Kushner 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		32	0.62	38	0.00	48	0.06	54	0.06	45	0.08	68	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		10	0.68	14	0.01	17	0.16	18	0.56	8	0.57	20	0.56
Ashkenazy 1981		42	0.59	36	0.00	49	0.07	47	0.07	28	0.27	53	0.14
Bacha 2000		66	0.52	65	0.00	57	0.05	64	0.05	27	0.24	58	0.11
Badura 1965		53	0.55	61	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	32	0.33	55	0.13
Barbosa 1983		56	0.55	26	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.13	21	0.47	37	0.25
Biret 1990		12	0.68	19	0.01	6	0.12	4	0.65	3	0.64	7	0.64
Blet 2003		54	0.55	85	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	26	0.29	59	0.11
Block 1995		69	0.50	77	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	28	0.24	57	0.12
Blumental 1952		48	0.56	45	0.00	52	0.10	44	0.10	72	0.04	72	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		22	0.66	29	0.00	23	0.14	25	0.50	16	0.54	24	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.53	59	0.00	69	0.05	57	0.05	30	0.32	54	0.13
Bunin 1987		83	0.45	81	0.00	78	0.03	73	0.03	38	0.20	67	0.08
Bunin 1987b		84	0.43	53	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	39	0.19	64	0.08
Chiu 1999		61	0.52	66	0.00	61	0.03	72	0.03	46	0.07	74	0.05
Cohen 1997		87	0.42	42	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	12	0.41	60	0.11
Cortot 1951		86	0.42	50	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	46	0.06	84	0.04
Csalog 1996		52	0.56	27	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.13	10	0.49	38	0.25
Czerny 1949		26	0.64	62	0.00	30	0.12	27	0.42	33	0.38	29	0.40
Czerny 1990		8	0.71	39	0.00	16	0.18	12	0.59	12	0.59	15	0.59
Duchoud 2007		75	0.49	55	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	15	0.37	56	0.12
Ezaki 2006		31	0.63	30	0.00	41	0.07	43	0.13	36	0.21	47	0.17
Falvay 1989		15	0.67	15	0.01	25	0.14	22	0.52	1	0.69	12	0.60
Farrell 1958		27	0.64	11	0.02	19	0.20	13	0.58	3	0.64	10	0.61
Ferenczy 1958		78	0.47	86	0.00	82	0.04	69	0.04	61	0.04	83	0.04
Fliere 1977		7	0.71	16	0.01	12	0.11	10	0.61	25	0.34	27	0.46
Fou 1978		19	0.67	20	0.01	13	0.12	14	0.58	4	0.61	14	0.59
Francois 1956		39	0.60	87	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.32	9	0.59	28	0.43
Friedman 1923		71	0.50	88	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	61	0.05	85	0.04
Friedman 1923b		73	0.50	51	0.00	73	0.02	87	0.02	59	0.05	87	0.03
Friedman 1930		68	0.51	54	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	53	0.06	82	0.04
Garcia 2007		50	0.56	47	0.00	44	0.05	45	0.10	8	0.53	41	0.23
Garcia 2007b		51	0.56	34	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.28	13	0.51	32	0.38
Gierzod 1998		3	0.71	22	0.01	14	0.11	6	0.64	22	0.52	16	0.58
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.62	43	0.00	37	0.09	38	0.23	12	0.56	34	0.36
Groot 1988		59	0.53	23	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.13	21	0.32	44	0.20
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.64	25	0.00	27	0.12	28	0.41	32	0.31	35	0.36
Hatto 1993		41	0.59	72	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.21	38	0.20	45	0.20
Hatto 1997		38	0.60	68	0.00	39	0.10	34	0.27	37	0.16	43	0.21
Horowitz 1949		85	0.43	37	0.00	87	0.04	66	0.04	62	0.06	75	0.05
Indjic 1988		37	0.60	89	0.00	38	0.07	35	0.27	33	0.22	39	0.24
Kapell 1951		18	0.67	4	0.08	4	0.12	19	0.55	4	0.57	19	0.56
Kissin 1993		20	0.67	17	0.01	26	0.14	26	0.48	27	0.47	26	0.47
Kushner 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991		30	0.63	44	0.00	32	0.08	37	0.23	24	0.33	36	0.28
Lushtak 2004		17	0.67	5	0.06	5	0.12	5	0.65	1	0.76	1	0.70
Malcuzynski 1961		62	0.52	52	0.00	66	0.05	63	0.05	62	0.04	81	0.04
Magaloff 1978		49	0.56	63	0.00	60	0.04	70	0.04	34	0.19	63	0.09
Magin 1975		21	0.66	2	0.14	2	0.14	21	0.53	13	0.52	22	0.52
Michalowski 1933		64	0.52	82	0.00	65	0.05	62	0.05	19	0.41	52	0.14
Milkina 1970		5	0.71	6	0.03	8	0.11	3	0.67	8	0.63	5	0.65
Mohovich 1999		23	0.65	49	0.00	24	0.14	23	0.52	12	0.63	18	0.57
Moravec 1969		70	0.50	60	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	43	0.13	70	0.06
Morozova 2008		16	0.67	13	0.01	10	0.11	9	0.62	2	0.67	6	0.64
Neighaus 1950		45	0.58	70	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	63	0.05	79	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		76	0.48	78	0.00	74	0.02	85	0.02	71	0.03	88	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.69	21	0.01	18	0.15	17	0.57	3	0.66	11	0.61
Osinska 1989		2	0.71	1	0.35	1	0.35	2	0.69	7	0.64	3	0.66
Pachmann 1927		58	0.54	69	0.00	68	0.06	55	0.06	2	0.59	46	0.19
Paderewski 1930		72	0.50	64	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	6	0.57	51	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		34	0.62	73	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.25	8	0.57	31	0.38
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.54	67	0.00	50	0.07	48	0.07	2	0.62	42	0.21
Poblocka 1999		25	0.65	12	0.01	29	0.10	29	0.37	31	0.41	30	0.39
Rabcewiczowa 1932		24	0.65	8	0.02	11	0.09	8	0.63	1	0.70	4	0.66
Rachmaninoff 1923		63	0.52	74	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	82	0.03	80	0.04
Rangell 2001		44	0.58	7	0.02	28	0.10	30	0.32	1	0.71	25	0.48
Richter 1976		67	0.52	35	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	39	0.23	65	0.08
Rosen 1989		11	0.68	9	0.02	7	0.11	20	0.54	10	0.58	21	0.56
Rosenthal 1930		80	0.46	75	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	56	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.47	56	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	36	0.22	66	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.48	71	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	25	0.31	62	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		74	0.50	28	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	30	0.29	61	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.45	76	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	40	0.18	69	0.07
Rossi 2007		81	0.46	33	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	42	0.13	73	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.60	57	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	8	0.49	48	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.63	18	0.01	22	0.13	16	0.58	3	0.67	9	0.62
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.71	10	0.02	15	0.14	1	0.70	4	0.67	2	0.68
Schilhawsky 1960		46	0.57	40	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	51	0.06	76	0.05
Shebanova 2002		1	0.72	3	0.08	3	0.12	7	0.63	7	0.57	13	0.60
Smith 1975		36	0.61	24	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	14	0.40	50	0.15
Sokolov 2002		43	0.59	41	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	19	0.40	49	0.15
Sztompka 1959		6	0.71	31	0.00	9	0.14	11	0.60	5	0.64	8	0.62
Tomsic 1995		47	0.57	32	0.00	51	0.09	46	0.09	8	0.59	40	0.23
Uninsky 1932		65	0.52	83	0.00	64	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.05	77	0.05
Uninsky 1971		55	0.55	79	0.00	59	0.07	49	0.07	52	0.06	71	0.06
Wasowski 1980		35	0.62	48	0.00	33	0.06	32	0.31	17	0.45	33	0.37
Zak 1937		14	0.68	80	0.00	21	0.13	24	0.52	12	0.53	23	0.52
Zak 1951		13	0.68	46	0.00	20	0.17	15	0.58	9	0.56	17	0.57
Random 1		89	-0.06	58	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	38	0.13	78	0.05
Random 2		88	-0.06	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	75	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.11	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).