Biret 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.64	63	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.38	26	0.42	22	0.40
Anderszewski 2003		15	0.62	59	0.00	25	0.10	21	0.39	17	0.49	16	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981		28	0.59	19	0.01	42	0.06	41	0.12	29	0.26	43	0.18
Bacha 2000		44	0.56	39	0.00	63	0.05	57	0.05	23	0.32	57	0.13
Badura 1965		75	0.47	7	0.02	78	0.03	86	0.03	45	0.09	78	0.05
Barbosa 1983		50	0.54	23	0.00	17	0.08	28	0.28	17	0.52	23	0.38
Biret 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blet 2003		52	0.53	79	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	7	0.48	38	0.21
Block 1995		58	0.51	18	0.01	46	0.05	50	0.05	19	0.37	54	0.14
Blumental 1952		6	0.67	54	0.00	9	0.20	5	0.60	2	0.63	6	0.61
Boshniakovich 1969		42	0.57	38	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.28	32	0.32	32	0.30
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.58	69	0.00	58	0.06	48	0.06	14	0.54	40	0.18
Bunin 1987		86	0.34	80	0.00	86	0.04	75	0.04	46	0.05	85	0.04
Bunin 1987b		87	0.32	83	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	53	0.05	82	0.04
Chiu 1999		33	0.58	36	0.00	59	0.06	45	0.06	22	0.28	58	0.13
Cohen 1997		71	0.48	84	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	18	0.34	67	0.10
Cortot 1951		59	0.51	44	0.00	68	0.04	59	0.04	18	0.48	56	0.14
Csalog 1996		63	0.50	46	0.00	50	0.04	72	0.04	21	0.37	62	0.12
Czerny 1949		54	0.52	60	0.00	61	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.06	77	0.05
Czerny 1990		14	0.63	61	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.46	23	0.43	17	0.44
Duchoud 2007		83	0.41	89	0.00	83	0.04	71	0.04	54	0.05	84	0.04
Ezaki 2006		10	0.65	16	0.01	15	0.10	18	0.41	18	0.50	14	0.45
Falvay 1989		29	0.59	22	0.01	57	0.04	63	0.04	21	0.46	52	0.14
Farrell 1958		17	0.62	53	0.00	13	0.14	14	0.46	8	0.57	10	0.51
Ferenczy 1958		80	0.46	75	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	46	0.07	76	0.05
Fliere 1977		12	0.65	4	0.05	7	0.16	9	0.52	21	0.36	19	0.43
Fou 1978		3	0.68	6	0.02	8	0.14	7	0.57	3	0.61	8	0.59
Francois 1956		49	0.54	43	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.18	8	0.59	28	0.33
Friedman 1923		73	0.48	64	0.00	82	0.06	47	0.06	64	0.05	79	0.05
Friedman 1923b		77	0.47	81	0.00	81	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.05	86	0.04
Friedman 1930		60	0.50	37	0.00	70	0.04	60	0.04	43	0.18	71	0.08
Garcia 2007		48	0.54	21	0.01	45	0.05	53	0.05	12	0.51	47	0.16
Garcia 2007b		45	0.56	48	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.23	20	0.47	29	0.33
Gierzod 1998		18	0.62	47	0.00	21	0.12	15	0.44	37	0.22	30	0.31
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.53	85	0.00	55	0.03	80	0.03	28	0.31	68	0.10
Groot 1988		23	0.60	20	0.01	16	0.08	20	0.40	4	0.49	18	0.44
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.61	65	0.00	22	0.12	10	0.50	27	0.45	12	0.47
Hatto 1993		38	0.57	40	0.00	33	0.07	31	0.24	37	0.20	36	0.22
Hatto 1997		34	0.58	57	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.22	40	0.14	42	0.18
Horowitz 1949		72	0.48	73	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	40	0.24	69	0.08
Indjic 1988		30	0.58	31	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.24	38	0.19	37	0.21
Kapell 1951		35	0.58	28	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.29	35	0.22	33	0.25
Kissin 1993		40	0.57	82	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	50	0.06	74	0.05
Kushner 1989		4	0.68	13	0.01	3	0.21	3	0.64	4	0.65	3	0.64
Luisada 1991		31	0.58	14	0.01	39	0.05	38	0.19	33	0.22	39	0.20
Lushtak 2004		25	0.60	25	0.00	19	0.10	17	0.43	11	0.53	11	0.48
Malcuzynski 1961		64	0.50	58	0.00	30	0.05	42	0.11	24	0.28	41	0.18
Magaloff 1978		21	0.61	33	0.00	35	0.05	34	0.22	14	0.42	31	0.30
Magin 1975		57	0.51	49	0.00	52	0.04	76	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.04
Michalowski 1933		82	0.43	45	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	36	0.22	70	0.08
Milkina 1970		1	0.70	2	0.24	2	0.34	1	0.71	3	0.69	1	0.70
Mohovich 1999		8	0.66	10	0.01	10	0.19	8	0.56	4	0.66	7	0.61
Moravec 1969		47	0.55	70	0.00	56	0.04	78	0.04	17	0.49	50	0.14
Morozova 2008		51	0.53	29	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.11	37	0.23	46	0.16
Neighaus 1950		55	0.52	42	0.00	66	0.04	74	0.04	56	0.05	87	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		74	0.48	56	0.00	62	0.06	46	0.06	37	0.18	66	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		41	0.57	8	0.01	27	0.07	36	0.20	41	0.13	45	0.16
Osinska 1989		2	0.68	1	0.34	1	0.33	2	0.65	12	0.60	5	0.62
Pachmann 1927		84	0.40	67	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	60	0.04	88	0.03
Paderewski 1930		68	0.48	51	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	13	0.49	53	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		24	0.60	74	0.00	29	0.08	25	0.33	5	0.58	15	0.44
Pierdomenico 2008		81	0.45	86	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	8	0.51	44	0.16
Poblocka 1999		61	0.50	78	0.00	49	0.04	65	0.04	58	0.05	80	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		11	0.65	5	0.05	6	0.14	11	0.49	4	0.56	9	0.52
Rachmaninoff 1923		19	0.62	11	0.01	14	0.08	23	0.35	17	0.37	24	0.36
Rangell 2001		62	0.50	50	0.00	65	0.04	66	0.04	14	0.46	55	0.14
Richter 1976		85	0.39	68	0.00	84	0.05	49	0.05	70	0.04	83	0.04
Rosen 1989		37	0.57	66	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.19	34	0.26	35	0.22
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.50	32	0.00	71	0.05	56	0.05	17	0.51	48	0.16
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.46	17	0.01	76	0.03	87	0.03	20	0.42	65	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.50	15	0.01	72	0.05	55	0.05	13	0.54	49	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.46	76	0.00	77	0.04	70	0.04	28	0.37	64	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		69	0.48	87	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	10	0.60	60	0.13
Rossi 2007		46	0.55	30	0.00	51	0.04	77	0.04	8	0.52	51	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.58	88	0.00	47	0.04	64	0.04	21	0.37	61	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		43	0.56	71	0.00	38	0.05	32	0.23	16	0.48	27	0.33
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.65	55	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.41	15	0.51	13	0.46
Schilhawsky 1960		66	0.50	24	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	52	0.05	75	0.05
Shebanova 2002		16	0.62	27	0.00	20	0.10	16	0.43	34	0.26	26	0.33
Smith 1975		39	0.57	26	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.25	11	0.43	25	0.33
Sokolov 2002		26	0.60	41	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.14	15	0.42	34	0.24
Sztompka 1959		20	0.61	9	0.01	11	0.12	13	0.46	33	0.37	20	0.41
Tomsic 1995		76	0.47	77	0.00	69	0.04	58	0.04	25	0.43	59	0.13
Uninsky 1932		56	0.52	35	0.00	54	0.04	68	0.04	34	0.34	63	0.12
Uninsky 1971		70	0.48	34	0.00	53	0.04	73	0.04	46	0.08	72	0.06
Wasowski 1980		27	0.60	52	0.00	24	0.13	24	0.35	18	0.45	21	0.40
Zak 1937		5	0.67	12	0.01	5	0.17	6	0.60	4	0.67	4	0.63
Zak 1951		7	0.67	3	0.06	4	0.23	4	0.63	3	0.67	2	0.65
Random 1		90	-0.12	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	66	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.02	62	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	33	0.19	73	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.07	72	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	55	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).