Blumental 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		8	0.64	9	0.02	8	0.09	10	0.46	24	0.42	11	0.44
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.53	78	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	70	0.04	79	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.60	33	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	40	0.17	70	0.08
Bacha 2000		24	0.59	34	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.18	2	0.61	21	0.33
Badura 1965		77	0.41	63	0.00	81	0.04	78	0.04	74	0.04	82	0.04
Barbosa 1983		43	0.54	54	0.00	17	0.07	28	0.24	20	0.47	19	0.34
Biret 1990		2	0.67	43	0.00	4	0.17	2	0.63	5	0.60	3	0.61
Blet 2003		65	0.49	37	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	20	0.33	53	0.11
Block 1995		80	0.40	60	0.00	74	0.05	58	0.05	36	0.18	63	0.09
Blumental 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Boshniakovich 1969		70	0.48	30	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	57	0.05	69	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		28	0.58	32	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	6	0.67	36	0.18
Bunin 1987		83	0.34	64	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	60	0.04	88	0.03
Bunin 1987b		86	0.33	83	0.00	85	0.04	80	0.04	74	0.04	77	0.04
Chiu 1999		15	0.61	55	0.00	19	0.06	35	0.17	12	0.38	31	0.25
Cohen 1997		40	0.56	76	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	11	0.42	49	0.14
Cortot 1951		61	0.49	45	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	10	0.57	46	0.15
Csalog 1996		66	0.48	61	0.00	32	0.06	39	0.15	11	0.49	27	0.27
Czerny 1949		56	0.51	27	0.01	39	0.06	41	0.13	48	0.07	57	0.10
Czerny 1990		1	0.69	1	0.27	1	0.26	1	0.71	3	0.73	1	0.72
Duchoud 2007		82	0.36	70	0.00	86	0.03	87	0.03	71	0.04	87	0.03
Ezaki 2006		3	0.67	7	0.03	7	0.09	4	0.55	10	0.61	4	0.58
Falvay 1989		20	0.60	12	0.01	16	0.07	27	0.24	7	0.56	15	0.37
Farrell 1958		34	0.57	84	0.00	50	0.06	47	0.06	32	0.33	48	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.56	6	0.06	12	0.10	24	0.28	6	0.57	13	0.40
Fliere 1977		14	0.61	35	0.00	26	0.08	11	0.41	46	0.07	38	0.17
Fou 1978		5	0.66	39	0.00	13	0.11	9	0.46	15	0.48	8	0.47
Francois 1956		62	0.49	66	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	27	0.42	50	0.14
Friedman 1923		60	0.50	62	0.00	73	0.06	45	0.06	43	0.11	72	0.08
Friedman 1923b		57	0.51	56	0.00	72	0.05	51	0.05	43	0.13	71	0.08
Friedman 1930		52	0.52	58	0.00	71	0.04	59	0.04	40	0.22	61	0.09
Garcia 2007		49	0.52	85	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	35	0.27	62	0.09
Garcia 2007b		58	0.51	77	0.00	64	0.04	79	0.04	37	0.21	64	0.09
Gierzod 1998		35	0.56	26	0.01	24	0.06	23	0.28	41	0.17	34	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		67	0.48	48	0.00	62	0.06	48	0.06	38	0.16	58	0.10
Groot 1988		45	0.54	38	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	23	0.31	39	0.17
Harasiewicz 1955		23	0.59	46	0.00	23	0.06	22	0.29	38	0.18	33	0.23
Hatto 1993		11	0.62	22	0.01	15	0.07	12	0.40	25	0.29	20	0.34
Hatto 1997		10	0.63	67	0.00	29	0.11	17	0.37	33	0.19	28	0.27
Horowitz 1949		78	0.41	65	0.00	80	0.04	74	0.04	43	0.17	67	0.08
Indjic 1988		12	0.62	52	0.00	28	0.07	16	0.37	31	0.26	24	0.31
Kapell 1951		26	0.59	41	0.00	14	0.08	8	0.46	24	0.30	16	0.37
Kissin 1993		42	0.55	44	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.17	44	0.14	44	0.15
Kushner 1989		37	0.56	59	0.00	47	0.04	72	0.04	44	0.10	73	0.06
Luisada 1991		9	0.63	19	0.01	18	0.06	13	0.40	11	0.48	9	0.44
Lushtak 2004		32	0.58	79	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	57	0.05	74	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		75	0.44	13	0.01	38	0.07	31	0.22	23	0.30	30	0.26
Magaloff 1978		18	0.60	28	0.00	21	0.06	33	0.19	10	0.43	25	0.29
Magin 1975		39	0.56	8	0.02	37	0.06	30	0.22	42	0.15	37	0.18
Michalowski 1933		76	0.41	74	0.00	78	0.05	57	0.05	44	0.12	68	0.08
Milkina 1970		13	0.62	4	0.07	10	0.09	7	0.52	27	0.45	7	0.48
Mohovich 1999		21	0.60	25	0.01	11	0.09	18	0.35	20	0.53	12	0.43
Moravec 1969		6	0.66	3	0.11	3	0.25	3	0.59	1	0.76	2	0.67
Morozova 2008		46	0.53	16	0.01	63	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.05	80	0.04
Neighaus 1950		74	0.44	75	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.04	83	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		53	0.51	31	0.00	20	0.06	25	0.25	15	0.46	18	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		73	0.44	71	0.00	75	0.04	81	0.04	58	0.05	78	0.04
Osinska 1989		27	0.58	24	0.01	33	0.07	21	0.29	32	0.26	26	0.27
Pachmann 1927		81	0.36	86	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	64	0.03	85	0.03
Paderewski 1930		72	0.46	68	0.00	69	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.45	43	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.51	72	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	35	0.20	55	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		84	0.34	87	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	64	0.05	76	0.04
Poblocka 1999		55	0.51	5	0.07	9	0.11	20	0.34	34	0.33	22	0.33
Rabcewiczowa 1932		4	0.67	2	0.13	2	0.19	5	0.52	5	0.53	6	0.52
Rachmaninoff 1923		7	0.64	10	0.02	6	0.11	6	0.52	4	0.57	5	0.54
Rangell 2001		85	0.34	73	0.00	82	0.05	55	0.05	56	0.05	75	0.05
Richter 1976		87	0.30	29	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.04	84	0.03
Rosen 1989		36	0.56	20	0.01	25	0.07	19	0.34	16	0.40	17	0.37
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.48	18	0.01	51	0.04	75	0.04	8	0.64	41	0.16
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.47	69	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	8	0.60	45	0.15
Rosenthal 1931b		64	0.49	42	0.00	56	0.04	77	0.04	6	0.65	42	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		47	0.53	17	0.01	30	0.06	38	0.16	7	0.64	23	0.32
Rosenthal 1931d		63	0.49	50	0.00	57	0.06	46	0.06	6	0.69	35	0.20
Rossi 2007		33	0.57	88	0.00	52	0.04	70	0.04	7	0.52	47	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		31	0.58	57	0.00	45	0.04	67	0.04	26	0.34	51	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		22	0.59	49	0.00	5	0.12	14	0.39	24	0.41	14	0.40
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.59	80	0.00	48	0.04	69	0.04	38	0.23	56	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.52	21	0.01	46	0.04	64	0.04	38	0.19	60	0.09
Shebanova 2002		44	0.54	11	0.02	31	0.05	29	0.23	56	0.05	54	0.11
Smith 1975		30	0.58	23	0.01	22	0.07	15	0.37	8	0.53	10	0.44
Sokolov 2002		50	0.52	36	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	37	0.16	65	0.08
Sztompka 1959		41	0.56	14	0.01	27	0.06	26	0.24	39	0.22	32	0.23
Tomsic 1995		79	0.40	81	0.00	77	0.04	76	0.04	38	0.17	66	0.08
Uninsky 1932		59	0.50	40	0.00	65	0.03	83	0.03	46	0.06	81	0.04
Uninsky 1971		69	0.48	47	0.00	42	0.05	37	0.16	40	0.17	40	0.16
Wasowski 1980		29	0.58	15	0.01	35	0.07	32	0.21	28	0.32	29	0.26
Zak 1937		16	0.61	53	0.00	41	0.07	42	0.13	44	0.09	52	0.11
Zak 1951		17	0.60	51	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.13	52	0.06	59	0.09
Random 1		90	-0.14	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.02	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	57	0.04	86	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.11	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	59	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).