Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.55	68	0.00	30	0.09	26	0.41	46	0.07	19	0.17
Anderszewski 2003		29	0.52	15	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.36	68	0.04	35	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.47	54	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.04
Bacha 2000		69	0.42	29	0.00	72	0.05	58	0.05	69	0.04	58	0.04
Badura 1965		73	0.41	55	0.00	69	0.03	85	0.03	67	0.05	67	0.04
Barbosa 1983		82	0.36	76	0.00	64	0.04	78	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04
Biret 1990		15	0.54	39	0.00	18	0.12	12	0.51	53	0.05	25	0.16
Blet 2003		46	0.48	60	0.00	50	0.04	64	0.04	45	0.08	48	0.06
Block 1995		70	0.41	46	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.19	63	0.04	42	0.09
Blumental 1952		26	0.52	52	0.00	35	0.10	35	0.27	82	0.03	43	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.54	4	0.01	10	0.11	25	0.41	58	0.05	29	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		86	0.32	57	0.00	87	0.04	80	0.04	81	0.03	75	0.03
Bunin 1987		78	0.38	70	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	75	0.03	84	0.03
Bunin 1987b		79	0.38	58	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.03	80	0.03
Chiu 1999		53	0.46	61	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.03	76	0.03
Cohen 1997		76	0.39	35	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	51	0.05	69	0.04
Cortot 1951		43	0.49	85	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.14	25	0.41	12	0.24
Csalog 1996		63	0.43	17	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	46	0.06	47	0.06
Czerny 1949		19	0.54	12	0.00	31	0.10	23	0.41	57	0.05	28	0.14
Czerny 1990		41	0.49	80	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	77	0.04	71	0.04
Duchoud 2007		49	0.48	36	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.13	20	0.32	15	0.20
Ezaki 2006		44	0.49	82	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.03	72	0.03
Falvay 1989		64	0.43	24	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.05	61	0.04
Farrell 1958		9	0.57	5	0.01	5	0.14	5	0.59	17	0.46	5	0.52
Ferenczy 1958		66	0.42	71	0.00	67	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03
Fliere 1977		3	0.61	18	0.00	4	0.23	2	0.61	55	0.05	17	0.17
Fou 1978		10	0.57	13	0.00	17	0.13	15	0.50	60	0.05	22	0.16
Francois 1956		56	0.46	62	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	51	0.05	57	0.05
Friedman 1923		68	0.42	47	0.00	79	0.04	61	0.04	80	0.03	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		71	0.41	44	0.00	80	0.05	59	0.05	76	0.04	70	0.04
Friedman 1930		57	0.46	19	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	73	0.04	64	0.04
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		1	0.81	1	0.88	1	0.87	1	0.93	1	0.88	1	0.90
Gierzod 1998		4	0.58	25	0.00	14	0.08	9	0.53	57	0.05	23	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		21	0.53	28	0.00	25	0.06	31	0.31	83	0.03	40	0.10
Groot 1988		65	0.42	34	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.19	54	0.05	41	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		18	0.54	21	0.00	11	0.08	27	0.40	82	0.03	39	0.11
Hatto 1993		30	0.52	72	0.00	23	0.07	28	0.39	67	0.04	37	0.12
Hatto 1997		23	0.53	83	0.00	13	0.08	21	0.45	48	0.07	16	0.18
Horowitz 1949		62	0.43	49	0.00	77	0.05	50	0.05	59	0.06	50	0.05
Indjic 1988		27	0.52	77	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.41	55	0.05	27	0.14
Kapell 1951		8	0.57	11	0.00	3	0.20	3	0.60	30	0.24	7	0.38
Kissin 1993		33	0.51	86	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	72	0.04	53	0.05
Kushner 1989		12	0.56	40	0.00	9	0.11	8	0.53	45	0.10	13	0.23
Luisada 1991		54	0.46	84	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	78	0.03	74	0.03
Lushtak 2004		38	0.50	59	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.05	54	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.51	16	0.00	26	0.08	19	0.45	37	0.13	11	0.24
Magaloff 1978		74	0.41	63	0.00	78	0.05	55	0.05	78	0.03	60	0.04
Magin 1975		5	0.58	26	0.00	15	0.10	7	0.55	75	0.03	30	0.13
Michalowski 1933		77	0.39	20	0.00	71	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05
Milkina 1970		31	0.51	30	0.00	40	0.10	34	0.27	68	0.05	34	0.12
Mohovich 1999		34	0.51	56	0.00	22	0.06	29	0.37	48	0.08	20	0.17
Moravec 1969		58	0.45	69	0.00	75	0.04	79	0.04	70	0.03	73	0.03
Morozova 2008		24	0.53	53	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.30	52	0.05	36	0.12
Neighaus 1950		50	0.48	78	0.00	61	0.06	48	0.06	46	0.06	49	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		42	0.49	3	0.01	37	0.07	38	0.22	45	0.07	33	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.53	79	0.00	12	0.10	10	0.52	65	0.04	26	0.14
Osinska 1989		6	0.58	23	0.00	6	0.14	6	0.58	42	0.14	10	0.28
Pachmann 1927		80	0.38	33	0.00	81	0.04	75	0.04	67	0.03	81	0.03
Paderewski 1930		36	0.50	7	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.27	9	0.53	8	0.38
Perlemuter 1992		11	0.57	42	0.00	8	0.13	11	0.52	11	0.52	3	0.52
Pierdomenico 2008		35	0.51	2	0.01	7	0.13	14	0.50	4	0.59	2	0.54
Poblocka 1999		40	0.49	73	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.21	79	0.03	44	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		13	0.56	48	0.00	20	0.09	13	0.51	52	0.05	21	0.16
Rachmaninoff 1923		37	0.50	6	0.01	27	0.08	33	0.30	73	0.04	38	0.11
Rangell 2001		72	0.41	43	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	45	0.07	55	0.05
Richter 1976		60	0.44	37	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	52	0.06	51	0.05
Rosen 1989		17	0.54	45	0.00	28	0.06	24	0.41	50	0.06	24	0.16
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.36	87	0.00	82	0.04	76	0.04	55	0.04	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.31	81	0.00	86	0.03	87	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.33	31	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		84	0.33	64	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.34	74	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	62	0.04	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		16	0.54	9	0.00	24	0.07	17	0.49	4	0.56	4	0.52
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.46	50	0.00	56	0.04	77	0.04	80	0.03	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		75	0.40	27	0.00	60	0.05	49	0.05	61	0.05	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.48	75	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.13	68	0.05	45	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.52	8	0.00	29	0.07	20	0.45	44	0.10	14	0.21
Shebanova 2002		25	0.52	51	0.00	19	0.11	18	0.48	48	0.06	18	0.17
Smith 1975		67	0.42	10	0.00	68	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.04	77	0.03
Sokolov 2002		61	0.43	14	0.00	59	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.03	59	0.04
Sztompka 1959		2	0.61	22	0.00	2	0.18	4	0.60	34	0.36	6	0.46
Tomsic 1995		59	0.44	41	0.00	49	0.05	60	0.05	28	0.36	31	0.13
Uninsky 1932		47	0.48	88	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.04	65	0.04
Uninsky 1971		39	0.49	38	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.25	49	0.07	32	0.13
Wasowski 1980		7	0.57	89	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.49	39	0.20	9	0.31
Zak 1937		52	0.47	67	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.03	79	0.03
Zak 1951		48	0.48	65	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	83	0.04	62	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.15	66	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	69	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.08	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	53	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.02	32	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	28	0.23	46	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).