Czerny 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		1	0.83	6	0.07	5	0.19	3	0.54	22	0.39	10	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.77	9	0.01	14	0.07	26	0.26	21	0.26	28	0.26
Ashkenazy 1981		60	0.64	74	0.00	57	0.03	70	0.03	53	0.04	86	0.03
Bacha 2000		54	0.67	82	0.00	18	0.06	28	0.23	8	0.42	19	0.31
Badura 1965		69	0.60	71	0.00	78	0.03	69	0.03	59	0.05	78	0.04
Barbosa 1983		76	0.55	33	0.00	68	0.04	62	0.04	33	0.15	63	0.08
Biret 1990		43	0.70	75	0.00	21	0.08	27	0.24	16	0.40	20	0.31
Blet 2003		36	0.71	16	0.01	32	0.05	39	0.12	18	0.36	34	0.21
Block 1995		77	0.53	50	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	51	0.05	79	0.04
Blumental 1952		11	0.77	1	0.15	1	0.15	2	0.55	1	0.60	2	0.57
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.66	21	0.01	42	0.05	44	0.09	68	0.05	68	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.68	58	0.00	66	0.03	64	0.03	23	0.30	57	0.09
Bunin 1987		86	0.36	79	0.00	87	0.04	52	0.04	71	0.04	80	0.04
Bunin 1987b		87	0.34	66	0.00	86	0.03	68	0.03	72	0.04	83	0.03
Chiu 1999		51	0.68	59	0.00	36	0.05	41	0.10	24	0.24	41	0.15
Cohen 1997		83	0.46	47	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	22	0.30	59	0.09
Cortot 1951		58	0.65	83	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	57	0.04	87	0.03
Csalog 1996		79	0.52	88	0.00	67	0.03	71	0.03	16	0.36	55	0.10
Czerny 1949		8	0.79	5	0.12	7	0.13	5	0.51	7	0.55	5	0.53
Czerny 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Duchoud 2007		82	0.47	61	0.00	83	0.04	48	0.04	61	0.04	77	0.04
Ezaki 2006		3	0.82	14	0.01	8	0.12	6	0.51	2	0.58	3	0.54
Falvay 1989		59	0.64	20	0.01	71	0.04	49	0.04	19	0.47	42	0.14
Farrell 1958		27	0.73	19	0.01	16	0.08	16	0.36	4	0.55	13	0.44
Ferenczy 1958		62	0.64	31	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.04	85	0.03
Fliere 1977		7	0.79	34	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.28	41	0.15	36	0.20
Fou 1978		48	0.69	39	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	34	0.15	61	0.08
Francois 1956		10	0.77	49	0.00	10	0.10	12	0.42	1	0.61	6	0.51
Friedman 1923		22	0.74	25	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.14	22	0.44	30	0.25
Friedman 1923b		24	0.74	48	0.00	38	0.05	33	0.16	22	0.44	27	0.27
Friedman 1930		16	0.76	76	0.00	37	0.04	32	0.16	14	0.49	26	0.28
Garcia 2007		45	0.69	85	0.00	61	0.04	53	0.04	37	0.18	64	0.08
Garcia 2007b		63	0.63	89	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.05	81	0.04
Gierzod 1998		5	0.80	4	0.13	4	0.21	1	0.56	9	0.53	4	0.54
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.66	36	0.00	47	0.04	51	0.04	25	0.21	60	0.09
Groot 1988		72	0.58	32	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	46	0.07	73	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.72	22	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.10	70	0.04	71	0.06
Hatto 1993		33	0.72	18	0.01	44	0.07	37	0.13	30	0.25	40	0.18
Hatto 1997		26	0.73	84	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	30	0.24	46	0.13
Horowitz 1949		80	0.52	90	0.00	84	0.05	46	0.05	56	0.06	72	0.05
Indjic 1988		25	0.74	37	0.00	43	0.06	35	0.14	31	0.25	37	0.19
Kapell 1951		46	0.69	23	0.00	22	0.08	24	0.27	27	0.17	33	0.21
Kissin 1993		9	0.79	44	0.00	9	0.12	8	0.46	16	0.43	14	0.44
Kushner 1989		6	0.80	60	0.00	23	0.13	18	0.34	12	0.48	15	0.40
Luisada 1991		18	0.75	77	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.35	28	0.24	23	0.29
Lushtak 2004		34	0.72	27	0.00	48	0.04	57	0.04	31	0.18	65	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		73	0.57	8	0.03	51	0.03	66	0.03	32	0.19	62	0.08
Magaloff 1978		44	0.70	45	0.00	33	0.05	40	0.12	3	0.51	29	0.25
Magin 1975		40	0.70	46	0.00	26	0.08	20	0.31	21	0.39	17	0.35
Michalowski 1933		64	0.61	67	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	50	0.06	75	0.04
Milkina 1970		12	0.77	15	0.01	15	0.07	10	0.45	12	0.48	9	0.46
Mohovich 1999		32	0.72	62	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.27	22	0.43	18	0.34
Moravec 1969		37	0.71	40	0.00	11	0.12	19	0.31	2	0.66	11	0.45
Morozova 2008		35	0.71	68	0.00	34	0.05	34	0.15	25	0.29	35	0.21
Neighaus 1950		49	0.68	65	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.12	41	0.10	52	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		2	0.82	3	0.14	3	0.21	4	0.54	1	0.68	1	0.61
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.67	13	0.01	46	0.04	56	0.04	43	0.11	67	0.07
Osinska 1989		4	0.81	7	0.04	6	0.14	7	0.50	13	0.48	7	0.49
Pachmann 1927		56	0.66	72	0.00	77	0.04	55	0.04	16	0.36	47	0.12
Paderewski 1930		38	0.71	69	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.18	6	0.46	25	0.29
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.72	55	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.16	31	0.21	39	0.18
Pierdomenico 2008		81	0.51	54	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	17	0.39	50	0.11
Poblocka 1999		61	0.64	63	0.00	58	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.04	82	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		19	0.75	2	0.14	2	0.19	9	0.45	4	0.48	8	0.46
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.76	17	0.01	17	0.07	14	0.38	10	0.38	16	0.38
Rangell 2001		85	0.40	52	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	37	0.15	69	0.07
Richter 1976		84	0.40	64	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	65	0.04	84	0.03
Rosen 1989		21	0.75	38	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.43	10	0.47	12	0.45
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.59	80	0.00	70	0.04	50	0.04	18	0.29	51	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		70	0.60	73	0.00	64	0.03	86	0.03	11	0.49	48	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.61	56	0.00	63	0.03	72	0.03	11	0.50	49	0.12
Rosenthal 1931c		66	0.61	35	0.00	50	0.04	47	0.04	11	0.47	44	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		65	0.61	70	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	10	0.52	43	0.14
Rossi 2007		47	0.69	30	0.00	59	0.03	81	0.03	7	0.53	45	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.70	53	0.00	60	0.03	83	0.03	18	0.34	53	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		75	0.56	26	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.10	25	0.38	38	0.19
Rubinstein 1966		31	0.72	12	0.01	55	0.03	65	0.03	24	0.36	56	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		41	0.70	51	0.00	52	0.03	84	0.03	55	0.05	76	0.04
Shebanova 2002		14	0.76	29	0.00	20	0.07	15	0.37	34	0.24	22	0.30
Smith 1975		29	0.72	42	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.22	14	0.37	24	0.29
Sokolov 2002		78	0.53	78	0.00	72	0.03	85	0.03	48	0.05	74	0.04
Sztompka 1959		20	0.75	11	0.01	13	0.08	13	0.38	32	0.24	21	0.30
Tomsic 1995		74	0.56	41	0.00	80	0.03	67	0.03	32	0.31	54	0.10
Uninsky 1932		52	0.67	57	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	40	0.20	58	0.09
Uninsky 1971		68	0.60	28	0.00	53	0.03	75	0.03	44	0.12	70	0.06
Wasowski 1980		39	0.71	43	0.00	56	0.04	54	0.04	40	0.11	66	0.07
Zak 1937		17	0.76	10	0.01	28	0.09	21	0.29	32	0.18	31	0.23
Zak 1951		23	0.74	24	0.00	27	0.07	22	0.28	31	0.19	32	0.23
Random 1		90	-0.22	86	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	72	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.15	81	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	54	0.04	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.19	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).