Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		23	0.68	50	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.35	38	0.08	27	0.17
Ax 1995		13	0.73	42	0.00	14	0.21	14	0.54	37	0.10	23	0.23
Bacha 1998		39	0.63	26	0.00	42	0.06	54	0.06	22	0.38	29	0.15
Barbosa 1983		49	0.61	21	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.25	45	0.07	34	0.13
BenOr 1989		26	0.67	5	0.03	17	0.14	21	0.41	20	0.48	15	0.44
Biret 1990		20	0.70	47	0.00	16	0.14	18	0.48	22	0.58	7	0.53
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.67	12	0.01	25	0.11	23	0.33	20	0.35	18	0.34
Chiu 1999		59	0.51	60	0.00	61	0.07	41	0.07	40	0.06	47	0.06
Clidat 1994		31	0.65	54	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.17	36	0.10	35	0.13
Cohen 1997		63	0.41	64	0.00	63	0.05	63	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.05
Cortot 1951		64	0.39	44	0.00	64	0.06	56	0.06	39	0.06	57	0.06
Csalog 1996		44	0.62	63	0.00	47	0.07	43	0.07	43	0.06	51	0.06
Czerny 1989		32	0.64	17	0.00	43	0.06	51	0.06	46	0.05	58	0.05
Ezaki 2006		11	0.74	19	0.00	13	0.20	16	0.51	21	0.43	13	0.47
Falvay 1989		16	0.72	15	0.01	20	0.15	15	0.52	41	0.06	25	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		29	0.66	40	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.07	52	0.06	56	0.06
Fliere 1977		27	0.66	34	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.25	31	0.23	21	0.24
Fou 1978		35	0.64	46	0.00	35	0.06	46	0.06	43	0.07	48	0.06
Francois 1956		62	0.49	32	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.05	63	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		57	0.54	35	0.00	56	0.04	64	0.04	21	0.36	37	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.49	28	0.00	38	0.06	47	0.06	31	0.18	39	0.10
Groot 1988		45	0.62	9	0.01	46	0.05	58	0.05	51	0.06	62	0.05
Hatto 1993		7	0.76	22	0.00	8	0.24	5	0.72	23	0.39	8	0.53
Hatto 1997		3	0.78	4	0.04	4	0.25	4	0.75	18	0.45	5	0.58
Horszowski 1983		52	0.57	57	0.00	59	0.07	44	0.07	22	0.25	33	0.13
Indjic 2001		4	0.78	13	0.01	3	0.15	3	0.76	19	0.43	6	0.57
Katin 1996		47	0.62	39	0.00	45	0.05	59	0.05	40	0.10	44	0.07
Kiepura 1999		40	0.62	30	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.18	15	0.44	20	0.28
Korecka 1992		21	0.69	41	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.32	2	0.74	12	0.49
Kushner 1990		42	0.62	49	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	32	0.22	38	0.12
Lilamand 2001		51	0.58	55	0.00	57	0.06	50	0.06	45	0.06	52	0.06
Luisada 1990		46	0.62	27	0.00	48	0.06	55	0.06	35	0.10	43	0.08
Luisada 2008		50	0.60	59	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	41	0.07	53	0.06
Lushtak 2004		24	0.68	20	0.00	22	0.10	25	0.29	46	0.07	32	0.14
Malcuzynski 1951		8	0.76	6	0.02	9	0.22	7	0.70	21	0.39	9	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		10	0.74	16	0.01	7	0.19	9	0.65	18	0.40	10	0.51
Magaloff 1977		58	0.54	45	0.00	55	0.05	61	0.05	53	0.06	60	0.05
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Meguri 1997		56	0.55	62	0.00	53	0.06	57	0.06	52	0.05	59	0.05
Milkina 1970		30	0.65	37	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.07	44	0.09	41	0.08
Mohovich 1999		18	0.71	36	0.00	21	0.11	20	0.44	27	0.27	19	0.34
Nezu 2005		12	0.73	31	0.00	12	0.14	11	0.61	26	0.30	16	0.43
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.66	38	0.00	40	0.07	38	0.07	56	0.05	50	0.06
Olejniczak 1990		2	0.79	2	0.06	2	0.39	2	0.79	2	0.74	1	0.76
Osinska 1989		5	0.77	11	0.01	10	0.19	10	0.64	24	0.38	11	0.49
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.56	56	0.00	58	0.07	45	0.07	14	0.28	31	0.14
Poblocka 1999		6	0.77	10	0.01	6	0.18	6	0.71	15	0.60	2	0.65
Rangell 2001		22	0.68	18	0.00	28	0.08	31	0.16	24	0.36	22	0.24
Richter 1960		54	0.56	52	0.00	54	0.05	62	0.05	57	0.04	64	0.04
Richter 1961		55	0.55	51	0.00	51	0.07	42	0.07	53	0.05	46	0.06
Rosen 1989		43	0.62	29	0.00	49	0.07	40	0.07	38	0.07	45	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		37	0.63	14	0.01	32	0.06	32	0.13	47	0.06	40	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.64	43	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.19	35	0.09	36	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.64	23	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.08	38	0.08	42	0.08
Rudanovskaya 2007		60	0.51	61	0.00	62	0.06	53	0.06	45	0.06	55	0.06
Shebanova 2002		41	0.62	58	0.00	41	0.05	60	0.05	39	0.07	54	0.06
Smith 1975		36	0.64	48	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.12	30	0.20	28	0.15
Sztompka 1959		15	0.72	3	0.05	5	0.15	12	0.58	4	0.61	3	0.59
Tanyel 1992		9	0.76	7	0.02	11	0.23	8	0.66	19	0.53	4	0.59
Tsujii 2005		14	0.72	53	0.00	19	0.13	17	0.48	59	0.05	30	0.15
Uninsky 1959		19	0.71	24	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.47	43	0.08	24	0.19
Vardi 1988		48	0.62	33	0.00	50	0.06	52	0.06	54	0.06	49	0.06
Wasowski 1980		38	0.63	25	0.00	44	0.08	35	0.08	22	0.35	26	0.17
Zimerman 1975		17	0.71	8	0.02	15	0.16	13	0.55	29	0.29	17	0.40
Average		1	0.83	1	0.64	1	0.64	1	0.88	32	0.24	14	0.46
Random 1		66	-0.09	66	0.00	65	0.02	66	0.02	63	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.06	65	0.00	66	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		67	-0.11	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).