Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.66	58	0.00	21	0.15	23	0.49	16	0.48	26	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		21	0.65	12	0.01	26	0.10	24	0.47	14	0.50	25	0.48
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.55	51	0.00	45	0.10	45	0.10	32	0.25	45	0.16
Bacha 2000		66	0.49	81	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	41	0.11	63	0.07
Badura 1965		41	0.57	66	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.19	22	0.41	41	0.28
Barbosa 1983		62	0.50	22	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.11	64	0.07
Biret 1990		56	0.52	45	0.00	52	0.06	54	0.06	52	0.05	74	0.05
Blet 2003		69	0.47	68	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	51	0.06	79	0.04
Block 1995		73	0.46	82	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	61	0.05	80	0.04
Blumental 1952		59	0.51	15	0.00	46	0.07	48	0.07	41	0.13	60	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		8	0.69	13	0.00	10	0.12	13	0.56	14	0.57	13	0.56
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.42	44	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	67	0.05	76	0.04
Bunin 1987		39	0.58	38	0.00	37	0.09	35	0.34	3	0.56	30	0.44
Bunin 1987b		44	0.56	53	0.00	39	0.09	36	0.29	3	0.55	34	0.40
Chiu 1999		74	0.44	77	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.03	83	0.03
Cohen 1997		87	0.29	42	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.04	87	0.03
Cortot 1951		37	0.59	7	0.02	40	0.08	39	0.25	1	0.72	32	0.42
Csalog 1996		86	0.34	54	0.00	80	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.03	85	0.03
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1990		1	0.79	1	0.34	1	0.33	1	0.88	1	0.88	1	0.88
Duchoud 2007		75	0.43	83	0.00	72	0.04	64	0.04	40	0.15	61	0.08
Ezaki 2006		15	0.66	39	0.00	18	0.14	14	0.54	13	0.59	10	0.56
Falvay 1989		81	0.39	74	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Farrell 1958		38	0.59	6	0.03	23	0.11	29	0.42	6	0.59	23	0.50
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.47	60	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	52	0.04	86	0.03
Fliere 1977		7	0.69	75	0.00	15	0.17	17	0.54	20	0.37	28	0.45
Fou 1978		52	0.54	84	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	62	0.05	68	0.06
Francois 1956		45	0.55	69	0.00	61	0.06	55	0.06	26	0.43	47	0.16
Friedman 1923		31	0.61	43	0.00	33	0.10	31	0.39	6	0.59	27	0.48
Friedman 1923b		30	0.61	85	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.44	7	0.60	20	0.51
Friedman 1930		35	0.60	49	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.17	12	0.53	40	0.30
Garcia 2007		53	0.54	34	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	23	0.41	50	0.14
Garcia 2007b		50	0.54	70	0.00	35	0.06	37	0.28	22	0.46	39	0.36
Gierzod 1998		3	0.76	3	0.14	3	0.34	4	0.70	7	0.65	4	0.67
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.60	21	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	24	0.33	44	0.22
Groot 1988		77	0.43	61	0.00	60	0.05	62	0.05	73	0.04	81	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.74	5	0.03	4	0.29	6	0.66	8	0.68	5	0.67
Hatto 1993		19	0.65	23	0.00	14	0.17	10	0.58	7	0.54	14	0.56
Hatto 1997		16	0.66	48	0.00	13	0.13	11	0.57	6	0.55	11	0.56
Horowitz 1949		57	0.51	86	0.00	69	0.04	73	0.04	41	0.23	59	0.10
Indjic 1988		13	0.67	29	0.00	12	0.20	7	0.59	6	0.56	9	0.57
Kapell 1951		26	0.63	19	0.00	11	0.15	19	0.53	9	0.47	24	0.50
Kissin 1993		11	0.68	37	0.00	8	0.14	8	0.59	8	0.65	7	0.62
Kushner 1989		22	0.64	52	0.00	30	0.09	33	0.38	27	0.42	33	0.40
Luisada 1991		51	0.54	78	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	50	0.06	66	0.06
Lushtak 2004		43	0.56	46	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	44	0.10	62	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.69	4	0.06	6	0.26	2	0.70	1	0.78	2	0.74
Magaloff 1978		48	0.55	17	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	31	0.24	55	0.11
Magin 1975		28	0.62	24	0.00	16	0.14	20	0.51	14	0.50	22	0.50
Michalowski 1933		54	0.53	76	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.27	8	0.56	37	0.39
Milkina 1970		17	0.66	9	0.01	22	0.12	18	0.53	18	0.50	19	0.51
Mohovich 1999		63	0.50	87	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	57	0.05	73	0.05
Moravec 1969		60	0.51	50	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	19	0.45	51	0.13
Morozova 2008		36	0.60	32	0.00	32	0.09	34	0.35	12	0.46	35	0.40
Neighaus 1950		12	0.68	18	0.00	20	0.12	15	0.54	11	0.56	15	0.55
Niedzielski 1931		40	0.57	27	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.17	24	0.35	43	0.24
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.61	62	0.00	34	0.11	32	0.39	25	0.39	36	0.39
Osinska 1989		9	0.69	25	0.00	19	0.12	9	0.58	26	0.49	17	0.53
Pachmann 1927		65	0.49	56	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	16	0.42	57	0.11
Paderewski 1930		70	0.47	67	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	17	0.45	49	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.51	30	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	59	0.04	75	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.40	79	0.00	79	0.05	58	0.05	38	0.23	56	0.11
Poblocka 1999		14	0.66	88	0.00	17	0.14	21	0.51	13	0.52	18	0.51
Rabcewiczowa 1932		64	0.50	36	0.00	55	0.04	66	0.04	45	0.08	67	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.63	40	0.00	24	0.13	25	0.46	7	0.55	21	0.50
Rangell 2001		68	0.48	31	0.00	65	0.06	53	0.06	18	0.42	46	0.16
Richter 1976		23	0.64	71	0.00	25	0.16	22	0.49	9	0.60	16	0.54
Rosen 1989		55	0.53	63	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.05	72	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.48	11	0.01	68	0.04	75	0.04	27	0.34	54	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.39	89	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	56	0.06	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.37	80	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	59	0.05	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.42	47	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	40	0.15	65	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.37	57	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.04	88	0.03
Rossi 2007		72	0.46	64	0.00	75	0.03	80	0.03	48	0.07	70	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.56	16	0.00	50	0.06	52	0.06	19	0.39	48	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		76	0.43	26	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.05	82	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.55	14	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	48	0.07	71	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		2	0.76	2	0.27	2	0.35	3	0.70	1	0.73	3	0.71
Shebanova 2002		25	0.63	20	0.00	31	0.12	30	0.40	24	0.36	38	0.38
Smith 1975		47	0.55	35	0.00	53	0.06	56	0.06	34	0.23	53	0.12
Sokolov 2002		58	0.51	59	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	32	0.23	52	0.12
Sztompka 1959		5	0.73	10	0.01	5	0.23	5	0.68	6	0.64	6	0.66
Tomsic 1995		83	0.38	90	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	60	0.06	77	0.04
Uninsky 1932		20	0.65	8	0.01	9	0.14	16	0.54	5	0.59	12	0.56
Uninsky 1971		10	0.68	28	0.00	7	0.19	12	0.57	6	0.63	8	0.60
Wasowski 1980		34	0.60	55	0.00	38	0.09	40	0.23	32	0.29	42	0.26
Zak 1937		27	0.62	41	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.46	21	0.43	29	0.44
Zak 1951		29	0.61	33	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.46	23	0.41	31	0.43
Random 1		88	0.00	72	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	2	0.57	58	0.11
Random 2		89	-0.01	73	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	18	0.32	69	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.09	65	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	54	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).