Zak 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.65	51	0.00	22	0.09	16	0.46	21	0.45	18	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		42	0.58	52	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	36	0.29	57	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.65	53	0.00	23	0.10	29	0.32	11	0.46	30	0.38
Bacha 2000		73	0.46	54	0.00	74	0.05	70	0.05	56	0.04	79	0.04
Badura 1965		47	0.56	55	0.00	25	0.07	36	0.15	18	0.46	38	0.26
Barbosa 1983		50	0.55	56	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.14	18	0.49	37	0.26
Biret 1990		10	0.67	15	0.00	5	0.12	3	0.67	4	0.63	3	0.65
Blet 2003		64	0.51	57	0.00	68	0.05	69	0.05	31	0.20	68	0.10
Block 1995		59	0.52	58	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	18	0.39	58	0.14
Blumental 1952		35	0.60	21	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	40	0.13	70	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		18	0.65	59	0.00	7	0.12	8	0.58	4	0.62	7	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.45	8	0.00	79	0.05	65	0.05	68	0.05	76	0.05
Bunin 1987		63	0.51	60	0.00	67	0.06	53	0.06	10	0.49	47	0.17
Bunin 1987b		67	0.50	33	0.00	66	0.03	84	0.03	9	0.48	65	0.12
Chiu 1999		43	0.58	61	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	2	0.52	42	0.19
Cohen 1997		83	0.39	62	0.00	81	0.04	81	0.04	38	0.12	73	0.07
Cortot 1951		79	0.42	63	0.00	80	0.04	78	0.04	58	0.05	83	0.04
Csalog 1996		54	0.54	2	0.00	53	0.05	62	0.05	14	0.43	51	0.15
Czerny 1949		31	0.61	3	0.00	32	0.08	23	0.41	27	0.46	19	0.43
Czerny 1990		11	0.67	34	0.00	18	0.10	15	0.47	19	0.47	16	0.47
Duchoud 2007		72	0.48	35	0.00	73	0.05	59	0.05	17	0.32	63	0.13
Ezaki 2006		2	0.71	36	0.00	6	0.13	6	0.61	5	0.66	4	0.63
Falvay 1989		45	0.58	16	0.00	28	0.06	43	0.11	28	0.37	41	0.20
Farrell 1958		49	0.56	64	0.00	50	0.07	51	0.07	35	0.30	55	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.52	37	0.00	69	0.05	67	0.05	36	0.26	67	0.11
Fliere 1977		7	0.68	17	0.00	13	0.13	11	0.52	28	0.31	25	0.40
Fou 1978		25	0.63	38	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.13	32	0.24	43	0.18
Francois 1956		66	0.50	65	0.00	63	0.04	80	0.04	28	0.40	64	0.13
Friedman 1923		38	0.60	4	0.00	39	0.05	37	0.15	11	0.52	34	0.28
Friedman 1923b		33	0.61	12	0.00	33	0.08	32	0.29	12	0.55	27	0.40
Friedman 1930		28	0.62	39	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.41	4	0.65	12	0.52
Garcia 2007		71	0.48	40	0.00	75	0.04	83	0.04	57	0.05	81	0.04
Garcia 2007b		62	0.51	41	0.00	64	0.04	74	0.04	58	0.04	85	0.04
Gierzod 1998		3	0.71	22	0.00	3	0.16	5	0.63	20	0.52	9	0.57
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.54	10	0.00	36	0.06	35	0.19	20	0.37	36	0.27
Groot 1988		56	0.53	23	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.13	15	0.38	40	0.22
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.69	66	0.00	2	0.25	2	0.67	9	0.66	2	0.66
Hatto 1993		14	0.66	42	0.00	21	0.17	20	0.45	21	0.37	24	0.41
Hatto 1997		12	0.67	18	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.45	20	0.38	23	0.41
Horowitz 1949		69	0.48	67	0.00	72	0.05	60	0.05	37	0.27	66	0.12
Indjic 1988		13	0.66	68	0.00	20	0.10	19	0.45	21	0.38	22	0.41
Kapell 1951		24	0.63	69	0.00	17	0.09	21	0.43	16	0.40	21	0.41
Kissin 1993		4	0.70	24	0.00	11	0.14	7	0.59	12	0.61	6	0.60
Kushner 1989		8	0.68	25	0.00	14	0.09	9	0.56	15	0.58	8	0.57
Luisada 1991		20	0.64	70	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.26	20	0.35	33	0.30
Lushtak 2004		23	0.63	43	0.00	15	0.10	24	0.41	8	0.57	15	0.48
Malcuzynski 1961		70	0.48	19	0.00	37	0.05	41	0.13	32	0.17	50	0.15
Magaloff 1978		57	0.52	71	0.00	65	0.04	82	0.04	50	0.06	78	0.05
Magin 1975		15	0.66	44	0.00	16	0.10	10	0.56	16	0.49	11	0.52
Michalowski 1933		78	0.44	72	0.00	71	0.05	68	0.05	24	0.34	62	0.13
Milkina 1970		21	0.63	13	0.00	10	0.13	17	0.46	26	0.45	17	0.45
Mohovich 1999		40	0.59	73	0.00	48	0.07	50	0.07	28	0.41	46	0.17
Moravec 1969		81	0.41	26	0.00	83	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.03	86	0.03
Morozova 2008		34	0.61	9	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	27	0.34	45	0.18
Neighaus 1950		52	0.54	74	0.00	51	0.06	57	0.06	25	0.31	60	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.52	75	0.00	60	0.07	49	0.07	30	0.27	54	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.63	76	0.00	8	0.15	13	0.51	12	0.52	13	0.51
Osinska 1989		6	0.68	6	0.00	4	0.11	4	0.67	15	0.57	5	0.62
Pachmann 1927		75	0.45	27	0.00	78	0.05	66	0.05	6	0.50	48	0.16
Paderewski 1930		82	0.41	28	0.00	77	0.04	77	0.04	36	0.17	71	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.56	77	0.00	55	0.05	64	0.05	14	0.46	49	0.15
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.50	78	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	12	0.48	53	0.14
Poblocka 1999		27	0.63	79	0.00	30	0.06	26	0.35	28	0.41	29	0.38
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.52	29	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	55	0.05	75	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		44	0.58	30	0.00	38	0.05	34	0.21	20	0.36	35	0.27
Rangell 2001		74	0.46	45	0.00	70	0.05	71	0.05	21	0.39	59	0.14
Richter 1976		51	0.54	5	0.00	61	0.08	45	0.08	29	0.42	44	0.18
Rosen 1989		26	0.63	46	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.32	15	0.40	32	0.36
Rosenthal 1930		80	0.42	14	0.00	82	0.04	76	0.04	60	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.36	20	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	49	0.06	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.37	31	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	51	0.05	84	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.37	7	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	57	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.36	80	0.00	87	0.04	79	0.04	55	0.05	82	0.04
Rossi 2007		77	0.45	81	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	47	0.07	77	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.62	47	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.12	11	0.42	39	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.61	82	0.00	26	0.07	31	0.30	20	0.45	31	0.37
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.68	83	0.00	9	0.12	14	0.50	8	0.62	10	0.56
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.62	11	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.33	22	0.45	28	0.39
Shebanova 2002		17	0.65	84	0.00	12	0.12	12	0.52	20	0.44	14	0.48
Smith 1975		41	0.59	32	0.00	52	0.06	54	0.06	25	0.30	61	0.13
Sokolov 2002		36	0.60	85	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.30	7	0.53	26	0.40
Sztompka 1959		39	0.60	86	0.00	45	0.06	58	0.06	44	0.15	69	0.09
Tomsic 1995		65	0.50	48	0.00	54	0.05	61	0.05	26	0.40	56	0.14
Uninsky 1932		55	0.53	49	0.00	56	0.06	55	0.06	30	0.37	52	0.15
Uninsky 1971		37	0.60	50	0.00	31	0.07	25	0.36	22	0.48	20	0.42
Wasowski 1980		46	0.57	87	0.00	57	0.06	56	0.06	47	0.07	74	0.06
Zak 1937		1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Zak 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		90	-0.08	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	55	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.02	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	54	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.05	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	17	0.30	72	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).