Rosenthal 1931c

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.46	55	0.00	30	0.08	27	0.37	77	0.03	32	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		35	0.44	13	0.00	34	0.09	32	0.26	66	0.04	34	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.37	11	0.00	50	0.05	56	0.05	78	0.03	62	0.04
Bacha 2000		44	0.40	6	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.21	63	0.04	37	0.09
Badura 1965		85	0.26	56	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Barbosa 1983		87	0.22	34	0.00	63	0.03	70	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Biret 1990		28	0.46	23	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.37	70	0.04	28	0.12
Blet 2003		42	0.41	18	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	82	0.02	73	0.03
Block 1995		84	0.26	35	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.03
Blumental 1952		13	0.53	12	0.00	8	0.22	7	0.64	38	0.16	12	0.32
Boshniakovich 1969		45	0.40	36	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04	61	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		26	0.46	49	0.00	26	0.10	22	0.41	36	0.26	10	0.33
Bunin 1987		77	0.30	14	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.04	79	0.03
Bunin 1987b		80	0.30	64	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	73	0.04	49	0.04
Chiu 1999		82	0.27	57	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	80	0.03	48	0.04
Cohen 1997		81	0.27	50	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.13	39	0.12	27	0.12
Cortot 1951		65	0.34	83	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		18	0.50	65	0.00	25	0.10	25	0.40	35	0.17	14	0.26
Czerny 1949		39	0.42	73	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.15	78	0.03	42	0.07
Czerny 1990		10	0.53	46	0.00	9	0.22	9	0.59	47	0.07	18	0.20
Duchoud 2007		79	0.30	37	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	73	0.04	59	0.04
Ezaki 2006		33	0.45	29	0.00	28	0.10	23	0.40	73	0.04	24	0.13
Falvay 1989		22	0.49	74	0.00	15	0.17	19	0.46	32	0.30	9	0.37
Farrell 1958		57	0.35	41	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	76	0.04	46	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.36	19	0.00	65	0.03	72	0.03	75	0.03	74	0.03
Fliere 1977		9	0.54	42	0.00	12	0.13	8	0.59	54	0.05	19	0.17
Fou 1978		40	0.42	51	0.00	31	0.07	33	0.26	70	0.04	33	0.10
Francois 1956		58	0.35	84	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	87	0.03	83	0.03
Friedman 1923		73	0.31	30	0.00	69	0.04	61	0.04	79	0.03	85	0.03
Friedman 1923b		72	0.32	17	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.04
Friedman 1930		55	0.36	47	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.04
Garcia 2007		71	0.33	85	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		61	0.35	58	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	73	0.04	84	0.03
Gierzod 1998		15	0.53	31	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.51	74	0.03	26	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		12	0.53	20	0.00	11	0.15	11	0.59	44	0.09	15	0.23
Groot 1988		60	0.35	38	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	74	0.04	45	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		59	0.35	48	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	86	0.03	65	0.04
Hatto 1993		69	0.34	75	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	84	0.03	64	0.04
Hatto 1997		63	0.35	76	0.00	57	0.06	49	0.06	84	0.03	58	0.04
Horowitz 1949		75	0.31	66	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.03	87	0.02
Indjic 1988		62	0.35	25	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	80	0.03	54	0.04
Kapell 1951		14	0.53	59	0.00	23	0.08	24	0.40	57	0.05	23	0.14
Kissin 1993		30	0.46	21	0.00	32	0.08	35	0.24	77	0.03	39	0.08
Kushner 1989		19	0.50	43	0.00	33	0.10	30	0.29	71	0.04	30	0.11
Luisada 1991		41	0.42	32	0.00	27	0.08	31	0.29	70	0.04	29	0.11
Lushtak 2004		66	0.34	86	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	86	0.03	60	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.49	52	0.00	21	0.10	26	0.38	40	0.11	17	0.20
Magaloff 1978		7	0.57	26	0.00	10	0.24	12	0.58	17	0.37	7	0.46
Magin 1975		17	0.51	77	0.00	22	0.11	16	0.51	81	0.03	25	0.12
Michalowski 1933		43	0.41	53	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.11	79	0.03	43	0.06
Milkina 1970		11	0.53	7	0.00	20	0.10	15	0.53	61	0.05	22	0.16
Mohovich 1999		34	0.45	67	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.23	82	0.04	36	0.10
Moravec 1969		5	0.61	9	0.00	5	0.43	6	0.66	5	0.64	5	0.65
Morozova 2008		54	0.36	27	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	80	0.03	56	0.04
Neighaus 1950		64	0.34	87	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.04	81	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		20	0.50	39	0.00	14	0.15	14	0.53	34	0.20	11	0.33
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.38	28	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.04	52	0.04
Osinska 1989		32	0.45	68	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.14	74	0.04	40	0.07
Pachmann 1927		50	0.37	69	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	55	0.05	51	0.04
Paderewski 1930		56	0.35	78	0.00	71	0.04	65	0.04	60	0.04	50	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		74	0.31	70	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	84	0.03	66	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		86	0.26	88	0.00	87	0.03	69	0.03	78	0.04	68	0.03
Poblocka 1999		24	0.47	44	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.22	76	0.04	38	0.09
Rabcewiczowa 1932		6	0.57	15	0.00	6	0.24	10	0.59	16	0.39	6	0.48
Rachmaninoff 1923		8	0.54	10	0.00	7	0.27	5	0.71	24	0.30	8	0.46
Rangell 2001		68	0.34	60	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Richter 1976		83	0.26	89	0.00	86	0.03	73	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.03
Rosen 1989		29	0.46	40	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.26	79	0.04	35	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.81	4	0.04	4	0.81	4	0.92	1	0.92	4	0.92
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.87	3	0.09	3	0.81	3	0.94	3	0.94	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.88	1	0.53	1	0.53	2	0.96	3	0.95	2	0.95
Rosenthal 1931c		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931d		3	0.86	2	0.30	2	0.51	1	0.96	3	0.96	1	0.96
Rossi 2007		70	0.33	90	0.00	64	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.04	67	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		31	0.45	24	0.00	17	0.11	21	0.44	43	0.10	16	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		25	0.47	63	0.00	13	0.14	20	0.46	37	0.20	13	0.30
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.38	8	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	69	0.05	55	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		37	0.44	5	0.00	18	0.08	29	0.30	72	0.04	31	0.11
Shebanova 2002		36	0.44	79	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.17	80	0.03	41	0.07
Smith 1975		16	0.52	45	0.00	16	0.21	13	0.57	55	0.05	21	0.17
Sokolov 2002		23	0.49	61	0.00	24	0.10	18	0.47	45	0.06	20	0.17
Sztompka 1959		38	0.43	80	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	76	0.04	47	0.05
Tomsic 1995		78	0.30	81	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.04	71	0.03
Uninsky 1932		46	0.38	33	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.03	75	0.03
Uninsky 1971		67	0.34	54	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	62	0.05	53	0.04
Wasowski 1980		76	0.31	82	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.03	86	0.02
Zak 1937		47	0.38	22	0.00	67	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03	69	0.03
Zak 1951		51	0.37	16	0.00	68	0.04	57	0.04	87	0.02	70	0.03
Random 1		89	-0.10	71	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	32	0.16	44	0.06
Random 2		88	-0.03	72	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	47	0.04	76	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.15	62	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).