Blet 2003

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.57	59	0.00	11	0.09	13	0.41	55	0.05	16	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.51	76	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.05	56	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.43	47	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	86	0.03	66	0.04
Bacha 2000		52	0.46	43	0.00	22	0.07	28	0.27	43	0.10	12	0.16
Badura 1965		38	0.50	19	0.01	49	0.05	56	0.05	44	0.09	45	0.07
Barbosa 1983		42	0.49	22	0.01	40	0.06	40	0.14	67	0.04	44	0.07
Biret 1990		16	0.53	5	0.07	4	0.19	7	0.48	44	0.09	7	0.21
Blet 2003		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Block 1995		59	0.44	11	0.02	12	0.09	33	0.19	56	0.05	34	0.10
Blumental 1952		44	0.49	45	0.00	20	0.08	20	0.33	61	0.04	31	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.58	9	0.02	7	0.11	4	0.52	47	0.08	9	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.47	58	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	53	0.06	52	0.05
Bunin 1987		83	0.35	77	0.00	86	0.04	65	0.04	48	0.05	67	0.04
Bunin 1987b		82	0.35	52	0.00	85	0.03	72	0.03	66	0.04	77	0.03
Chiu 1999		70	0.41	70	0.00	68	0.03	69	0.03	71	0.04	73	0.03
Cohen 1997		76	0.40	3	0.07	5	0.10	24	0.30	5	0.49	3	0.38
Cortot 1951		75	0.40	71	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	62	0.05	69	0.04
Csalog 1996		36	0.50	2	0.08	6	0.13	8	0.45	20	0.38	2	0.41
Czerny 1949		48	0.47	66	0.00	61	0.06	51	0.06	81	0.03	64	0.04
Czerny 1990		22	0.52	78	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.15	78	0.04	41	0.08
Duchoud 2007		86	0.33	68	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	63	0.05	65	0.04
Ezaki 2006		13	0.54	15	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.09	64	0.04	47	0.06
Falvay 1989		58	0.44	85	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	63	0.05	75	0.03
Farrell 1958		81	0.37	89	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	79	0.04	76	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		35	0.51	37	0.00	18	0.09	32	0.20	34	0.27	6	0.23
Fliere 1977		1	0.64	1	0.35	1	0.34	1	0.67	52	0.06	8	0.20
Fou 1978		3	0.58	7	0.02	3	0.18	3	0.56	44	0.11	5	0.25
Francois 1956		45	0.48	74	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	66	0.04	59	0.05
Friedman 1923		63	0.43	34	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		61	0.43	48	0.00	65	0.03	68	0.03	70	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1930		74	0.41	57	0.00	82	0.03	71	0.03	74	0.04	81	0.03
Garcia 2007		46	0.48	79	0.00	54	0.08	45	0.08	64	0.04	51	0.06
Garcia 2007b		56	0.45	72	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.04	60	0.05
Gierzod 1998		5	0.57	65	0.00	15	0.09	12	0.42	59	0.04	21	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		32	0.51	40	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	68	0.03	68	0.04
Groot 1988		43	0.49	24	0.01	27	0.06	19	0.34	47	0.06	17	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.55	20	0.01	37	0.06	37	0.17	80	0.03	46	0.07
Hatto 1993		37	0.50	28	0.00	13	0.08	10	0.44	63	0.04	23	0.13
Hatto 1997		29	0.51	73	0.00	14	0.14	11	0.43	65	0.04	20	0.13
Horowitz 1949		67	0.42	26	0.01	69	0.03	80	0.03	64	0.05	63	0.04
Indjic 1988		26	0.51	16	0.01	8	0.10	9	0.44	54	0.05	14	0.15
Kapell 1951		28	0.51	18	0.01	26	0.06	27	0.28	74	0.04	29	0.11
Kissin 1993		11	0.55	55	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.22	66	0.04	37	0.09
Kushner 1989		10	0.55	49	0.00	32	0.06	26	0.29	65	0.04	28	0.11
Luisada 1991		2	0.63	4	0.07	2	0.29	2	0.64	18	0.37	1	0.49
Lushtak 2004		18	0.53	56	0.00	23	0.07	18	0.35	53	0.05	22	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		79	0.38	25	0.01	83	0.03	66	0.03	68	0.04	78	0.03
Magaloff 1978		66	0.42	86	0.00	76	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.02
Magin 1975		24	0.52	30	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	74	0.03	53	0.05
Michalowski 1933		50	0.47	14	0.01	56	0.06	52	0.06	38	0.21	30	0.11
Milkina 1970		7	0.56	23	0.01	10	0.08	6	0.49	60	0.05	13	0.16
Mohovich 1999		14	0.53	10	0.02	9	0.09	5	0.49	49	0.08	10	0.20
Moravec 1969		68	0.42	90	0.00	79	0.02	84	0.02	69	0.04	71	0.03
Morozova 2008		40	0.50	42	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	65	0.04	57	0.05
Neighaus 1950		25	0.51	46	0.00	17	0.08	14	0.40	54	0.05	18	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		33	0.51	21	0.01	28	0.05	36	0.17	57	0.05	35	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.46	27	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.11	62	0.05	43	0.07
Osinska 1989		15	0.53	61	0.00	30	0.05	21	0.32	67	0.04	27	0.11
Pachmann 1927		87	0.31	87	0.00	87	0.03	67	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03
Paderewski 1930		73	0.41	81	0.00	67	0.03	73	0.03	64	0.04	79	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		17	0.53	17	0.01	19	0.08	16	0.39	33	0.21	4	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008		84	0.35	50	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.05	61	0.04
Poblocka 1999		19	0.52	63	0.00	29	0.05	22	0.31	62	0.05	25	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.44	67	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.19	59	0.05	32	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		65	0.42	80	0.00	81	0.03	70	0.03	78	0.04	74	0.03
Rangell 2001		85	0.33	29	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	71	0.04	85	0.03
Richter 1976		51	0.47	6	0.03	45	0.05	57	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05
Rosen 1989		12	0.54	64	0.00	24	0.07	17	0.36	51	0.06	15	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.42	38	0.00	74	0.02	87	0.02	58	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.38	31	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	45	0.08	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.39	53	0.00	78	0.02	83	0.02	61	0.05	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		72	0.41	60	0.00	75	0.02	82	0.02	50	0.06	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.38	33	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.19	38	0.09
Rossi 2007		71	0.41	54	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.04	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.45	44	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	81	0.03	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		55	0.45	75	0.00	50	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.04	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.50	82	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.18	46	0.08	26	0.12
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.51	12	0.02	43	0.05	43	0.10	63	0.04	49	0.06
Shebanova 2002		47	0.48	51	0.00	52	0.05	58	0.05	46	0.07	50	0.06
Smith 1975		23	0.52	32	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.11	72	0.04	42	0.07
Sokolov 2002		64	0.43	35	0.00	25	0.05	39	0.15	65	0.04	39	0.08
Sztompka 1959		31	0.51	8	0.02	21	0.07	25	0.30	55	0.06	19	0.13
Tomsic 1995		57	0.45	62	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	52	0.07	48	0.06
Uninsky 1932		41	0.50	83	0.00	58	0.07	46	0.07	80	0.03	58	0.05
Uninsky 1971		8	0.55	13	0.01	16	0.09	15	0.39	50	0.07	11	0.17
Wasowski 1980		20	0.52	36	0.00	31	0.06	23	0.30	60	0.05	24	0.12
Zak 1937		21	0.52	41	0.00	35	0.07	29	0.22	78	0.04	36	0.09
Zak 1951		34	0.51	39	0.00	36	0.08	31	0.20	69	0.05	33	0.10
Random 1		88	-0.05	84	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	21	0.29	40	0.08
Random 2		90	-0.13	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.08	69	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	66	0.04	83	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).