	45	0.00	74	0.05	63	0.05	77	0.04	77	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.74	70	0.00	40	0.05	35	0.14	16	0.35	35	0.22
Rangell 2001		80	0.43	67	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	10	0.41	45	0.16
Richter 1976		23	0.75	11	0.02	19	0.08	15	0.40	5	0.61	8	0.49
Rosen 1989		46	0.67	41	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	35	0.17	56	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.49	38	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	22	0.25	52	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.34	82	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.34	74	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.05	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		86	0.31	54	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	54	0.05	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.35	88	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	65	0.04	86	0.03
Rossi 2007		61	0.62	7	0.03	76	0.04	75	0.04	35	0.15	61	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		73	0.53	69	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.05	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		87	0.30	55	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	69	0.05	80	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		68	0.56	39	0.00	29	0.05	43	0.09	63	0.04	66	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		18	0.76	25	0.01	18	0.08	18	0.37	11	0.54	12	0.45
Shebanova 2002		38	0.72	17	0.01	28	0.15	20	0.33	31	0.27	30	0.30
Smith 1975		54	0.64	71	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.04
Sokolov 2002		63	0.60	77	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.28	5	0.48	24	0.37
Sztompka 1959		12	0.77	40	0.00	15	0.07	12	0.43	14	0.41	19	0.42
Tomsic 1995		76	0.48	34	0.00	78	0.05	62	0.05	53	0.07	63	0.06
Uninsky 1932		17	0.76	61	0.00	17	0.07	16	0.39	7	0.52	13	0.45
Uninsky 1971		43	0.69	16	0.01	11	0.09	13	0.42	6	0.47	14	0.44
Wasowski 1980		30	0.73	56	0.00	34	0.05	42	0.11	17	0.30	40	0.18
Zak 1937		10	0.78	2	0.20	2	0.20	1	0.58	2	0.64	1	0.61
Zak 1951		15	0.76	53	0.00	3	0.18	2	0.56	2	0.63	2	0.59
Random 1		89	-0.15	83	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	18	0.28	71	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.15	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.13	68	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	17	0.37	67	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).