Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		15	0.67	70	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.47	13	0.50	22	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		11	0.70	4	0.07	4	0.14	9	0.62	3	0.65	9	0.63
Ashkenazy 1981		59	0.55	47	0.00	61	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.06	79	0.06
Bacha 2000		42	0.59	46	0.00	33	0.07	42	0.20	1	0.63	37	0.35
Badura 1965		48	0.58	53	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	9	0.56	49	0.18
Barbosa 1983		66	0.52	8	0.03	14	0.09	34	0.32	10	0.57	30	0.43
Biret 1990		10	0.70	2	0.08	2	0.21	3	0.69	1	0.71	4	0.70
Blet 2003		55	0.56	82	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	6	0.49	51	0.16
Block 1995		60	0.55	87	0.00	56	0.07	45	0.07	21	0.34	54	0.15
Blumental 1952		31	0.62	11	0.02	13	0.13	27	0.45	7	0.52	23	0.48
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.64	37	0.00	29	0.11	28	0.43	26	0.45	27	0.44
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.57	68	0.00	71	0.05	71	0.05	21	0.45	53	0.15
Bunin 1987		86	0.39	74	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.03	90	0.02
Bunin 1987b		87	0.39	83	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	67	0.04	87	0.03
Chiu 1999		70	0.51	72	0.00	68	0.05	70	0.05	34	0.16	72	0.09
Cohen 1997		85	0.41	29	0.00	66	0.04	78	0.04	7	0.46	57	0.14
Cortot 1951		79	0.48	75	0.00	81	0.04	75	0.04	33	0.27	71	0.10
Csalog 1996		67	0.52	13	0.01	62	0.05	63	0.05	24	0.34	63	0.13
Czerny 1949		18	0.66	9	0.03	21	0.09	18	0.50	18	0.53	21	0.51
Czerny 1990		4	0.71	77	0.00	10	0.24	6	0.67	6	0.72	5	0.69
Duchoud 2007		81	0.47	66	0.00	69	0.05	64	0.05	16	0.37	56	0.14
Ezaki 2006		5	0.71	20	0.01	9	0.18	5	0.67	2	0.74	3	0.70
Falvay 1989		36	0.61	43	0.00	48	0.06	56	0.06	10	0.52	48	0.18
Farrell 1958		37	0.60	69	0.00	28	0.09	25	0.45	7	0.58	20	0.51
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.45	84	0.00	87	0.04	77	0.04	56	0.04	85	0.04
Fliere 1977		12	0.69	33	0.00	18	0.12	19	0.49	27	0.32	34	0.40
Fou 1978		6	0.71	3	0.07	7	0.12	10	0.60	2	0.62	11	0.61
Francois 1956		46	0.58	55	0.00	55	0.07	47	0.07	13	0.53	47	0.19
Friedman 1923		68	0.51	27	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	31	0.35	66	0.13
Friedman 1923b		65	0.52	45	0.00	63	0.05	65	0.05	31	0.37	58	0.14
Friedman 1930		73	0.51	19	0.01	70	0.06	50	0.06	39	0.22	70	0.11
Garcia 2007		69	0.51	60	0.00	67	0.05	68	0.05	34	0.27	68	0.12
Garcia 2007b		56	0.56	78	0.00	50	0.05	72	0.05	29	0.34	65	0.13
Gierzod 1998		2	0.72	12	0.01	6	0.15	2	0.71	11	0.61	7	0.66
Gornostaeva 1994		19	0.65	26	0.00	30	0.13	22	0.48	6	0.60	19	0.54
Groot 1988		40	0.59	62	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.33	7	0.48	35	0.40
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.70	7	0.03	8	0.14	4	0.68	3	0.71	6	0.69
Hatto 1993		57	0.56	79	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	51	0.06	80	0.06
Hatto 1997		53	0.56	80	0.00	54	0.07	46	0.07	45	0.07	78	0.07
Horowitz 1949		64	0.52	44	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	27	0.45	62	0.13
Indjic 1988		52	0.57	63	0.00	52	0.06	57	0.06	58	0.05	82	0.05
Kapell 1951		23	0.64	42	0.00	23	0.07	20	0.49	19	0.38	29	0.43
Kissin 1993		14	0.68	35	0.00	15	0.10	12	0.59	16	0.59	15	0.59
Kushner 1989		3	0.71	21	0.01	11	0.15	8	0.63	3	0.67	8	0.65
Luisada 1991		16	0.67	23	0.01	17	0.11	16	0.52	2	0.70	13	0.60
Lushtak 2004		61	0.55	41	0.00	47	0.06	53	0.06	31	0.24	69	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.65	49	0.00	26	0.10	24	0.47	5	0.61	18	0.54
Magaloff 1978		28	0.63	32	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.18	2	0.56	38	0.32
Magin 1975		25	0.64	52	0.00	27	0.08	31	0.41	17	0.46	28	0.43
Michalowski 1933		72	0.51	73	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	37	0.21	73	0.09
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		7	0.71	5	0.05	3	0.14	7	0.67	1	0.78	2	0.72
Moravec 1969		54	0.56	38	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	9	0.60	50	0.17
Morozova 2008		22	0.64	10	0.02	16	0.10	15	0.54	1	0.68	12	0.61
Neighaus 1950		63	0.53	40	0.00	74	0.05	67	0.05	59	0.05	83	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		83	0.45	88	0.00	82	0.05	69	0.05	84	0.03	84	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.60	14	0.01	32	0.07	30	0.42	22	0.43	32	0.42
Osinska 1989		1	0.75	1	0.38	1	0.38	1	0.75	2	0.76	1	0.75
Pachmann 1927		78	0.48	76	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	27	0.31	76	0.08
Paderewski 1930		84	0.43	89	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.04	88	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.57	61	0.00	58	0.05	66	0.05	23	0.35	60	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.49	85	0.00	65	0.04	79	0.04	19	0.42	61	0.13
Poblocka 1999		30	0.62	28	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.23	32	0.37	42	0.29
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.59	50	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	25	0.28	44	0.20
Rachmaninoff 1923		44	0.59	48	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.21	31	0.25	43	0.23
Rangell 2001		51	0.57	81	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	2	0.60	46	0.19
Richter 1976		80	0.47	30	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	46	0.07	81	0.05
Rosen 1989		8	0.70	17	0.01	12	0.24	11	0.60	4	0.67	10	0.63
Rosenthal 1930		74	0.50	67	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	30	0.28	74	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.51	64	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	19	0.46	67	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.50	54	0.00	79	0.04	74	0.04	20	0.42	64	0.13
Rosenthal 1931c		62	0.53	18	0.01	73	0.05	61	0.05	15	0.53	52	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.49	90	0.00	80	0.04	80	0.04	21	0.46	59	0.14
Rossi 2007		41	0.59	16	0.01	45	0.06	54	0.06	2	0.59	45	0.19
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.62	31	0.00	22	0.09	17	0.50	3	0.67	17	0.58
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.61	25	0.01	20	0.10	13	0.55	4	0.65	14	0.60
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.66	6	0.04	5	0.14	14	0.54	6	0.64	16	0.59
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.55	39	0.00	59	0.06	55	0.06	45	0.10	77	0.08
Shebanova 2002		24	0.64	51	0.00	38	0.09	33	0.33	32	0.27	41	0.30
Smith 1975		33	0.61	56	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.23	10	0.44	39	0.32
Sokolov 2002		34	0.61	22	0.01	37	0.09	37	0.29	5	0.57	33	0.41
Sztompka 1959		13	0.68	15	0.01	24	0.08	21	0.48	30	0.43	26	0.45
Tomsic 1995		45	0.59	65	0.00	34	0.07	35	0.32	4	0.65	24	0.46
Uninsky 1932		47	0.58	59	0.00	51	0.05	62	0.05	27	0.42	55	0.14
Uninsky 1971		38	0.60	36	0.00	41	0.08	38	0.24	27	0.42	40	0.32
Wasowski 1980		32	0.62	24	0.01	36	0.08	36	0.31	20	0.43	36	0.37
Zak 1937		27	0.63	71	0.00	31	0.10	29	0.43	23	0.41	31	0.42
Zak 1951		26	0.63	34	0.00	19	0.11	26	0.45	17	0.46	25	0.45
Random 1		89	-0.05	57	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	13	0.42	75	0.09
Random 2		88	-0.03	58	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.08	86	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	33	0.17	86	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).