Farrell 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.56	16	0.01	38	0.08	40	0.22	64	0.05	53	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		15	0.58	69	0.00	23	0.12	16	0.47	32	0.34	24	0.40
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.52	31	0.00	55	0.07	47	0.07	56	0.05	62	0.06
Bacha 2000		32	0.56	52	0.00	32	0.08	34	0.32	4	0.52	22	0.41
Badura 1965		71	0.43	62	0.00	77	0.04	78	0.04	72	0.04	77	0.04
Barbosa 1983		28	0.57	40	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.33	23	0.45	25	0.39
Biret 1990		7	0.62	23	0.00	9	0.14	8	0.57	14	0.46	14	0.51
Blet 2003		77	0.37	89	0.00	78	0.04	79	0.04	79	0.03	86	0.03
Block 1995		60	0.48	78	0.00	47	0.06	56	0.06	29	0.22	49	0.11
Blumental 1952		23	0.57	84	0.00	35	0.09	32	0.33	47	0.06	41	0.14
Boshniakovich 1969		55	0.48	51	0.00	57	0.07	46	0.07	60	0.05	61	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		66	0.46	75	0.00	73	0.05	66	0.05	66	0.05	64	0.05
Bunin 1987		87	0.28	70	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	86	0.03	90	0.03
Bunin 1987b		86	0.29	73	0.00	87	0.04	77	0.04	87	0.02	82	0.03
Chiu 1999		39	0.55	79	0.00	54	0.07	49	0.07	47	0.07	57	0.07
Cohen 1997		65	0.47	65	0.00	69	0.04	75	0.04	23	0.29	50	0.11
Cortot 1951		44	0.53	26	0.00	50	0.06	59	0.06	8	0.59	35	0.19
Csalog 1996		83	0.34	85	0.00	65	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.03	85	0.03
Czerny 1949		11	0.59	2	0.15	3	0.15	6	0.59	29	0.42	16	0.50
Czerny 1990		1	0.65	9	0.02	4	0.13	4	0.64	13	0.53	5	0.58
Duchoud 2007		69	0.45	63	0.00	64	0.06	53	0.06	28	0.25	47	0.12
Ezaki 2006		8	0.61	5	0.03	14	0.10	23	0.43	34	0.28	27	0.35
Falvay 1989		25	0.57	14	0.01	30	0.09	30	0.37	15	0.49	20	0.43
Farrell 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ferenczy 1958		79	0.36	71	0.00	83	0.03	87	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.03
Fliere 1977		35	0.56	41	0.00	27	0.10	22	0.43	61	0.05	37	0.15
Fou 1978		17	0.58	76	0.00	17	0.07	13	0.51	25	0.33	23	0.41
Francois 1956		42	0.54	18	0.01	18	0.08	24	0.42	5	0.61	15	0.51
Friedman 1923		59	0.48	39	0.00	71	0.06	63	0.06	54	0.05	73	0.05
Friedman 1923b		53	0.49	49	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	65	0.05	79	0.04
Friedman 1930		57	0.48	59	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.04
Garcia 2007		21	0.57	12	0.02	16	0.08	17	0.46	5	0.59	12	0.52
Garcia 2007b		20	0.57	10	0.02	12	0.14	12	0.53	4	0.60	7	0.56
Gierzod 1998		40	0.55	13	0.01	31	0.09	29	0.37	48	0.06	39	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		58	0.48	72	0.00	61	0.06	60	0.06	75	0.03	80	0.04
Groot 1988		26	0.57	38	0.00	15	0.09	20	0.45	10	0.47	18	0.46
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.59	35	0.00	25	0.09	31	0.36	52	0.05	44	0.13
Hatto 1993		18	0.58	57	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.18	47	0.06	54	0.10
Hatto 1997		33	0.56	81	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.14	47	0.07	52	0.10
Horowitz 1949		85	0.32	80	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03
Indjic 1988		29	0.57	64	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.19	48	0.06	48	0.11
Kapell 1951		51	0.50	36	0.00	29	0.09	26	0.41	43	0.12	32	0.22
Kissin 1993		22	0.57	19	0.01	24	0.10	19	0.45	40	0.28	28	0.35
Kushner 1989		5	0.64	8	0.02	2	0.18	3	0.64	13	0.58	2	0.61
Luisada 1991		54	0.48	43	0.00	68	0.05	67	0.05	72	0.03	74	0.04
Lushtak 2004		4	0.64	17	0.01	11	0.11	11	0.53	9	0.55	10	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.52	32	0.00	48	0.06	54	0.06	28	0.24	46	0.12
Magaloff 1978		13	0.58	24	0.00	19	0.08	27	0.40	5	0.52	17	0.46
Magin 1975		49	0.51	58	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	59	0.04	59	0.06
Michalowski 1933		84	0.34	86	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.03
Milkina 1970		10	0.60	66	0.00	10	0.11	7	0.58	25	0.45	13	0.51
Mohovich 1999		38	0.55	53	0.00	20	0.08	15	0.50	29	0.38	19	0.44
Moravec 1969		63	0.47	48	0.00	63	0.06	58	0.06	30	0.28	42	0.13
Morozova 2008		19	0.58	29	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.29	41	0.21	31	0.25
Neighaus 1950		30	0.56	25	0.00	46	0.07	50	0.07	31	0.25	43	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.47	42	0.00	66	0.03	80	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.58	44	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.23	36	0.20	34	0.21
Osinska 1989		6	0.62	1	0.38	1	0.38	2	0.68	14	0.58	1	0.63
Pachmann 1927		73	0.41	74	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	25	0.34	51	0.10
Paderewski 1930		70	0.44	46	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	19	0.45	36	0.16
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.50	77	0.00	53	0.06	61	0.06	42	0.13	55	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.48	15	0.01	22	0.10	21	0.44	1	0.68	8	0.55
Poblocka 1999		62	0.48	28	0.00	56	0.07	48	0.07	54	0.05	58	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		31	0.56	21	0.01	13	0.13	18	0.45	13	0.42	21	0.43
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.56	67	0.00	26	0.08	28	0.40	30	0.26	29	0.32
Rangell 2001		68	0.46	34	0.00	34	0.09	38	0.24	5	0.57	26	0.37
Richter 1976		74	0.41	20	0.01	74	0.04	72	0.04	49	0.06	65	0.05
Rosen 1989		47	0.51	61	0.00	49	0.06	57	0.06	47	0.06	60	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.38	50	0.00	81	0.04	74	0.04	75	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.37	37	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	46	0.07	67	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.35	90	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	44	0.10	71	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.35	56	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	46	0.06	72	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.35	87	0.00	82	0.04	68	0.04	45	0.07	70	0.05
Rossi 2007		27	0.57	11	0.02	21	0.08	14	0.50	3	0.57	11	0.53
Rubinstein 1939		9	0.61	6	0.02	8	0.15	10	0.54	4	0.57	9	0.55
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.57	4	0.05	6	0.16	9	0.56	9	0.56	6	0.56
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.65	3	0.08	5	0.14	5	0.62	11	0.57	4	0.59
Schilhawsky 1960		67	0.46	60	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	53	0.05	68	0.05
Shebanova 2002		14	0.58	22	0.01	28	0.09	25	0.41	38	0.21	30	0.29
Smith 1975		48	0.51	82	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.17	30	0.25	33	0.21
Sokolov 2002		43	0.53	27	0.00	51	0.05	64	0.05	43	0.09	56	0.07
Sztompka 1959		3	0.64	7	0.02	7	0.15	1	0.70	21	0.52	3	0.60
Tomsic 1995		56	0.48	55	0.00	52	0.05	65	0.05	24	0.46	38	0.15
Uninsky 1932		72	0.41	45	0.00	67	0.04	73	0.04	63	0.04	76	0.04
Uninsky 1971		75	0.40	47	0.00	62	0.06	62	0.06	79	0.04	66	0.05
Wasowski 1980		50	0.50	68	0.00	59	0.07	51	0.07	75	0.04	63	0.05
Zak 1937		41	0.54	30	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.25	57	0.06	45	0.12
Zak 1951		37	0.56	33	0.00	36	0.09	35	0.30	51	0.07	40	0.14
Random 1		90	-0.12	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	43	0.10	89	0.03
Random 2		88	0.01	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	36	0.14	69	0.05
Random 3		89	-0.07	54	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	34	0.17	78	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).