Garcia 2007b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.58	71	0.00	30	0.07	25	0.38	47	0.07	36	0.16
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.50	85	0.00	45	0.04	65	0.04	55	0.04	74	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.49	52	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	60	0.05	78	0.04
Bacha 2000		66	0.45	76	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04	63	0.04
Badura 1965		75	0.42	72	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	52	0.06	76	0.04
Barbosa 1983		83	0.37	63	0.00	69	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.06	72	0.04
Biret 1990		18	0.56	57	0.00	27	0.07	20	0.47	33	0.23	25	0.33
Blet 2003		69	0.45	58	0.00	70	0.04	61	0.04	49	0.06	59	0.05
Block 1995		80	0.40	48	0.00	68	0.03	84	0.03	51	0.06	77	0.04
Blumental 1952		46	0.51	88	0.00	37	0.09	37	0.21	79	0.04	48	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		29	0.53	55	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.34	45	0.08	37	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.42	53	0.00	81	0.05	47	0.05	76	0.04	65	0.04
Bunin 1987		77	0.42	37	0.00	76	0.04	57	0.04	43	0.13	51	0.07
Bunin 1987b		79	0.42	38	0.00	75	0.05	53	0.05	41	0.16	46	0.09
Chiu 1999		54	0.49	17	0.00	64	0.03	87	0.03	52	0.05	66	0.04
Cohen 1997		73	0.43	14	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	10	0.42	40	0.13
Cortot 1951		64	0.46	30	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.10	22	0.46	31	0.21
Csalog 1996		76	0.42	43	0.00	74	0.04	54	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.04
Czerny 1949		25	0.54	40	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.46	37	0.28	18	0.36
Czerny 1990		39	0.51	89	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.05
Duchoud 2007		53	0.49	51	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	14	0.38	42	0.12
Ezaki 2006		52	0.49	25	0.00	65	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.04	83	0.03
Falvay 1989		63	0.46	31	0.00	80	0.06	45	0.06	60	0.06	54	0.06
Farrell 1958		15	0.57	23	0.00	6	0.17	4	0.60	12	0.53	3	0.56
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.48	77	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.10	30	0.34	34	0.18
Fliere 1977		5	0.63	27	0.00	5	0.17	5	0.60	35	0.20	20	0.35
Fou 1978		11	0.58	46	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.48	30	0.25	21	0.35
Francois 1956		42	0.51	81	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.11	19	0.47	29	0.23
Friedman 1923		55	0.48	16	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.13	53	0.07
Friedman 1923b		56	0.48	24	0.00	61	0.03	79	0.03	46	0.07	61	0.05
Friedman 1930		44	0.51	10	0.01	58	0.04	74	0.04	37	0.24	45	0.10
Garcia 2007		1	0.81	1	0.82	1	0.81	1	0.88	1	0.93	1	0.90
Garcia 2007b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gierzod 1998		9	0.59	59	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.49	46	0.07	33	0.19
Gornostaeva 1994		13	0.58	2	0.02	24	0.07	24	0.39	22	0.35	15	0.37
Groot 1988		60	0.48	4	0.01	14	0.07	32	0.26	37	0.13	35	0.18
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.56	20	0.00	11	0.08	16	0.49	36	0.20	26	0.31
Hatto 1993		30	0.53	64	0.00	12	0.09	15	0.51	30	0.26	19	0.36
Hatto 1997		26	0.54	34	0.00	8	0.16	8	0.53	26	0.27	13	0.38
Horowitz 1949		67	0.45	86	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	50	0.07	57	0.05
Indjic 1988		27	0.54	33	0.00	9	0.12	10	0.53	27	0.30	10	0.40
Kapell 1951		3	0.63	8	0.01	2	0.26	2	0.61	11	0.45	6	0.52
Kissin 1993		32	0.52	65	0.00	47	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04
Kushner 1989		19	0.56	32	0.00	19	0.08	13	0.51	33	0.28	12	0.38
Luisada 1991		35	0.52	83	0.00	51	0.05	46	0.05	53	0.06	55	0.05
Lushtak 2004		28	0.53	78	0.00	32	0.09	27	0.35	32	0.23	27	0.28
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.49	22	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.13	42	0.09	43	0.11
Magaloff 1978		61	0.47	28	0.00	67	0.03	85	0.03	62	0.04	85	0.03
Magin 1975		8	0.59	11	0.01	17	0.07	12	0.52	34	0.28	11	0.38
Michalowski 1933		72	0.44	15	0.00	52	0.04	62	0.04	40	0.20	47	0.09
Milkina 1970		21	0.56	82	0.00	33	0.08	29	0.34	72	0.05	39	0.13
Mohovich 1999		24	0.54	90	0.00	36	0.09	33	0.25	39	0.17	30	0.21
Moravec 1969		62	0.47	29	0.00	78	0.04	64	0.04	57	0.05	64	0.04
Morozova 2008		40	0.51	36	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.10	46	0.06	50	0.08
Neighaus 1950		31	0.53	49	0.00	46	0.04	63	0.04	39	0.14	52	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.46	18	0.00	60	0.04	76	0.04	46	0.06	56	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.55	41	0.00	18	0.07	11	0.52	30	0.34	9	0.42
Osinska 1989		4	0.63	13	0.00	3	0.27	3	0.61	19	0.51	2	0.56
Pachmann 1927		82	0.38	21	0.00	83	0.04	77	0.04	72	0.03	86	0.03
Paderewski 1930		57	0.48	79	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	11	0.52	32	0.20
Perlemuter 1992		16	0.57	60	0.00	26	0.07	18	0.48	9	0.54	7	0.51
Pierdomenico 2008		33	0.52	12	0.00	16	0.07	36	0.23	6	0.55	16	0.36
Poblocka 1999		34	0.52	73	0.00	35	0.08	31	0.28	45	0.06	38	0.13
Rabcewiczowa 1932		17	0.56	9	0.01	28	0.07	23	0.41	18	0.33	14	0.37
Rachmaninoff 1923		38	0.52	54	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.12	58	0.05	49	0.08
Rangell 2001		71	0.44	50	0.00	63	0.03	83	0.03	54	0.05	79	0.04
Richter 1976		68	0.45	26	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	45	0.10	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		7	0.60	44	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.46	33	0.27	22	0.35
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.39	80	0.00	82	0.05	52	0.05	67	0.03	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.33	69	0.00	87	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.35	70	0.00	85	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		84	0.35	74	0.00	84	0.04	73	0.04	79	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.34	66	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	46	0.06	80	0.04
Rossi 2007		36	0.52	7	0.01	25	0.08	35	0.23	10	0.46	24	0.33
Rubinstein 1939		47	0.51	35	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	39	0.20	44	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		59	0.48	3	0.01	59	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.04	82	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.52	6	0.01	15	0.08	34	0.25	53	0.06	41	0.12
Schilhawsky 1960		48	0.50	19	0.00	34	0.10	30	0.33	37	0.19	28	0.25
Shebanova 2002		10	0.59	56	0.00	13	0.11	9	0.53	35	0.25	17	0.36
Smith 1975		43	0.51	45	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	64	0.04	67	0.04
Sokolov 2002		70	0.44	87	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	74	0.03	84	0.03
Sztompka 1959		2	0.64	39	0.00	4	0.20	6	0.59	27	0.48	5	0.53
Tomsic 1995		74	0.43	61	0.00	79	0.04	55	0.04	67	0.05	70	0.04
Uninsky 1932		23	0.54	67	0.00	31	0.10	26	0.35	33	0.34	23	0.34
Uninsky 1971		12	0.58	47	0.00	10	0.12	14	0.51	25	0.47	8	0.49
Wasowski 1980		6	0.62	5	0.01	7	0.14	7	0.56	11	0.53	4	0.54
Zak 1937		45	0.51	62	0.00	56	0.05	49	0.05	74	0.04	68	0.04
Zak 1951		41	0.51	68	0.00	50	0.04	58	0.04	74	0.04	69	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.16	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	61	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.11	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.06	42	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	38	0.13	60	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).