Bacha 2000

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.51	28	0.00	29	0.05	26	0.26	52	0.05	35	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		7	0.56	12	0.01	8	0.10	9	0.43	50	0.05	22	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.58	6	0.04	5	0.12	7	0.43	42	0.14	10	0.25
Bacha 2000		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Badura 1965		56	0.44	69	0.00	69	0.03	74	0.03	63	0.05	73	0.04
Barbosa 1983		36	0.48	49	0.00	19	0.06	21	0.34	36	0.19	9	0.25
Biret 1990		9	0.56	36	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.32	57	0.05	27	0.13
Blet 2003		49	0.46	34	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	28	0.27	19	0.16
Block 1995		68	0.40	62	0.00	53	0.04	65	0.04	77	0.04	74	0.04
Blumental 1952		3	0.59	3	0.14	3	0.23	2	0.61	34	0.18	6	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		61	0.42	53	0.00	68	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.04	85	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		23	0.52	11	0.01	49	0.05	52	0.05	44	0.17	39	0.09
Bunin 1987		84	0.35	65	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.04	86	0.03
Bunin 1987b		85	0.34	33	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.05	64	0.04
Chiu 1999		14	0.53	30	0.00	33	0.06	29	0.23	33	0.17	15	0.20
Cohen 1997		21	0.52	42	0.00	22	0.07	33	0.20	1	0.53	7	0.33
Cortot 1951		52	0.45	37	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.22	38	0.10
Csalog 1996		70	0.40	8	0.02	30	0.05	42	0.10	47	0.06	43	0.08
Czerny 1949		33	0.49	74	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.11	67	0.04	50	0.07
Czerny 1990		20	0.52	16	0.01	12	0.08	10	0.42	60	0.05	26	0.14
Duchoud 2007		39	0.48	20	0.01	37	0.05	37	0.15	22	0.31	12	0.22
Ezaki 2006		1	0.60	5	0.05	4	0.18	3	0.58	35	0.22	2	0.36
Falvay 1989		40	0.48	50	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.06	55	0.05
Farrell 1958		8	0.56	1	0.23	1	0.23	4	0.52	34	0.32	1	0.41
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.42	15	0.01	51	0.04	67	0.04	44	0.11	49	0.07
Fliere 1977		15	0.53	4	0.05	7	0.11	6	0.49	68	0.04	23	0.14
Fou 1978		6	0.57	59	0.00	13	0.08	11	0.42	59	0.05	24	0.14
Francois 1956		41	0.48	23	0.01	18	0.06	28	0.23	37	0.21	13	0.22
Friedman 1923		42	0.47	58	0.00	60	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.06	60	0.05
Friedman 1923b		44	0.47	67	0.00	58	0.04	68	0.04	53	0.06	57	0.05
Friedman 1930		64	0.41	90	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	67	0.04	83	0.03
Garcia 2007		63	0.42	46	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	58	0.05	72	0.04
Garcia 2007b		51	0.45	76	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.04
Gierzod 1998		43	0.47	29	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.18	76	0.03	51	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.45	77	0.00	50	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.03	87	0.03
Groot 1988		25	0.52	17	0.01	16	0.06	20	0.35	56	0.05	28	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		38	0.48	55	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	81	0.03	88	0.03
Hatto 1993		18	0.53	18	0.01	10	0.09	16	0.36	74	0.04	31	0.12
Hatto 1997		17	0.53	21	0.01	11	0.10	22	0.33	71	0.04	34	0.11
Horowitz 1949		80	0.37	81	0.00	84	0.03	87	0.03	65	0.05	66	0.04
Indjic 1988		19	0.53	88	0.00	15	0.07	25	0.29	67	0.04	33	0.11
Kapell 1951		50	0.46	25	0.00	24	0.07	14	0.37	56	0.05	25	0.14
Kissin 1993		76	0.39	38	0.00	74	0.03	84	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Kushner 1989		24	0.52	45	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.24	64	0.05	32	0.11
Luisada 1991		31	0.50	19	0.01	25	0.08	18	0.36	43	0.13	11	0.22
Lushtak 2004		45	0.47	66	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.12	72	0.04	52	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		65	0.41	31	0.00	67	0.04	61	0.04	76	0.03	79	0.03
Magaloff 1978		13	0.53	9	0.02	28	0.05	31	0.22	39	0.15	17	0.18
Magin 1975		69	0.40	89	0.00	63	0.05	46	0.05	65	0.04	63	0.04
Michalowski 1933		86	0.33	70	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03
Milkina 1970		2	0.59	2	0.21	2	0.25	1	0.63	42	0.20	5	0.35
Mohovich 1999		27	0.51	35	0.00	23	0.07	17	0.36	46	0.09	18	0.18
Moravec 1969		53	0.45	54	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	35	0.21	36	0.10
Morozova 2008		54	0.45	78	0.00	46	0.05	45	0.05	63	0.04	69	0.04
Neighaus 1950		29	0.50	79	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.06	59	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		57	0.43	75	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	64	0.04	62	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.54	43	0.00	21	0.06	8	0.43	50	0.05	21	0.15
Osinska 1989		30	0.50	51	0.00	34	0.05	30	0.22	56	0.07	29	0.12
Pachmann 1927		83	0.35	82	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	69	0.03	80	0.03
Paderewski 1930		62	0.42	7	0.02	66	0.04	57	0.04	57	0.04	68	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		73	0.40	60	0.00	75	0.03	72	0.03	68	0.04	78	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.40	63	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	48	0.06	61	0.04
Poblocka 1999		81	0.36	52	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		37	0.48	41	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.21	56	0.05	37	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.51	27	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.15	80	0.04	42	0.08
Rangell 2001		74	0.39	56	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.05	58	0.05
Richter 1976		87	0.27	84	0.00	87	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.04
Rosen 1989		16	0.53	10	0.02	9	0.13	13	0.41	44	0.10	16	0.20
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.36	72	0.00	83	0.03	73	0.03	50	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.38	32	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	40	0.18	48	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.40	26	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	30	0.27	40	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		66	0.40	22	0.01	72	0.04	63	0.04	38	0.21	41	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.38	68	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	33	0.24	45	0.08
Rossi 2007		10	0.55	40	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.13	22	0.35	14	0.21
Rubinstein 1939		12	0.54	39	0.00	14	0.07	12	0.41	30	0.32	3	0.36
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.47	85	0.00	17	0.06	15	0.36	38	0.20	8	0.27
Rubinstein 1966		5	0.57	13	0.01	6	0.15	5	0.49	35	0.27	4	0.36
Schilhawsky 1960		79	0.37	44	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.03	82	0.03
Shebanova 2002		35	0.48	83	0.00	40	0.05	35	0.17	70	0.04	44	0.08
Smith 1975		32	0.50	86	0.00	20	0.06	19	0.36	48	0.06	20	0.15
Sokolov 2002		34	0.48	24	0.01	39	0.05	38	0.13	66	0.04	46	0.07
Sztompka 1959		22	0.52	87	0.00	32	0.05	24	0.31	64	0.05	30	0.12
Tomsic 1995		71	0.40	47	0.00	70	0.03	79	0.03	40	0.14	53	0.06
Uninsky 1932		58	0.43	71	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.04
Uninsky 1971		75	0.39	14	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	63	0.05	47	0.07
Wasowski 1980		59	0.42	61	0.00	64	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Zak 1937		46	0.47	80	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	66	0.05	56	0.05
Zak 1951		48	0.46	48	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	70	0.05	65	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.20	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	74	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.05	64	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	39	0.10	71	0.04
Random 3		88	-0.05	57	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	44	0.10	75	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).