Friedman 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.79	32	0.00	12	0.15	10	0.53	35	0.26	17	0.37
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.75	2	0.00	19	0.09	35	0.33	19	0.27	23	0.30
Ashkenazy 1981		25	0.71	17	0.00	17	0.10	25	0.42	25	0.27	18	0.34
Bacha 2000		40	0.64	44	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	60	0.04	49	0.06
Badura 1965		18	0.73	33	0.00	39	0.07	28	0.39	24	0.44	15	0.41
Barbosa 1983		52	0.59	61	0.00	65	0.06	53	0.06	37	0.12	47	0.08
Biret 1990		60	0.58	45	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.03	81	0.03
Blet 2003		54	0.59	21	0.00	54	0.04	73	0.04	57	0.05	69	0.04
Block 1995		58	0.58	62	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	68	0.04	71	0.04
Blumental 1952		61	0.57	34	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	64	0.04	48	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		31	0.68	46	0.00	29	0.10	19	0.46	25	0.37	16	0.41
Brailowsky 1960		34	0.65	22	0.00	53	0.06	54	0.06	40	0.13	46	0.09
Bunin 1987		73	0.46	35	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	28	0.29	36	0.14
Bunin 1987b		74	0.44	63	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	29	0.28	38	0.13
Chiu 1999		22	0.72	64	0.00	40	0.09	40	0.26	23	0.25	28	0.25
Cohen 1997		77	0.35	36	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	67	0.04	79	0.03
Cortot 1951		38	0.64	65	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	44	0.08	50	0.06
Csalog 1996		87	0.22	47	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03
Czerny 1949		8	0.79	48	0.00	6	0.17	6	0.63	11	0.53	6	0.58
Czerny 1990		15	0.74	6	0.00	20	0.09	22	0.44	36	0.14	29	0.25
Duchoud 2007		72	0.46	66	0.00	71	0.06	50	0.06	65	0.04	57	0.05
Ezaki 2006		6	0.81	13	0.00	13	0.08	23	0.43	17	0.39	13	0.41
Falvay 1989		82	0.30	49	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.02	86	0.02
Farrell 1958		41	0.63	67	0.00	59	0.03	77	0.03	55	0.06	65	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		43	0.62	68	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.16	32	0.14	34	0.15
Fliere 1977		10	0.78	5	0.00	14	0.10	20	0.45	35	0.19	25	0.29
Fou 1978		57	0.58	50	0.00	66	0.05	62	0.05	73	0.04	66	0.04
Francois 1956		65	0.53	69	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	71	0.04	75	0.04
Friedman 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1923b		1	1.00	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Friedman 1930		2	0.95	3	0.00	2	0.76	2	0.83	1	0.87	2	0.85
Garcia 2007		45	0.62	14	0.00	55	0.04	69	0.04	53	0.06	58	0.05
Garcia 2007b		42	0.63	15	0.00	41	0.10	38	0.31	73	0.04	45	0.11
Gierzod 1998		28	0.70	16	0.00	18	0.09	18	0.47	44	0.12	31	0.24
Gornostaeva 1994		59	0.58	70	0.00	51	0.07	47	0.07	65	0.04	59	0.05
Groot 1988		68	0.52	71	0.00	69	0.05	56	0.05	68	0.04	74	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.78	72	0.00	21	0.07	11	0.52	31	0.18	22	0.31
Hatto 1993		5	0.86	11	0.00	4	0.23	5	0.69	4	0.64	5	0.66
Hatto 1997		4	0.86	73	0.00	5	0.31	4	0.69	4	0.64	4	0.66
Horowitz 1949		30	0.69	28	0.00	24	0.09	13	0.51	21	0.46	11	0.48
Indjic 1988		3	0.87	23	0.00	3	0.27	3	0.70	4	0.65	3	0.67
Kapell 1951		63	0.56	74	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.33	68	0.04	42	0.11
Kissin 1993		35	0.65	51	0.00	35	0.06	26	0.41	78	0.03	43	0.11
Kushner 1989		46	0.61	9	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	79	0.03	67	0.04
Luisada 1991		7	0.80	24	0.00	7	0.14	17	0.48	14	0.35	14	0.41
Lushtak 2004		36	0.65	25	0.00	60	0.04	72	0.04	71	0.04	70	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		69	0.51	7	0.00	22	0.06	41	0.23	23	0.25	30	0.24
Magaloff 1978		64	0.55	52	0.00	68	0.05	61	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05
Magin 1975		37	0.65	53	0.00	31	0.08	32	0.37	43	0.08	33	0.17
Michalowski 1933		50	0.60	75	0.00	25	0.09	29	0.38	26	0.27	21	0.32
Milkina 1970		49	0.60	54	0.00	48	0.05	60	0.05	61	0.04	68	0.04
Mohovich 1999		48	0.60	76	0.00	56	0.04	65	0.04	66	0.05	73	0.04
Moravec 1969		75	0.39	55	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.06	51	0.05
Morozova 2008		17	0.73	77	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.37	32	0.22	26	0.29
Neighaus 1950		12	0.78	78	0.00	8	0.17	8	0.57	16	0.45	9	0.51
Niedzielski 1931		14	0.74	18	0.00	11	0.15	14	0.50	8	0.50	10	0.50
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.68	8	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.28	53	0.05	41	0.12
Osinska 1989		27	0.71	79	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.37	61	0.04	40	0.12
Pachmann 1927		67	0.52	37	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Paderewski 1930		66	0.53	80	0.00	70	0.07	48	0.07	70	0.03	55	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.61	38	0.00	57	0.06	52	0.06	54	0.04	52	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.33	29	0.00	75	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.05	62	0.04
Poblocka 1999		55	0.58	81	0.00	42	0.15	36	0.33	63	0.05	37	0.13
Rabcewiczowa 1932		70	0.49	39	0.00	72	0.05	59	0.05	87	0.03	64	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		23	0.72	26	0.00	37	0.08	34	0.34	34	0.14	32	0.22
Rangell 2001		86	0.24	82	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.03	80	0.03
Richter 1976		53	0.59	19	0.00	28	0.06	42	0.18	24	0.45	27	0.28
Rosen 1989		33	0.66	40	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.36	48	0.06	35	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.37	83	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.31	56	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.30	57	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		84	0.28	58	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.31	27	0.00	84	0.04	74	0.04	82	0.03	82	0.03
Rossi 2007		62	0.56	84	0.00	73	0.05	58	0.05	56	0.06	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.58	20	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		85	0.27	59	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.62	4	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	48	0.06	56	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		26	0.71	10	0.00	23	0.08	12	0.52	28	0.44	12	0.48
Shebanova 2002		29	0.69	30	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.44	77	0.03	44	0.11
Smith 1975		51	0.60	31	0.00	52	0.04	67	0.04	57	0.04	61	0.04
Sokolov 2002		71	0.48	41	0.00	58	0.04	71	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04
Sztompka 1959		20	0.72	12	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.40	72	0.04	39	0.13
Tomsic 1995		83	0.29	60	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.02	87	0.02
Uninsky 1932		21	0.72	85	0.00	10	0.18	9	0.56	13	0.47	8	0.51
Uninsky 1971		39	0.64	86	0.00	9	0.16	7	0.59	12	0.46	7	0.52
Wasowski 1980		24	0.71	42	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.43	26	0.19	24	0.29
Zak 1937		16	0.74	43	0.00	16	0.16	16	0.49	29	0.21	19	0.32
Zak 1951		19	0.73	87	0.00	15	0.11	15	0.50	27	0.21	20	0.32
Random 1		89	-0.25	88	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	36	0.14	72	0.04
Random 2		88	-0.08	89	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	57	0.04	78	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.25	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).