Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.39	69	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	68	0.04	56	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		33	0.39	12	0.01	31	0.05	36	0.13	87	0.03	45	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		26	0.40	46	0.00	61	0.03	70	0.03	67	0.04	81	0.03
Bacha 2000		3	0.52	32	0.00	7	0.16	1	0.53	33	0.20	4	0.33
Badura 1965		60	0.31	51	0.00	72	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Barbosa 1983		16	0.46	25	0.00	19	0.09	19	0.33	79	0.04	23	0.11
Biret 1990		14	0.48	52	0.00	17	0.06	18	0.34	84	0.03	28	0.10
Blet 2003		27	0.40	2	0.21	2	0.21	5	0.49	24	0.30	2	0.38
Block 1995		83	0.17	80	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	78	0.04	80	0.03
Blumental 1952		1	0.56	4	0.06	3	0.20	11	0.42	53	0.05	12	0.14
Boshniakovich 1969		65	0.30	60	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	82	0.04	58	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.35	53	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	65	0.05	50	0.04
Bunin 1987		81	0.21	79	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.04	82	0.03
Bunin 1987b		82	0.20	84	0.00	82	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04	53	0.04
Chiu 1999		5	0.52	20	0.01	18	0.08	21	0.30	62	0.04	19	0.11
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		62	0.30	44	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	60	0.04
Csalog 1996		50	0.35	31	0.00	10	0.10	13	0.40	42	0.13	6	0.23
Czerny 1949		68	0.29	40	0.00	75	0.04	55	0.04	87	0.02	75	0.03
Czerny 1990		24	0.41	85	0.00	33	0.04	34	0.19	81	0.03	36	0.08
Duchoud 2007		54	0.33	30	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03
Ezaki 2006		20	0.43	54	0.00	39	0.04	42	0.11	65	0.04	37	0.07
Falvay 1989		9	0.50	3	0.10	4	0.17	2	0.52	36	0.25	3	0.36
Farrell 1958		15	0.47	55	0.00	20	0.06	23	0.29	75	0.04	20	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		45	0.36	64	0.00	38	0.05	43	0.10	84	0.03	48	0.05
Fliere 1977		38	0.38	29	0.00	37	0.04	37	0.13	71	0.04	38	0.07
Fou 1978		7	0.51	73	0.00	14	0.13	8	0.45	82	0.03	17	0.12
Francois 1956		37	0.39	36	0.00	29	0.06	27	0.24	74	0.04	29	0.10
Friedman 1923		61	0.30	57	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		64	0.30	70	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	87	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		63	0.30	66	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	86	0.02
Garcia 2007		31	0.39	65	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	69	0.04	57	0.04
Garcia 2007b		19	0.43	7	0.03	15	0.10	10	0.42	59	0.04	15	0.13
Gierzod 1998		43	0.37	33	0.00	36	0.05	40	0.11	64	0.04	41	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.33	41	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	77	0.03	59	0.04
Groot 1988		39	0.38	24	0.00	28	0.05	20	0.30	65	0.04	25	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		34	0.39	21	0.01	52	0.04	58	0.04	84	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1993		13	0.48	16	0.01	11	0.11	14	0.40	66	0.04	14	0.13
Hatto 1997		11	0.49	42	0.00	12	0.10	15	0.40	68	0.04	13	0.13
Horowitz 1949		85	0.17	63	0.00	86	0.03	71	0.03	79	0.03	67	0.03
Indjic 1988		12	0.48	27	0.00	13	0.12	16	0.39	73	0.03	22	0.11
Kapell 1951		57	0.32	13	0.01	50	0.06	47	0.06	71	0.04	47	0.05
Kissin 1993		59	0.31	61	0.00	70	0.04	66	0.04	87	0.02	71	0.03
Kushner 1989		22	0.42	9	0.02	24	0.05	12	0.41	78	0.03	21	0.11
Luisada 1991		17	0.46	10	0.01	23	0.06	24	0.28	73	0.03	30	0.09
Lushtak 2004		6	0.52	48	0.00	8	0.12	6	0.47	61	0.05	10	0.15
Malcuzynski 1961		87	0.14	59	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03	66	0.03
Magaloff 1978		41	0.38	26	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.21	85	0.02	44	0.06
Magin 1975		71	0.27	82	0.00	69	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	51	0.04
Michalowski 1933		84	0.17	37	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.03	85	0.02
Milkina 1970		25	0.41	18	0.01	16	0.11	7	0.46	78	0.04	11	0.14
Mohovich 1999		21	0.43	62	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.26	76	0.04	27	0.10
Moravec 1969		40	0.38	8	0.02	46	0.06	45	0.06	55	0.05	46	0.05
Morozova 2008		51	0.34	76	0.00	66	0.04	60	0.04	84	0.03	73	0.03
Neighaus 1950		58	0.32	38	0.00	71	0.04	64	0.04	86	0.03	83	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		72	0.27	72	0.00	68	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	65	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.40	6	0.03	27	0.07	32	0.20	84	0.03	35	0.08
Osinska 1989		28	0.40	74	0.00	35	0.05	30	0.22	77	0.03	33	0.08
Pachmann 1927		80	0.24	75	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.03
Paderewski 1930		48	0.35	15	0.01	22	0.06	28	0.23	54	0.04	26	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.44	71	0.00	32	0.04	29	0.22	75	0.03	32	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.30	19	0.01	58	0.03	78	0.03	71	0.04	64	0.03
Poblocka 1999		79	0.24	88	0.00	73	0.04	57	0.04	84	0.03	61	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		23	0.42	50	0.00	9	0.10	17	0.38	75	0.04	16	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.33	89	0.00	65	0.03	73	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.03
Rangell 2001		70	0.27	49	0.00	44	0.06	41	0.11	61	0.05	42	0.07
Richter 1976		86	0.14	90	0.00	87	0.03	74	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.03
Rosen 1989		30	0.40	17	0.01	25	0.06	22	0.30	75	0.04	24	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.24	47	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		74	0.26	39	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	43	0.15	31	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		69	0.28	22	0.01	41	0.05	33	0.19	37	0.18	8	0.18
Rosenthal 1931c		73	0.27	23	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.12	42	0.13	18	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.25	56	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	43	0.13	43	0.07
Rossi 2007		10	0.49	14	0.01	21	0.06	25	0.27	41	0.15	7	0.20
Rubinstein 1939		8	0.51	11	0.01	5	0.17	9	0.43	37	0.23	5	0.31
Rubinstein 1952		4	0.52	1	0.27	1	0.27	3	0.52	28	0.36	1	0.43
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.54	5	0.03	6	0.17	4	0.49	59	0.06	9	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		78	0.24	81	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.03	72	0.03
Shebanova 2002		46	0.35	77	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	85	0.03	74	0.03
Smith 1975		42	0.37	78	0.00	34	0.04	35	0.15	86	0.03	39	0.07
Sokolov 2002		53	0.34	67	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	80	0.03	62	0.03
Sztompka 1959		47	0.35	34	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.04	70	0.03
Tomsic 1995		52	0.34	58	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.10	53	0.07	34	0.08
Uninsky 1932		67	0.29	83	0.00	74	0.05	48	0.05	84	0.03	55	0.04
Uninsky 1971		76	0.24	28	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	86	0.03	54	0.04
Wasowski 1980		44	0.36	45	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.05	49	0.04
Zak 1937		35	0.39	43	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	84	0.03	52	0.04
Zak 1951		32	0.39	68	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.12	81	0.04	40	0.07
Random 1		90	-0.08	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	58	0.03	87	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	35	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	43	0.07	76	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.08	86	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	76	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).