Boshniakovich 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		5	0.79	6	0.03	11	0.14	9	0.55	16	0.40	19	0.47
Anderszewski 2003		16	0.76	29	0.00	24	0.09	28	0.34	18	0.29	30	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.65	16	0.01	33	0.10	30	0.31	36	0.18	36	0.24
Bacha 2000		75	0.44	59	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.04	78	0.03
Badura 1965		11	0.77	37	0.00	7	0.11	10	0.54	2	0.62	1	0.58
Barbosa 1983		84	0.34	31	0.00	77	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.04	73	0.04
Biret 1990		63	0.57	14	0.01	54	0.06	52	0.06	60	0.04	66	0.05
Blet 2003		41	0.67	64	0.00	45	0.05	64	0.05	35	0.17	50	0.09
Block 1995		39	0.67	77	0.00	23	0.08	33	0.25	11	0.35	32	0.30
Blumental 1952		74	0.46	49	0.00	66	0.04	71	0.04	43	0.08	60	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.53	79	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03
Bunin 1987		55	0.61	60	0.00	38	0.07	41	0.18	8	0.50	33	0.30
Bunin 1987b		56	0.60	61	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.19	8	0.50	29	0.31
Chiu 1999		72	0.47	70	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	48	0.04	69	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.21	65	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	70	0.03	89	0.02
Cortot 1951		38	0.67	44	0.00	49	0.07	45	0.07	26	0.30	43	0.14
Csalog 1996		82	0.36	62	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	85	0.02	83	0.03
Czerny 1949		15	0.76	42	0.00	9	0.10	19	0.47	24	0.44	20	0.45
Czerny 1990		50	0.66	66	0.00	60	0.05	68	0.05	44	0.09	56	0.07
Duchoud 2007		59	0.59	26	0.01	50	0.05	54	0.05	13	0.35	44	0.13
Ezaki 2006		40	0.67	84	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	47	0.05	61	0.05
Falvay 1989		83	0.36	74	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	66	0.05	80	0.03
Farrell 1958		69	0.52	57	0.00	68	0.07	47	0.07	65	0.04	63	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.64	67	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	46	0.07	59	0.06
Fliere 1977		1	0.82	9	0.03	5	0.11	6	0.57	13	0.41	12	0.48
Fou 1978		47	0.66	80	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.14	33	0.18	38	0.16
Francois 1956		57	0.60	54	0.00	64	0.05	60	0.05	63	0.04	77	0.04
Friedman 1923		34	0.68	69	0.00	32	0.08	25	0.37	19	0.46	25	0.41
Friedman 1923b		36	0.68	75	0.00	30	0.08	24	0.38	20	0.46	22	0.42
Friedman 1930		24	0.72	19	0.01	29	0.07	26	0.36	17	0.47	23	0.41
Garcia 2007		35	0.68	51	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	43	0.13	53	0.08
Garcia 2007b		48	0.66	87	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.18	39	0.15	40	0.16
Gierzod 1998		3	0.81	5	0.04	4	0.13	4	0.58	11	0.48	5	0.53
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.72	8	0.03	31	0.07	35	0.22	14	0.33	34	0.27
Groot 1988		62	0.57	36	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	50	0.06	67	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.80	1	0.25	1	0.24	1	0.62	4	0.53	2	0.57
Hatto 1993		37	0.67	30	0.00	19	0.16	12	0.54	10	0.50	8	0.52
Hatto 1997		30	0.69	32	0.00	18	0.10	13	0.54	8	0.50	7	0.52
Horowitz 1949		14	0.76	58	0.00	21	0.10	21	0.45	7	0.52	15	0.48
Indjic 1988		29	0.70	11	0.03	13	0.10	11	0.54	9	0.50	6	0.52
Kapell 1951		49	0.66	53	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.23	42	0.08	42	0.14
Kissin 1993		6	0.79	12	0.02	12	0.18	15	0.52	15	0.44	17	0.48
Kushner 1989		31	0.69	33	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	46	0.07	57	0.06
Luisada 1991		43	0.67	39	0.00	41	0.07	42	0.17	60	0.05	48	0.09
Lushtak 2004		58	0.59	38	0.00	56	0.05	66	0.05	40	0.12	54	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.70	7	0.03	28	0.07	32	0.25	5	0.46	28	0.34
Magaloff 1978		70	0.51	40	0.00	70	0.05	57	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.05
Magin 1975		18	0.75	28	0.00	26	0.10	29	0.34	34	0.20	35	0.26
Michalowski 1933		9	0.78	23	0.01	15	0.07	20	0.46	6	0.54	10	0.50
Milkina 1970		42	0.67	34	0.00	51	0.05	67	0.05	49	0.05	64	0.05
Mohovich 1999		61	0.59	56	0.00	62	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.05	65	0.05
Moravec 1969		85	0.31	71	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.02	87	0.02
Morozova 2008		33	0.69	63	0.00	34	0.08	31	0.28	35	0.19	37	0.23
Neighaus 1950		2	0.81	3	0.10	2	0.18	3	0.58	9	0.52	3	0.55
Niedzielski 1931		54	0.63	27	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	73	0.03	72	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.71	43	0.00	22	0.10	23	0.42	19	0.38	26	0.40
Osinska 1989		23	0.72	50	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.20	65	0.04	49	0.09
Pachmann 1927		21	0.73	13	0.02	46	0.05	65	0.05	3	0.51	39	0.16
Paderewski 1930		27	0.70	20	0.01	35	0.08	37	0.21	9	0.44	31	0.30
Perlemuter 1992		46	0.66	41	0.00	43	0.07	44	0.13	44	0.10	46	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		65	0.54	48	0.00	65	0.05	69	0.05	42	0.13	52	0.08
Poblocka 1999		8	0.78	35	0.00	8	0.10	8	0.55	14	0.47	9	0.51
Rabcewiczowa 1932		71	0.50	83	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		60	0.59	81	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.04
Rangell 2001		68	0.53	25	0.01	58	0.04	72	0.04	11	0.40	45	0.13
Richter 1976		7	0.78	4	0.07	6	0.12	18	0.47	4	0.62	4	0.54
Rosen 1989		44	0.67	85	0.00	52	0.07	48	0.07	40	0.11	51	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		64	0.54	76	0.00	69	0.07	46	0.07	32	0.13	47	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.38	88	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.38	72	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.40	86	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.38	89	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.03	90	0.02
Rossi 2007		77	0.41	17	0.01	79	0.03	82	0.03	59	0.05	68	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		76	0.44	68	0.00	76	0.05	56	0.05	78	0.04	71	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		86	0.25	55	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		73	0.46	46	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	77	0.04	74	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		17	0.75	18	0.01	20	0.09	17	0.49	14	0.48	18	0.48
Shebanova 2002		13	0.76	15	0.01	14	0.09	16	0.51	24	0.35	21	0.42
Smith 1975		45	0.66	21	0.01	55	0.06	50	0.06	40	0.09	55	0.07
Sokolov 2002		52	0.64	22	0.01	25	0.08	27	0.35	8	0.41	27	0.38
Sztompka 1959		10	0.77	52	0.00	10	0.10	2	0.58	17	0.40	16	0.48
Tomsic 1995		66	0.53	45	0.00	71	0.05	62	0.05	50	0.07	58	0.06
Uninsky 1932		22	0.73	78	0.00	27	0.11	22	0.44	22	0.38	24	0.41
Uninsky 1971		12	0.77	2	0.11	3	0.13	14	0.53	8	0.47	11	0.50
Wasowski 1980		32	0.69	47	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.21	41	0.10	41	0.14
Zak 1937		19	0.74	10	0.03	17	0.10	5	0.57	11	0.40	13	0.48
Zak 1951		20	0.73	24	0.01	16	0.08	7	0.57	10	0.40	14	0.48
Random 1		90	-0.23	82	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	31	0.18	75	0.04
Random 2		89	-0.17	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	62	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.11	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	36	0.18	76	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).