Morozova 2008

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.64	53	0.00	19	0.10	19	0.42	30	0.35	14	0.38
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.58	28	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.33	33	0.31	27	0.32
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.66	3	0.14	5	0.19	6	0.55	7	0.55	6	0.55
Bacha 2000		68	0.45	79	0.00	65	0.04	63	0.04	45	0.05	70	0.04
Badura 1965		4	0.67	2	0.15	4	0.23	5	0.57	1	0.71	2	0.64
Barbosa 1983		45	0.54	30	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.12	34	0.25	42	0.17
Biret 1990		46	0.53	47	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.23	43	0.11	44	0.16
Blet 2003		55	0.50	39	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	50	0.06	66	0.05
Block 1995		59	0.49	76	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	52	0.05	76	0.04
Blumental 1952		48	0.53	29	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	66	0.04	77	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		22	0.61	55	0.00	18	0.11	23	0.40	33	0.32	19	0.36
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.42	72	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	49	0.06	71	0.04
Bunin 1987		72	0.43	54	0.00	72	0.05	61	0.05	35	0.23	52	0.11
Bunin 1987b		71	0.43	63	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	35	0.25	53	0.10
Chiu 1999		34	0.58	18	0.01	35	0.08	39	0.22	17	0.35	28	0.28
Cohen 1997		87	0.34	67	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	60	0.04	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		67	0.45	36	0.00	73	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.05	69	0.05
Csalog 1996		79	0.41	89	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	48	0.05	75	0.04
Czerny 1949		28	0.60	14	0.01	16	0.11	12	0.46	34	0.35	12	0.40
Czerny 1990		20	0.61	73	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.41	40	0.17	30	0.26
Duchoud 2007		63	0.48	26	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	11	0.41	43	0.16
Ezaki 2006		18	0.62	46	0.00	32	0.06	35	0.25	38	0.19	36	0.22
Falvay 1989		65	0.46	61	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	59	0.06	72	0.04
Farrell 1958		36	0.58	13	0.01	41	0.08	41	0.21	36	0.29	31	0.25
Ferenczy 1958		77	0.41	27	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.03	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		8	0.65	52	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.45	43	0.12	33	0.23
Fou 1978		17	0.63	38	0.00	15	0.10	11	0.48	20	0.42	10	0.45
Francois 1956		70	0.44	48	0.00	58	0.04	71	0.04	36	0.21	57	0.09
Friedman 1923		43	0.54	20	0.01	49	0.05	56	0.05	37	0.27	48	0.12
Friedman 1923b		40	0.56	24	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	34	0.34	45	0.14
Friedman 1930		51	0.52	74	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	42	0.20	54	0.10
Garcia 2007		49	0.53	51	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	32	0.30	47	0.12
Garcia 2007b		52	0.51	64	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	41	0.10	60	0.08
Gierzod 1998		16	0.63	32	0.00	13	0.09	9	0.51	36	0.28	15	0.38
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.48	21	0.01	69	0.05	62	0.05	84	0.03	78	0.04
Groot 1988		62	0.48	22	0.01	53	0.06	48	0.06	63	0.05	67	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.63	80	0.00	27	0.06	29	0.33	41	0.16	34	0.23
Hatto 1993		15	0.63	68	0.00	11	0.08	22	0.41	28	0.27	24	0.33
Hatto 1997		11	0.63	69	0.00	9	0.09	17	0.43	25	0.30	18	0.36
Horowitz 1949		58	0.49	50	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	42	0.18	58	0.08
Indjic 1988		12	0.63	85	0.00	10	0.08	18	0.42	26	0.30	20	0.35
Kapell 1951		38	0.57	34	0.00	17	0.11	15	0.44	31	0.24	25	0.32
Kissin 1993		1	0.69	5	0.07	3	0.19	3	0.62	13	0.61	4	0.61
Kushner 1989		2	0.67	1	0.23	1	0.23	2	0.67	9	0.62	1	0.64
Luisada 1991		7	0.65	10	0.01	20	0.11	24	0.39	21	0.34	16	0.36
Lushtak 2004		31	0.59	35	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.35	27	0.32	23	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		66	0.46	40	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	50	0.05	65	0.05
Magaloff 1978		61	0.48	41	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.06	64	0.05
Magin 1975		3	0.67	9	0.02	6	0.19	4	0.60	5	0.56	5	0.58
Michalowski 1933		64	0.46	87	0.00	67	0.04	75	0.04	41	0.18	59	0.08
Milkina 1970		9	0.64	4	0.10	2	0.17	1	0.68	15	0.54	3	0.61
Mohovich 1999		50	0.52	42	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.11	62	0.07
Moravec 1969		82	0.38	77	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.03	87	0.02
Morozova 2008		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Neighaus 1950		44	0.54	44	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.05	68	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.42	81	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	68	0.03	83	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.61	7	0.02	8	0.11	8	0.51	13	0.52	7	0.51
Osinska 1989		33	0.58	11	0.01	21	0.09	13	0.45	46	0.08	39	0.19
Pachmann 1927		69	0.45	70	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	19	0.41	51	0.11
Paderewski 1930		80	0.41	71	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	65	0.04	84	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.53	66	0.00	59	0.04	72	0.04	47	0.06	63	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.43	75	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	35	0.28	50	0.11
Poblocka 1999		26	0.60	8	0.02	23	0.08	25	0.37	35	0.32	21	0.34
Rabcewiczowa 1932		41	0.56	37	0.00	26	0.06	33	0.28	29	0.26	29	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.55	78	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.22	42	0.13	41	0.17
Rangell 2001		74	0.43	12	0.01	66	0.04	70	0.04	35	0.27	55	0.10
Richter 1976		29	0.60	33	0.00	31	0.05	38	0.22	26	0.46	26	0.32
Rosen 1989		35	0.58	31	0.00	38	0.07	34	0.27	39	0.17	38	0.21
Rosenthal 1930		83	0.38	56	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.38	86	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	53	0.06	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.35	45	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	50	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		84	0.36	65	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	51	0.05	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.34	82	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	56	0.05	79	0.04
Rossi 2007		78	0.41	57	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	64	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		30	0.60	25	0.00	36	0.08	32	0.29	13	0.41	22	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		54	0.51	15	0.01	42	0.08	42	0.17	31	0.32	35	0.23
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.61	43	0.00	25	0.07	20	0.42	28	0.37	13	0.39
Schilhawsky 1960		21	0.61	59	0.00	33	0.07	28	0.34	30	0.39	17	0.36
Shebanova 2002		14	0.63	6	0.03	7	0.12	10	0.50	21	0.37	11	0.43
Smith 1975		57	0.49	90	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	77	0.03	73	0.04
Sokolov 2002		53	0.51	58	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	30	0.24	49	0.11
Sztompka 1959		6	0.65	19	0.01	14	0.10	7	0.51	32	0.41	8	0.46
Tomsic 1995		56	0.49	16	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	10	0.56	32	0.24
Uninsky 1932		19	0.62	17	0.01	22	0.08	16	0.44	15	0.49	9	0.46
Uninsky 1971		39	0.57	62	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.24	38	0.20	37	0.22
Wasowski 1980		37	0.57	60	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.08	61	0.07
Zak 1937		27	0.60	49	0.00	34	0.09	31	0.30	56	0.06	46	0.13
Zak 1951		24	0.61	23	0.01	30	0.06	27	0.34	44	0.10	40	0.18
Random 1		90	-0.11	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.02	84	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	10	0.45	56	0.09
Random 3		89	-0.10	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	67	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).