Katin 1996

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   21  0.7224  0.0025  0.1025  0.3533  0.1828  0.25
Ax 1995   5  0.7823  0.007  0.204  0.7610  0.605  0.68
Bacha 1998   52  0.5861  0.0056  0.0655  0.0638  0.0656  0.06
Barbosa 1983   32  0.6734  0.0015  0.1618  0.498  0.5415  0.51
BenOr 1989   49  0.6035  0.0045  0.0942  0.0946  0.0748  0.08
Biret 1990   23  0.708  0.0216  0.1917  0.5114  0.6611  0.58
Brailowsky 1960   45  0.6216  0.0046  0.0652  0.0640  0.0850  0.07
Chiu 1999   44  0.6450  0.0044  0.0746  0.0723  0.4433  0.18
Clidat 1994   33  0.6745  0.0028  0.0727  0.2340  0.0839  0.14
Cohen 1997   62  0.5063  0.0061  0.0560  0.0525  0.2742  0.12
Cortot 1951   64  0.3264  0.0064  0.0556  0.0555  0.0466  0.04
Csalog 1996   29  0.6815  0.0031  0.0733  0.1419  0.3729  0.23
Czerny 1989   24  0.6957  0.0034  0.1038  0.1022  0.3434  0.18
Ezaki 2006   17  0.7340  0.0023  0.1023  0.3722  0.4019  0.38
Falvay 1989   18  0.7314  0.0017  0.1515  0.6233  0.1325  0.28
Fiorentino 1962   9  0.7517  0.0011  0.1912  0.6510  0.618  0.63
Fliere 1977   31  0.6833  0.0038  0.0844  0.0847  0.0649  0.07
Fou 1978   11  0.7410  0.018  0.1814  0.648  0.637  0.63
Francois 1956   42  0.6551  0.0040  0.0845  0.0817  0.4035  0.18
Goldenweiser 1946   63  0.4353  0.0063  0.0651  0.0649  0.0561  0.05
Gornostaeva 1994   59  0.5432  0.0047  0.0747  0.0726  0.2440  0.13
Groot 1988   25  0.6930  0.0030  0.0729  0.1915  0.3627  0.26
Hatto 1993   14  0.7311  0.0113  0.1811  0.6621  0.4114  0.52
Hatto 1997   13  0.7339  0.0014  0.2213  0.6522  0.4213  0.52
Horszowski 1983   61  0.5244  0.0062  0.0561  0.0551  0.0560  0.05
Indjic 2001   12  0.7322  0.0012  0.1710  0.6621  0.4212  0.53
Katin 1996   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Kiepura 1999   38  0.6627  0.0033  0.0931  0.187  0.6122  0.33
Korecka 1992   60  0.5255  0.0060  0.0464  0.0453  0.0565  0.04
Kushner 1990   36  0.669  0.0121  0.1021  0.395  0.6317  0.50
Lilamand 2001   57  0.5625  0.0057  0.0559  0.0533  0.1153  0.07
Luisada 1990   34  0.6626  0.0039  0.1041  0.1018  0.4632  0.21
Luisada 2008   40  0.6519  0.0042  0.1039  0.1017  0.5430  0.23
Lushtak 2004   37  0.6628  0.0027  0.0732  0.1536  0.0941  0.12
Malcuzynski 1951   27  0.6937  0.0032  0.0830  0.1948  0.0643  0.11
Malcuzynski 1961   41  0.6562  0.0035  0.1137  0.1148  0.0552  0.07
Magaloff 1977   51  0.5852  0.0049  0.0563  0.0530  0.2044  0.10
Magin 1975   47  0.6260  0.0052  0.1040  0.1059  0.0551  0.07
Meguri 1997   56  0.5665  0.0050  0.0562  0.0553  0.0564  0.05
Milkina 1970   4  0.797  0.023  0.228  0.719  0.664  0.68
Mohovich 1999   28  0.6846  0.0022  0.1120  0.4320  0.3421  0.38
Nezu 2005   22  0.7031  0.0019  0.1419  0.4631  0.2024  0.30
Ohlsson 1999   16  0.7341  0.0020  0.1222  0.3723  0.4020  0.38
Olejniczak 1990   35  0.6658  0.0036  0.1135  0.1139  0.0847  0.09
Osinska 1989   8  0.765  0.0310  0.225  0.7318  0.519  0.61
Perlemuter 1992   53  0.5718  0.0055  0.0653  0.066  0.3937  0.15
Poblocka 1999   19  0.7259  0.0024  0.0924  0.3728  0.2723  0.32
Rangell 2001   46  0.6248  0.0051  0.0650  0.0642  0.0759  0.06
Richter 1960   58  0.5529  0.0058  0.0649  0.0647  0.0657  0.06
Richter 1961   55  0.5743  0.0054  0.0557  0.0545  0.0662  0.05
Rosen 1989   43  0.6536  0.0043  0.0843  0.0842  0.0654  0.07
Rubinstein 1939   6  0.772  0.095  0.217  0.727  0.692  0.70
Rubinstein 1952   7  0.776  0.026  0.266  0.727  0.683  0.70
Rubinstein 1966   2  0.804  0.042  0.282  0.765  0.731  0.74
Rudanovskaya 2007   54  0.5756  0.0059  0.0648  0.0638  0.0658  0.06
Shebanova 2002   26  0.6947  0.0037  0.1136  0.1131  0.1738  0.14
Smith 1975   39  0.6612  0.0141  0.1234  0.1221  0.3831  0.21
Sztompka 1959   48  0.6142  0.0048  0.0558  0.0549  0.0663  0.05
Tanyel 1992   30  0.6821  0.0029  0.0828  0.2234  0.1236  0.16
Tsujii 2005   3  0.803  0.054  0.253  0.7621  0.4910  0.61
Uninsky 1959   15  0.7320  0.0018  0.1616  0.5712  0.4416  0.50
Vardi 1988   10  0.7513  0.019  0.199  0.676  0.636  0.65
Wasowski 1980   50  0.6049  0.0053  0.0654  0.0643  0.0655  0.06
Zimerman 1975   20  0.7238  0.0026  0.0926  0.2931  0.2426  0.26
Average   1  0.831  0.611  0.601  0.9031  0.2418  0.46
Random 1   66  -0.0166  0.0065  0.0266  0.027  0.4745  0.10
Random 2   67  -0.0467  0.0067  0.0167  0.0153  0.0467  0.02
Random 3   65  0.0054  0.0066  0.0265  0.028  0.4246  0.09

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).