Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.80	27	0.01	11	0.08	7	0.54	30	0.29	16	0.40
Anderszewski 2003		3	0.83	2	0.15	2	0.14	4	0.56	2	0.50	4	0.53
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.77	33	0.00	10	0.10	21	0.37	20	0.31	21	0.34
Bacha 2000		46	0.69	43	0.00	36	0.07	29	0.23	10	0.40	24	0.30
Badura 1965		39	0.70	13	0.01	59	0.04	56	0.04	43	0.16	61	0.08
Barbosa 1983		47	0.68	41	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.18	7	0.46	26	0.29
Biret 1990		29	0.73	7	0.04	18	0.08	16	0.39	14	0.42	17	0.40
Blet 2003		59	0.64	14	0.01	64	0.03	79	0.03	44	0.09	68	0.05
Block 1995		54	0.65	51	0.00	55	0.05	45	0.05	17	0.28	44	0.12
Blumental 1952		24	0.73	6	0.04	23	0.08	23	0.34	10	0.29	23	0.31
Boshniakovich 1969		49	0.67	88	0.00	54	0.05	47	0.05	53	0.06	71	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.73	23	0.01	40	0.06	40	0.12	5	0.52	30	0.25
Bunin 1987		84	0.42	65	0.00	86	0.03	69	0.03	55	0.06	81	0.04
Bunin 1987b		86	0.40	48	0.00	85	0.04	63	0.04	57	0.05	76	0.04
Chiu 1999		9	0.80	34	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.41	2	0.46	12	0.43
Cohen 1997		81	0.47	75	0.00	87	0.04	64	0.04	59	0.04	80	0.04
Cortot 1951		41	0.70	68	0.00	46	0.04	52	0.04	22	0.40	43	0.13
Csalog 1996		87	0.39	66	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	37	0.15	62	0.07
Czerny 1949		32	0.72	71	0.00	19	0.09	22	0.35	29	0.39	19	0.37
Czerny 1990		4	0.82	9	0.04	8	0.15	2	0.58	6	0.51	3	0.54
Duchoud 2007		74	0.53	83	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	48	0.06	79	0.04
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		65	0.59	52	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	38	0.25	52	0.09
Farrell 1958		23	0.74	21	0.01	29	0.08	32	0.21	21	0.39	25	0.29
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.64	53	0.00	77	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.07	69	0.05
Fliere 1977		15	0.78	17	0.01	25	0.08	19	0.38	43	0.14	32	0.23
Fou 1978		26	0.73	35	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	38	0.12	58	0.08
Francois 1956		68	0.58	76	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	52	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1923		5	0.81	55	0.00	21	0.09	17	0.39	23	0.43	14	0.41
Friedman 1923b		7	0.80	22	0.01	20	0.09	15	0.39	23	0.43	13	0.41
Friedman 1930		11	0.80	69	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.30	23	0.43	20	0.36
Garcia 2007		48	0.67	72	0.00	62	0.03	77	0.03	48	0.07	70	0.05
Garcia 2007b		63	0.61	50	0.00	67	0.03	87	0.03	50	0.05	85	0.04
Gierzod 1998		30	0.73	32	0.00	24	0.08	18	0.38	43	0.13	36	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		58	0.64	56	0.00	52	0.04	49	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.04
Groot 1988		53	0.65	78	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	21	0.35	42	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		1	0.86	3	0.06	3	0.15	1	0.61	3	0.56	1	0.58
Hatto 1993		22	0.74	37	0.00	30	0.06	34	0.20	35	0.21	39	0.20
Hatto 1997		18	0.76	15	0.01	32	0.09	33	0.20	35	0.21	38	0.20
Horowitz 1949		43	0.69	57	0.00	53	0.04	50	0.04	37	0.31	46	0.11
Indjic 1988		19	0.76	36	0.00	31	0.07	35	0.20	35	0.20	37	0.20
Kapell 1951		60	0.63	38	0.00	12	0.08	20	0.38	31	0.14	33	0.23
Kissin 1993		21	0.75	29	0.01	15	0.09	11	0.49	24	0.33	15	0.40
Kushner 1989		45	0.69	60	0.00	58	0.04	55	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.04
Luisada 1991		2	0.84	4	0.05	4	0.14	10	0.51	7	0.42	10	0.46
Lushtak 2004		36	0.71	79	0.00	60	0.03	68	0.03	60	0.04	88	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		71	0.57	24	0.01	34	0.06	39	0.17	6	0.45	27	0.28
Magaloff 1978		56	0.64	62	0.00	68	0.04	65	0.04	39	0.17	56	0.08
Magin 1975		28	0.73	12	0.02	9	0.12	12	0.47	16	0.42	11	0.44
Michalowski 1933		73	0.56	84	0.00	78	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	78	0.04
Milkina 1970		14	0.78	1	0.23	1	0.23	3	0.58	5	0.57	2	0.57
Mohovich 1999		20	0.76	31	0.00	14	0.09	13	0.44	9	0.54	8	0.49
Moravec 1969		64	0.60	46	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	10	0.53	29	0.25
Morozova 2008		16	0.77	61	0.00	22	0.09	30	0.22	28	0.24	34	0.23
Neighaus 1950		50	0.67	85	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.05	83	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.69	49	0.00	17	0.07	24	0.32	20	0.44	18	0.38
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.64	30	0.00	50	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.05	77	0.04
Osinska 1989		12	0.79	11	0.03	13	0.08	9	0.52	15	0.45	9	0.48
Pachmann 1927		66	0.58	44	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	61	0.03	87	0.03
Paderewski 1930		69	0.57	80	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.03	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		37	0.70	89	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	62	0.04	74	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.49	67	0.00	61	0.03	74	0.03	35	0.24	57	0.08
Poblocka 1999		61	0.61	19	0.01	42	0.04	42	0.08	53	0.05	63	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		62	0.61	54	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	45	0.07	66	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		10	0.80	18	0.01	7	0.12	8	0.54	4	0.50	5	0.52
Rangell 2001		85	0.41	40	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	22	0.34	51	0.10
Richter 1976		72	0.56	58	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	45	0.12	64	0.06
Rosen 1989		35	0.71	26	0.01	27	0.06	27	0.25	28	0.23	31	0.24
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.50	63	0.00	73	0.04	58	0.04	28	0.18	60	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.49	73	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	16	0.42	47	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.49	86	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	16	0.42	49	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		83	0.44	74	0.00	72	0.03	70	0.03	25	0.26	55	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.49	64	0.00	71	0.03	71	0.03	18	0.37	48	0.11
Rossi 2007		34	0.72	25	0.01	48	0.04	51	0.04	6	0.55	40	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.66	45	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	30	0.20	53	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.45	59	0.00	66	0.03	84	0.03	47	0.10	73	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.70	39	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.08	39	0.22	41	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.66	70	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	46	0.08	65	0.06
Shebanova 2002		42	0.69	28	0.01	37	0.05	28	0.25	80	0.03	54	0.09
Smith 1975		27	0.73	16	0.01	28	0.08	26	0.29	12	0.38	22	0.33
Sokolov 2002		67	0.58	10	0.03	35	0.07	36	0.19	15	0.35	28	0.26
Sztompka 1959		31	0.72	87	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.22	55	0.05	50	0.10
Tomsic 1995		75	0.51	47	0.00	83	0.04	66	0.04	41	0.16	59	0.08
Uninsky 1932		40	0.70	20	0.01	38	0.05	37	0.18	30	0.29	35	0.23
Uninsky 1971		70	0.57	42	0.00	63	0.03	72	0.03	49	0.07	67	0.05
Wasowski 1980		33	0.72	77	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.08	31	0.16	45	0.11
Zak 1937		8	0.80	5	0.04	6	0.24	6	0.56	8	0.46	7	0.51
Zak 1951		13	0.79	8	0.04	5	0.16	5	0.56	8	0.48	6	0.52
Random 1		90	-0.23	90	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	41	0.11	89	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.11	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	76	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.15	82	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	32	0.23	72	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).