Neighaus 1950

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.66	54	0.00	14	0.19	13	0.54	20	0.45	14	0.49
Anderszewski 2003		21	0.59	79	0.00	35	0.09	34	0.19	44	0.10	38	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.61	9	0.02	12	0.16	6	0.60	3	0.61	4	0.60
Bacha 2000		55	0.50	66	0.00	65	0.06	48	0.06	48	0.05	59	0.05
Badura 1965		36	0.54	35	0.00	49	0.05	62	0.05	35	0.30	43	0.12
Barbosa 1983		76	0.40	63	0.00	74	0.05	55	0.05	77	0.04	73	0.04
Biret 1990		50	0.52	26	0.00	58	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.04	78	0.04
Blet 2003		52	0.51	25	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	14	0.40	39	0.14
Block 1995		57	0.50	21	0.01	37	0.05	37	0.16	30	0.22	31	0.19
Blumental 1952		73	0.44	51	0.00	66	0.04	73	0.04	65	0.04	76	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		3	0.68	3	0.08	3	0.20	4	0.62	11	0.58	3	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		71	0.45	61	0.00	75	0.04	79	0.04	70	0.05	68	0.04
Bunin 1987		64	0.48	36	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	17	0.44	34	0.15
Bunin 1987b		70	0.46	24	0.00	57	0.05	49	0.05	20	0.40	36	0.14
Chiu 1999		69	0.47	59	0.00	67	0.05	64	0.05	58	0.05	60	0.05
Cohen 1997		83	0.32	67	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	64	0.04	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		59	0.49	52	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	27	0.39	40	0.14
Csalog 1996		86	0.31	86	0.00	79	0.04	76	0.04	82	0.03	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		5	0.68	7	0.04	10	0.16	11	0.56	15	0.54	10	0.55
Czerny 1990		15	0.60	43	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.24	54	0.06	44	0.12
Duchoud 2007		74	0.43	38	0.00	71	0.05	51	0.05	41	0.15	51	0.09
Ezaki 2006		66	0.48	83	0.00	73	0.05	58	0.05	78	0.04	67	0.04
Falvay 1989		78	0.39	64	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03
Farrell 1958		31	0.56	6	0.05	21	0.07	31	0.25	50	0.07	41	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		62	0.48	39	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	37	0.26	50	0.10
Fliere 1977		10	0.64	68	0.00	15	0.17	16	0.51	44	0.11	27	0.24
Fou 1978		49	0.52	87	0.00	36	0.05	35	0.18	45	0.06	48	0.10
Francois 1956		19	0.60	10	0.02	26	0.06	23	0.35	2	0.64	17	0.47
Friedman 1923		9	0.64	30	0.00	11	0.18	14	0.54	7	0.58	8	0.56
Friedman 1923b		8	0.65	8	0.04	7	0.15	12	0.55	6	0.62	6	0.58
Friedman 1930		14	0.61	70	0.00	24	0.07	22	0.37	17	0.51	19	0.43
Garcia 2007		65	0.48	50	0.00	72	0.06	46	0.06	48	0.06	58	0.06
Garcia 2007b		45	0.53	53	0.00	40	0.04	39	0.14	63	0.04	57	0.07
Gierzod 1998		4	0.68	2	0.08	4	0.25	3	0.69	24	0.46	7	0.56
Gornostaeva 1994		27	0.57	33	0.00	45	0.04	70	0.04	42	0.13	56	0.07
Groot 1988		58	0.50	29	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.12	58	0.05	53	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.61	48	0.00	19	0.18	19	0.44	42	0.15	26	0.26
Hatto 1993		22	0.59	4	0.06	5	0.16	7	0.59	15	0.41	15	0.49
Hatto 1997		20	0.59	55	0.00	8	0.18	10	0.57	17	0.39	16	0.47
Horowitz 1949		48	0.52	56	0.00	39	0.04	40	0.13	22	0.46	28	0.24
Indjic 1988		16	0.60	13	0.01	6	0.18	9	0.59	17	0.42	11	0.50
Kapell 1951		54	0.51	80	0.00	48	0.04	66	0.04	62	0.04	72	0.04
Kissin 1993		11	0.63	11	0.02	13	0.13	8	0.59	19	0.51	9	0.55
Kushner 1989		25	0.58	57	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	56	0.05	62	0.05
Luisada 1991		43	0.53	44	0.00	50	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.09	54	0.07
Lushtak 2004		24	0.58	45	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.39	30	0.29	23	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		56	0.50	46	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.09	52	0.05	55	0.07
Magaloff 1978		53	0.51	62	0.00	63	0.04	74	0.04	67	0.04	70	0.04
Magin 1975		34	0.55	20	0.01	31	0.07	26	0.31	50	0.05	42	0.12
Michalowski 1933		44	0.53	28	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	15	0.46	30	0.19
Milkina 1970		47	0.53	65	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	67	0.05	63	0.05
Mohovich 1999		68	0.48	84	0.00	68	0.05	53	0.05	64	0.04	77	0.04
Moravec 1969		85	0.32	85	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Morozova 2008		41	0.54	27	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	49	0.06	66	0.05
Neighaus 1950		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Niedzielski 1931		30	0.57	23	0.00	20	0.09	29	0.27	19	0.42	22	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.67	22	0.00	9	0.14	5	0.60	11	0.56	5	0.58
Osinska 1989		18	0.60	49	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.29	54	0.07	35	0.14
Pachmann 1927		63	0.48	69	0.00	77	0.04	68	0.04	32	0.25	49	0.10
Paderewski 1930		35	0.55	15	0.01	29	0.06	41	0.13	4	0.61	25	0.28
Perlemuter 1992		42	0.54	47	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	32	0.22	46	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.45	14	0.01	62	0.04	78	0.04	36	0.25	47	0.10
Poblocka 1999		28	0.57	34	0.00	17	0.14	18	0.47	27	0.42	18	0.44
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.48	41	0.00	69	0.07	45	0.07	69	0.04	61	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		38	0.54	16	0.01	41	0.05	38	0.15	62	0.04	52	0.08
Rangell 2001		67	0.48	18	0.01	60	0.04	75	0.04	28	0.35	45	0.12
Richter 1976		29	0.57	37	0.00	33	0.09	30	0.27	18	0.52	20	0.37
Rosen 1989		51	0.51	88	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.04	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.40	72	0.00	76	0.04	77	0.04	51	0.04	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.32	73	0.00	86	0.04	71	0.04	72	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.33	89	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	78	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		81	0.34	74	0.00	83	0.04	82	0.04	77	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.28	75	0.00	87	0.04	81	0.04	83	0.03	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		77	0.40	76	0.00	80	0.03	87	0.03	55	0.06	69	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.48	17	0.01	61	0.04	80	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		79	0.38	42	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	80	0.03	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.54	40	0.00	54	0.04	72	0.04	57	0.06	65	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		17	0.60	12	0.02	18	0.21	15	0.51	20	0.49	12	0.50
Shebanova 2002		2	0.71	5	0.05	2	0.31	2	0.71	8	0.57	2	0.64
Smith 1975		39	0.54	19	0.01	34	0.08	33	0.23	39	0.17	29	0.20
Sokolov 2002		32	0.56	31	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.30	24	0.31	24	0.30
Sztompka 1959		1	0.75	1	0.38	1	0.38	1	0.75	3	0.67	1	0.71
Tomsic 1995		80	0.37	32	0.00	78	0.05	61	0.05	73	0.05	64	0.05
Uninsky 1932		46	0.53	58	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.16	41	0.21	32	0.18
Uninsky 1971		23	0.59	71	0.00	16	0.21	17	0.49	19	0.50	13	0.49
Wasowski 1980		26	0.57	60	0.00	22	0.07	20	0.40	31	0.30	21	0.35
Zak 1937		33	0.55	77	0.00	25	0.06	24	0.35	50	0.07	33	0.16
Zak 1951		40	0.54	78	0.00	28	0.06	25	0.31	57	0.06	37	0.14
Random 1		90	-0.10	90	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	50	0.04	82	0.03
Random 2		89	-0.09	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.08	82	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	77	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).