Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		3	0.80	89	0.00	4	0.14	4	0.56	33	0.27	12	0.39
Anderszewski 2003		45	0.66	12	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	43	0.12	44	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.68	43	0.00	45	0.07	47	0.07	73	0.04	63	0.05
Bacha 2000		60	0.59	28	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.04	66	0.04
Badura 1965		65	0.57	78	0.00	71	0.03	79	0.03	48	0.07	62	0.05
Barbosa 1983		85	0.44	67	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.03	82	0.03
Biret 1990		11	0.73	80	0.00	8	0.11	8	0.54	9	0.51	5	0.52
Blet 2003		23	0.70	37	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.27	15	0.37	19	0.32
Block 1995		71	0.54	52	0.00	34	0.06	41	0.15	77	0.03	53	0.07
Blumental 1952		26	0.70	49	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.23	34	0.13	35	0.17
Boshniakovich 1969		32	0.68	24	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.13	55	0.05	49	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.55	45	0.00	63	0.03	74	0.03	70	0.04	79	0.03
Bunin 1987		80	0.46	33	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	49	0.07	74	0.04
Bunin 1987b		81	0.45	82	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	47	0.07	71	0.04
Chiu 1999		59	0.59	26	0.00	59	0.05	56	0.05	80	0.03	67	0.04
Cohen 1997		86	0.44	7	0.01	80	0.03	81	0.03	30	0.26	47	0.09
Cortot 1951		8	0.75	5	0.02	18	0.08	16	0.45	7	0.51	7	0.48
Csalog 1996		82	0.45	30	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.04	84	0.03
Czerny 1949		22	0.70	20	0.00	17	0.08	20	0.37	39	0.28	20	0.32
Czerny 1990		29	0.69	90	0.00	35	0.06	37	0.18	53	0.04	50	0.08
Duchoud 2007		46	0.66	23	0.00	33	0.06	42	0.14	9	0.41	29	0.24
Ezaki 2006		37	0.67	81	0.00	56	0.07	48	0.07	77	0.03	56	0.05
Falvay 1989		79	0.46	46	0.00	87	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.05	69	0.04
Farrell 1958		17	0.72	9	0.01	9	0.10	9	0.52	5	0.53	3	0.52
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.60	68	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.05
Fliere 1977		4	0.78	61	0.00	5	0.12	5	0.56	27	0.26	13	0.38
Fou 1978		5	0.77	34	0.00	6	0.18	6	0.54	12	0.42	6	0.48
Francois 1956		51	0.62	79	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	26	0.28	41	0.13
Friedman 1923		52	0.62	50	0.00	67	0.06	53	0.06	69	0.04	65	0.05
Friedman 1923b		53	0.62	74	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04	75	0.04
Friedman 1930		54	0.62	29	0.00	68	0.03	71	0.03	70	0.04	85	0.03
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		1	0.91	1	0.78	1	0.77	1	0.84	1	0.84	1	0.84
Gierzod 1998		9	0.75	27	0.00	15	0.11	12	0.47	37	0.18	24	0.29
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.61	18	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.05
Groot 1988		61	0.58	31	0.00	24	0.07	36	0.19	49	0.06	43	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.71	35	0.00	19	0.09	18	0.38	46	0.06	38	0.15
Hatto 1993		43	0.67	69	0.00	41	0.06	35	0.20	37	0.17	34	0.18
Hatto 1997		34	0.68	83	0.00	39	0.05	30	0.23	38	0.17	32	0.20
Horowitz 1949		42	0.67	36	0.00	53	0.07	49	0.07	41	0.24	40	0.13
Indjic 1988		33	0.68	64	0.00	40	0.08	31	0.23	37	0.18	31	0.20
Kapell 1951		27	0.69	15	0.00	14	0.09	13	0.46	32	0.14	28	0.25
Kissin 1993		14	0.73	84	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.30	39	0.12	33	0.19
Kushner 1989		28	0.69	47	0.00	25	0.06	23	0.35	29	0.30	18	0.32
Luisada 1991		30	0.69	88	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.05	57	0.05
Lushtak 2004		38	0.67	32	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.17	38	0.13	37	0.15
Malcuzynski 1961		64	0.57	19	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	36	0.15	46	0.09
Magaloff 1978		63	0.57	21	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	65	0.05	68	0.04
Magin 1975		15	0.73	25	0.00	21	0.09	19	0.38	32	0.22	21	0.29
Michalowski 1933		50	0.63	53	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	43	0.11	52	0.07
Milkina 1970		39	0.67	70	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05	59	0.05
Mohovich 1999		49	0.65	58	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	46	0.08	45	0.10
Moravec 1969		69	0.55	6	0.01	73	0.04	65	0.04	37	0.15	48	0.08
Morozova 2008		21	0.70	75	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.15	40	0.13	39	0.14
Neighaus 1950		25	0.70	85	0.00	26	0.06	22	0.35	33	0.20	27	0.26
Niedzielski 1931		40	0.67	3	0.02	22	0.07	26	0.32	25	0.38	16	0.35
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.70	54	0.00	13	0.08	11	0.50	21	0.33	9	0.41
Osinska 1989		7	0.76	55	0.00	7	0.12	7	0.54	21	0.41	8	0.47
Pachmann 1927		74	0.52	59	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	57	0.04	81	0.03
Paderewski 1930		36	0.68	16	0.00	42	0.09	33	0.22	18	0.38	22	0.29
Perlemuter 1992		6	0.77	17	0.00	2	0.26	3	0.62	2	0.58	2	0.60
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.53	8	0.01	23	0.06	39	0.17	15	0.40	25	0.26
Poblocka 1999		35	0.68	72	0.00	20	0.10	21	0.36	29	0.29	17	0.32
Rabcewiczowa 1932		41	0.67	44	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.20	37	0.13	36	0.16
Rachmaninoff 1923		12	0.73	2	0.03	12	0.10	17	0.42	24	0.30	15	0.35
Rangell 2001		87	0.41	65	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	49	0.05	76	0.04
Richter 1976		70	0.55	62	0.00	72	0.04	64	0.04	44	0.12	51	0.07
Rosen 1989		18	0.71	66	0.00	28	0.05	25	0.33	33	0.18	30	0.24
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.54	77	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	35	0.11	55	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.47	73	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	64	0.04	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.48	38	0.00	75	0.02	84	0.02	52	0.06	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.47	22	0.00	77	0.03	69	0.03	55	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.49	86	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	51	0.05	77	0.04
Rossi 2007		66	0.57	10	0.01	64	0.03	76	0.03	39	0.14	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		62	0.58	41	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	44	0.07	58	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.44	56	0.00	78	0.03	68	0.03	67	0.05	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		67	0.55	4	0.02	61	0.04	62	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		24	0.70	14	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.45	34	0.36	10	0.40
Shebanova 2002		16	0.73	60	0.00	10	0.11	10	0.52	33	0.25	14	0.36
Smith 1975		57	0.60	39	0.00	65	0.03	72	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03
Sokolov 2002		55	0.62	42	0.00	50	0.06	52	0.06	31	0.20	42	0.11
Sztompka 1959		2	0.82	11	0.01	3	0.34	2	0.65	16	0.41	4	0.52
Tomsic 1995		83	0.44	40	0.00	86	0.03	70	0.03	57	0.06	72	0.04
Uninsky 1932		13	0.73	63	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.34	36	0.25	23	0.29
Uninsky 1971		47	0.66	13	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.25	37	0.28	26	0.26
Wasowski 1980		10	0.74	48	0.00	11	0.11	15	0.45	12	0.33	11	0.39
Zak 1937		44	0.67	87	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	66	0.04	70	0.04
Zak 1951		48	0.66	71	0.00	55	0.08	46	0.08	76	0.03	60	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.27	51	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	61	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.09	76	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	49	0.04	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.19	57	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	56	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).