Harasiewicz 1955

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.69	39	0.00	25	0.12	26	0.48	17	0.48	27	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		5	0.73	20	0.01	17	0.13	21	0.54	5	0.59	18	0.56
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.62	45	0.00	35	0.10	34	0.29	10	0.46	33	0.37
Bacha 2000		74	0.48	54	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.04	87	0.03
Badura 1965		22	0.67	23	0.01	30	0.07	35	0.28	14	0.52	32	0.38
Barbosa 1983		47	0.60	17	0.01	46	0.05	50	0.05	6	0.59	48	0.17
Biret 1990		46	0.61	33	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.45	10	0.50	28	0.47
Blet 2003		59	0.55	40	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	37	0.17	77	0.07
Block 1995		39	0.62	27	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.11	9	0.53	40	0.24
Blumental 1952		50	0.59	78	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.18	22	0.29	44	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		7	0.73	1	0.23	1	0.23	11	0.62	2	0.67	11	0.64
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.55	26	0.01	73	0.05	62	0.05	26	0.40	54	0.14
Bunin 1987		75	0.46	74	0.00	70	0.06	46	0.06	15	0.46	49	0.17
Bunin 1987b		77	0.46	79	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	14	0.46	56	0.14
Chiu 1999		45	0.61	80	0.00	62	0.04	74	0.04	29	0.19	71	0.09
Cohen 1997		83	0.39	36	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	58	0.04	89	0.03
Cortot 1951		55	0.57	30	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	3	0.69	45	0.19
Csalog 1996		80	0.44	71	0.00	65	0.04	73	0.04	27	0.30	67	0.11
Czerny 1949		3	0.74	3	0.10	3	0.15	8	0.68	6	0.66	8	0.67
Czerny 1990		4	0.73	4	0.10	7	0.13	4	0.71	4	0.73	3	0.72
Duchoud 2007		82	0.43	89	0.00	80	0.05	53	0.05	26	0.27	62	0.12
Ezaki 2006		1	0.76	7	0.03	9	0.11	5	0.70	1	0.76	1	0.73
Falvay 1989		62	0.54	16	0.01	74	0.04	72	0.04	43	0.16	74	0.08
Farrell 1958		53	0.59	69	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	31	0.36	58	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.60	61	0.00	64	0.05	51	0.05	9	0.53	53	0.16
Fliere 1977		8	0.72	31	0.00	14	0.13	13	0.60	12	0.50	19	0.55
Fou 1978		16	0.70	62	0.00	21	0.12	22	0.52	7	0.57	22	0.54
Francois 1956		67	0.50	66	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	41	0.14	78	0.07
Friedman 1923		37	0.63	51	0.00	55	0.07	45	0.07	13	0.51	46	0.19
Friedman 1923b		33	0.63	65	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	11	0.55	50	0.17
Friedman 1930		36	0.63	56	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	10	0.53	52	0.16
Garcia 2007		63	0.54	81	0.00	61	0.03	82	0.03	27	0.40	68	0.11
Garcia 2007b		56	0.56	57	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.20	16	0.49	36	0.31
Gierzod 1998		6	0.73	8	0.03	5	0.19	2	0.74	5	0.67	5	0.70
Gornostaeva 1994		48	0.60	67	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	26	0.32	57	0.14
Groot 1988		70	0.50	85	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	53	0.06	81	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		15	0.70	12	0.01	19	0.12	18	0.57	8	0.53	21	0.55
Hatto 1997		14	0.70	82	0.00	24	0.11	20	0.54	8	0.53	24	0.53
Horowitz 1949		54	0.58	55	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	4	0.57	47	0.17
Indjic 1988		12	0.70	46	0.00	23	0.11	19	0.55	11	0.51	23	0.53
Kapell 1951		31	0.64	5	0.06	8	0.12	14	0.59	2	0.64	14	0.61
Kissin 1993		9	0.72	13	0.01	10	0.14	6	0.70	3	0.73	4	0.71
Kushner 1989		30	0.64	37	0.00	31	0.08	32	0.31	28	0.41	34	0.36
Luisada 1991		29	0.64	86	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	35	0.20	69	0.10
Lushtak 2004		27	0.66	25	0.01	36	0.07	33	0.31	13	0.52	31	0.40
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.64	11	0.02	18	0.12	15	0.59	2	0.68	12	0.63
Magaloff 1978		69	0.50	50	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	61	0.04	88	0.03
Magin 1975		26	0.66	38	0.00	20	0.11	25	0.50	10	0.53	25	0.51
Michalowski 1933		65	0.52	52	0.00	60	0.03	83	0.03	18	0.43	66	0.11
Milkina 1970		13	0.70	9	0.02	12	0.15	3	0.71	4	0.68	7	0.69
Mohovich 1999		51	0.59	58	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.14	27	0.41	42	0.24
Moravec 1969		73	0.49	44	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	31	0.25	70	0.09
Morozova 2008		32	0.63	64	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.16	29	0.33	43	0.23
Neighaus 1950		41	0.61	83	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.15	19	0.44	39	0.26
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.53	42	0.00	66	0.03	79	0.03	38	0.17	76	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.61	32	0.00	27	0.10	29	0.41	19	0.45	29	0.43
Osinska 1989		2	0.74	6	0.03	6	0.20	1	0.76	4	0.71	2	0.73
Pachmann 1927		72	0.49	75	0.00	83	0.03	87	0.03	31	0.26	73	0.09
Paderewski 1930		81	0.44	59	0.00	81	0.04	63	0.04	33	0.22	72	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.59	76	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	27	0.31	59	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.46	49	0.00	67	0.04	75	0.04	25	0.38	60	0.12
Poblocka 1999		20	0.68	19	0.01	15	0.17	17	0.58	5	0.61	16	0.59
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.51	35	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.05	82	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		35	0.63	72	0.00	38	0.05	39	0.18	18	0.37	38	0.26
Rangell 2001		71	0.49	41	0.00	47	0.05	56	0.05	3	0.59	51	0.17
Richter 1976		21	0.68	28	0.00	22	0.14	24	0.50	4	0.67	17	0.58
Rosen 1989		38	0.62	53	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.17	24	0.34	41	0.24
Rosenthal 1930		79	0.45	63	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	25	0.35	63	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.36	48	0.00	85	0.04	64	0.04	48	0.06	80	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.35	87	0.00	86	0.04	65	0.04	58	0.05	85	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.35	73	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	48	0.06	86	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.34	77	0.00	87	0.04	70	0.04	59	0.04	84	0.04
Rossi 2007		58	0.55	43	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	24	0.33	64	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.55	60	0.00	58	0.04	76	0.04	31	0.32	65	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.45	47	0.00	71	0.05	59	0.05	48	0.07	79	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.61	10	0.02	29	0.08	37	0.20	22	0.46	37	0.30
Schilhawsky 1960		18	0.69	18	0.01	26	0.18	23	0.51	9	0.59	20	0.55
Shebanova 2002		34	0.63	21	0.01	34	0.11	30	0.40	30	0.30	35	0.35
Smith 1975		43	0.61	70	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	13	0.42	55	0.14
Sokolov 2002		57	0.55	84	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.33	9	0.50	30	0.41
Sztompka 1959		10	0.71	29	0.00	11	0.15	12	0.61	11	0.59	15	0.60
Tomsic 1995		68	0.50	34	0.00	59	0.03	78	0.03	23	0.46	61	0.12
Uninsky 1932		24	0.66	14	0.01	16	0.14	16	0.58	2	0.68	13	0.63
Uninsky 1971		25	0.66	24	0.01	13	0.13	10	0.63	2	0.68	10	0.65
Wasowski 1980		23	0.66	22	0.01	32	0.07	28	0.41	6	0.58	26	0.49
Zak 1937		11	0.70	2	0.16	2	0.17	7	0.69	3	0.70	6	0.69
Zak 1951		19	0.69	15	0.01	4	0.16	9	0.66	2	0.67	9	0.66
Random 1		88	-0.06	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	37	0.13	83	0.04
Random 2		89	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.08	68	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	9	0.36	75	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).