Francois 1956

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		8	0.71	55	0.00	15	0.18	10	0.48	72	0.04	26	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		26	0.64	11	0.02	32	0.06	42	0.11	62	0.04	50	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		59	0.52	41	0.00	61	0.05	48	0.05	61	0.04	70	0.04
Bacha 2000		23	0.64	51	0.00	28	0.09	24	0.30	35	0.13	21	0.20
Badura 1965		69	0.50	30	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	60	0.05	86	0.03
Barbosa 1983		81	0.45	53	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	56	0.05	59	0.05
Biret 1990		17	0.66	37	0.00	16	0.12	15	0.45	24	0.25	11	0.34
Blet 2003		29	0.63	85	0.00	34	0.06	32	0.21	46	0.08	32	0.13
Block 1995		78	0.46	82	0.00	66	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.03
Blumental 1952		24	0.64	10	0.03	12	0.11	9	0.49	31	0.16	16	0.28
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.60	7	0.04	48	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.05	69	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.64	38	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	48	0.05	57	0.05
Bunin 1987		85	0.39	48	0.00	85	0.04	73	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.04
Bunin 1987b		86	0.37	71	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.04	78	0.03
Chiu 1999		58	0.52	28	0.00	50	0.04	68	0.04	55	0.04	64	0.04
Cohen 1997		82	0.42	47	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	34	0.22	48	0.08
Cortot 1951		75	0.48	83	0.00	82	0.04	64	0.04	83	0.03	89	0.03
Csalog 1996		71	0.50	44	0.00	52	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.18	37	0.10
Czerny 1949		28	0.64	45	0.00	41	0.05	34	0.16	67	0.04	46	0.08
Czerny 1990		1	0.77	1	0.25	1	0.24	1	0.61	12	0.42	3	0.51
Duchoud 2007		84	0.39	62	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	84	0.03
Ezaki 2006		45	0.58	75	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	83	0.03	63	0.04
Falvay 1989		21	0.65	19	0.01	30	0.07	31	0.22	8	0.53	10	0.34
Farrell 1958		20	0.65	40	0.00	10	0.11	12	0.47	25	0.33	6	0.39
Ferenczy 1958		39	0.60	5	0.06	24	0.08	36	0.15	39	0.10	35	0.12
Fliere 1977		30	0.63	54	0.00	42	0.04	39	0.12	58	0.05	43	0.08
Fou 1978		16	0.67	13	0.02	8	0.14	11	0.48	32	0.18	14	0.29
Francois 1956		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1923		57	0.53	76	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.05	75	0.04
Friedman 1923b		60	0.52	63	0.00	74	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.05	72	0.04
Friedman 1930		49	0.56	77	0.00	69	0.03	83	0.03	45	0.08	60	0.05
Garcia 2007		34	0.62	72	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.28	51	0.06	33	0.13
Garcia 2007b		37	0.62	39	0.00	26	0.09	27	0.27	61	0.04	38	0.10
Gierzod 1998		12	0.69	58	0.00	17	0.10	13	0.46	51	0.06	22	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		18	0.66	46	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.24	41	0.09	24	0.15
Groot 1988		27	0.64	3	0.07	9	0.12	20	0.42	29	0.30	9	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955		53	0.56	34	0.00	63	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.05	73	0.04
Hatto 1993		72	0.49	89	0.00	70	0.02	84	0.02	77	0.04	88	0.03
Hatto 1997		64	0.51	68	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	78	0.04	83	0.03
Horowitz 1949		83	0.41	78	0.00	86	0.04	65	0.04	60	0.05	66	0.04
Indjic 1988		62	0.51	86	0.00	65	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.04	67	0.04
Kapell 1951		46	0.58	80	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.12	65	0.04	49	0.07
Kissin 1993		32	0.63	20	0.01	25	0.07	25	0.29	68	0.03	41	0.09
Kushner 1989		2	0.76	2	0.15	2	0.30	4	0.56	13	0.47	2	0.51
Luisada 1991		41	0.59	60	0.00	27	0.08	29	0.24	48	0.06	34	0.12
Lushtak 2004		22	0.65	36	0.00	23	0.10	21	0.37	51	0.05	27	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		79	0.46	26	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	70	0.03	79	0.03
Magaloff 1978		13	0.68	22	0.01	21	0.08	23	0.32	10	0.40	8	0.36
Magin 1975		52	0.56	4	0.06	7	0.11	22	0.34	38	0.15	19	0.23
Michalowski 1933		36	0.62	35	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.09	45	0.07	45	0.08
Milkina 1970		15	0.67	64	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.25	71	0.03	40	0.09
Mohovich 1999		14	0.67	42	0.00	19	0.09	16	0.43	64	0.05	23	0.15
Moravec 1969		51	0.56	65	0.00	51	0.04	66	0.04	23	0.40	29	0.13
Morozova 2008		65	0.51	25	0.00	37	0.05	37	0.14	57	0.04	51	0.07
Neighaus 1950		9	0.71	15	0.01	22	0.10	18	0.42	61	0.05	28	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		19	0.65	9	0.03	20	0.08	19	0.42	35	0.23	12	0.31
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.61	61	0.00	36	0.04	33	0.20	58	0.05	36	0.10
Osinska 1989		7	0.72	6	0.05	13	0.13	8	0.50	39	0.16	15	0.28
Pachmann 1927		31	0.63	50	0.00	45	0.04	58	0.04	11	0.42	31	0.13
Paderewski 1930		3	0.74	8	0.04	4	0.14	3	0.56	1	0.59	1	0.57
Perlemuter 1992		10	0.70	14	0.01	14	0.12	14	0.45	37	0.14	18	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		42	0.59	27	0.00	18	0.11	17	0.43	4	0.54	4	0.48
Poblocka 1999		54	0.55	21	0.01	49	0.05	49	0.05	47	0.07	53	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		5	0.72	16	0.01	3	0.12	6	0.53	8	0.41	5	0.47
Rachmaninoff 1923		33	0.62	32	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.16	52	0.05	39	0.09
Rangell 2001		80	0.46	49	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	31	0.22	42	0.09
Richter 1976		87	0.27	81	0.00	87	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Rosen 1989		11	0.69	43	0.00	6	0.14	7	0.51	22	0.29	7	0.38
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.47	31	0.00	81	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		74	0.48	73	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	47	0.06	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.51	84	0.00	67	0.03	78	0.03	41	0.10	62	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.47	74	0.00	80	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.04	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.50	69	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	39	0.13	52	0.07
Rossi 2007		47	0.58	17	0.01	53	0.05	50	0.05	20	0.34	30	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		66	0.51	79	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		63	0.51	59	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.13	31	0.34	20	0.21
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.56	33	0.00	62	0.05	51	0.05	70	0.04	68	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.52	29	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.04	82	0.03
Shebanova 2002		4	0.73	24	0.01	5	0.14	2	0.57	40	0.17	13	0.31
Smith 1975		35	0.62	56	0.00	35	0.05	40	0.12	51	0.05	44	0.08
Sokolov 2002		68	0.51	23	0.01	59	0.04	61	0.04	69	0.03	76	0.03
Sztompka 1959		6	0.72	18	0.01	11	0.11	5	0.55	42	0.13	17	0.27
Tomsic 1995		55	0.55	52	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	24	0.41	25	0.14
Uninsky 1932		56	0.54	66	0.00	60	0.05	47	0.05	68	0.05	61	0.05
Uninsky 1971		73	0.49	87	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	52	0.06	58	0.05
Wasowski 1980		44	0.59	12	0.02	47	0.05	46	0.05	55	0.06	56	0.05
Zak 1937		43	0.59	88	0.00	46	0.04	59	0.04	65	0.04	65	0.04
Zak 1951		48	0.57	67	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	61	0.04	54	0.06
Random 1		90	-0.24	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.13	70	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	25	0.21	55	0.06
Random 3		88	-0.06	57	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	23	0.32	47	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).