Cortot 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.69	49	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.28	54	0.05	35	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		35	0.62	51	0.00	53	0.05	46	0.05	65	0.04	68	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.62	18	0.01	17	0.09	15	0.45	38	0.15	17	0.26
Bacha 2000		63	0.55	47	0.00	60	0.04	73	0.04	70	0.04	53	0.04
Badura 1965		65	0.55	32	0.00	69	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.05	75	0.04
Barbosa 1983		77	0.47	69	0.00	74	0.05	51	0.05	60	0.04	65	0.04
Biret 1990		24	0.66	41	0.00	12	0.10	18	0.41	35	0.18	15	0.27
Blet 2003		28	0.65	76	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.05	69	0.04
Block 1995		60	0.56	43	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.09	52	0.05	47	0.07
Blumental 1952		46	0.60	46	0.00	48	0.04	55	0.04	47	0.06	51	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		22	0.67	27	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.30	45	0.07	27	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.59	61	0.00	59	0.03	77	0.03	49	0.05	55	0.04
Bunin 1987		70	0.52	67	0.00	67	0.05	52	0.05	24	0.33	32	0.13
Bunin 1987b		72	0.50	84	0.00	66	0.03	79	0.03	24	0.32	41	0.10
Chiu 1999		62	0.55	31	0.00	55	0.04	69	0.04	47	0.04	56	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.29	65	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.03	90	0.02
Cortot 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Csalog 1996		79	0.46	23	0.01	71	0.04	72	0.04	48	0.05	67	0.04
Czerny 1949		11	0.71	25	0.01	22	0.10	17	0.42	40	0.24	13	0.32
Czerny 1990		29	0.65	83	0.00	47	0.04	57	0.04	82	0.03	88	0.03
Duchoud 2007		56	0.58	30	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.12	10	0.38	19	0.21
Ezaki 2006		13	0.70	15	0.01	21	0.09	22	0.40	52	0.04	28	0.13
Falvay 1989		86	0.36	87	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	52	0.07	57	0.04
Farrell 1958		41	0.61	9	0.02	34	0.08	32	0.22	59	0.05	40	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		39	0.62	40	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	49	0.05	73	0.04
Fliere 1977		4	0.74	70	0.00	13	0.10	10	0.47	53	0.05	25	0.15
Fou 1978		45	0.60	42	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	56	0.04	62	0.04
Francois 1956		75	0.48	79	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	64	0.04	89	0.03
Friedman 1923		32	0.64	74	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	55	0.05	49	0.06
Friedman 1923b		33	0.64	88	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.14	49	0.06	43	0.09
Friedman 1930		31	0.64	34	0.00	46	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.05	72	0.04
Garcia 2007		1	0.75	12	0.01	7	0.13	7	0.51	16	0.45	4	0.48
Garcia 2007b		19	0.69	26	0.01	16	0.10	11	0.46	27	0.32	10	0.38
Gierzod 1998		34	0.63	86	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	65	0.04	74	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.58	6	0.02	73	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.03	87	0.03
Groot 1988		44	0.61	54	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.15	40	0.19	21	0.17
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.73	3	0.08	2	0.29	2	0.61	24	0.32	6	0.44
Hatto 1993		51	0.59	44	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.22	46	0.06	39	0.11
Hatto 1997		40	0.61	19	0.01	31	0.10	29	0.24	61	0.05	38	0.11
Horowitz 1949		7	0.72	21	0.01	8	0.13	4	0.55	9	0.52	1	0.53
Indjic 1988		43	0.61	62	0.00	32	0.08	30	0.22	46	0.07	34	0.12
Kapell 1951		2	0.74	1	0.34	1	0.33	1	0.63	10	0.34	5	0.46
Kissin 1993		23	0.66	37	0.00	30	0.08	27	0.29	48	0.04	37	0.11
Kushner 1989		55	0.58	35	0.00	68	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.05	63	0.04
Luisada 1991		54	0.59	55	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	66	0.04	54	0.04
Lushtak 2004		48	0.60	20	0.01	27	0.08	34	0.17	36	0.15	24	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.65	2	0.24	3	0.24	13	0.45	4	0.51	3	0.48
Magaloff 1978		73	0.50	56	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03	80	0.03
Magin 1975		47	0.60	58	0.00	54	0.05	47	0.05	75	0.03	60	0.04
Michalowski 1933		53	0.59	71	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	56	0.05	64	0.04
Milkina 1970		30	0.64	59	0.00	45	0.04	53	0.04	77	0.03	82	0.03
Mohovich 1999		38	0.62	89	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.11	56	0.06	45	0.08
Moravec 1969		58	0.58	33	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.09	29	0.28	22	0.16
Morozova 2008		42	0.61	39	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	54	0.04	71	0.04
Neighaus 1950		14	0.69	13	0.01	14	0.09	14	0.45	36	0.16	16	0.27
Niedzielski 1931		8	0.72	16	0.01	10	0.13	9	0.48	30	0.31	7	0.39
Ohlsson 1999		59	0.58	90	0.00	36	0.05	35	0.16	61	0.04	44	0.08
Osinska 1989		12	0.71	63	0.00	24	0.11	20	0.41	48	0.06	23	0.16
Pachmann 1927		74	0.48	50	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	60	0.04	84	0.03
Paderewski 1930		49	0.59	17	0.01	63	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.03	83	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.69	38	0.00	19	0.07	23	0.39	38	0.14	18	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008		85	0.37	11	0.01	83	0.04	63	0.04	74	0.04	58	0.04
Poblocka 1999		25	0.66	5	0.03	11	0.11	19	0.41	33	0.23	14	0.31
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.55	52	0.00	75	0.06	45	0.06	81	0.03	61	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		21	0.68	29	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.35	58	0.04	33	0.12
Rangell 2001		82	0.44	24	0.01	70	0.04	68	0.04	39	0.15	46	0.08
Richter 1976		36	0.62	7	0.02	25	0.10	31	0.22	12	0.53	12	0.34
Rosen 1989		64	0.55	77	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	87	0.02	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		66	0.55	48	0.00	65	0.04	66	0.04	37	0.10	48	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.48	80	0.00	77	0.04	67	0.04	72	0.04	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.47	81	0.00	79	0.04	64	0.04	50	0.06	52	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		81	0.46	82	0.00	81	0.04	56	0.04	66	0.04	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.46	85	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	59	0.05	77	0.04
Rossi 2007		71	0.51	14	0.01	42	0.04	40	0.11	43	0.11	36	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		68	0.54	57	0.00	58	0.04	75	0.04	70	0.04	59	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.40	75	0.00	76	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.04	79	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.55	68	0.00	57	0.03	80	0.03	45	0.06	70	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		5	0.73	8	0.02	5	0.13	3	0.56	19	0.47	2	0.51
Shebanova 2002		15	0.69	53	0.00	23	0.09	16	0.43	57	0.04	31	0.13
Smith 1975		50	0.59	72	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	83	0.03	81	0.03
Sokolov 2002		69	0.53	60	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.14	42	0.12	29	0.13
Sztompka 1959		10	0.71	4	0.03	6	0.14	6	0.51	49	0.07	20	0.19
Tomsic 1995		83	0.42	36	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	51	0.07	50	0.05
Uninsky 1932		3	0.74	10	0.01	9	0.18	5	0.53	31	0.28	8	0.39
Uninsky 1971		17	0.69	28	0.00	15	0.08	12	0.46	36	0.32	9	0.38
Wasowski 1980		9	0.71	22	0.01	4	0.14	8	0.51	20	0.24	11	0.35
Zak 1937		20	0.68	66	0.00	18	0.09	21	0.40	57	0.04	30	0.13
Zak 1951		26	0.66	78	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.38	54	0.05	26	0.14
Random 1		88	-0.07	73	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	6	0.53	42	0.10
Random 2		90	-0.16	64	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	44	0.07	85	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.11	45	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	39	0.15	76	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).