Czerny 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		33	0.65	27	0.00	17	0.09	17	0.42	36	0.08	23	0.18
Ax 1995		10	0.71	52	0.00	14	0.10	14	0.46	34	0.12	18	0.23
Bacha 1998		51	0.58	43	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	23	0.37	31	0.14
Barbosa 1983		56	0.56	13	0.01	20	0.11	20	0.36	29	0.29	12	0.32
BenOr 1989		60	0.51	65	0.00	47	0.06	42	0.06	40	0.07	54	0.06
Biret 1990		42	0.62	33	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.07	43	0.06	56	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.65	37	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.15	33	0.16	28	0.15
Chiu 1999		45	0.61	41	0.00	55	0.07	36	0.07	31	0.23	35	0.13
Clidat 1994		41	0.63	53	0.00	42	0.04	62	0.04	35	0.10	53	0.06
Cohen 1997		63	0.42	51	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.05	65	0.04
Cortot 1951		64	0.34	32	0.00	64	0.06	41	0.06	21	0.25	40	0.12
Csalog 1996		34	0.65	31	0.00	44	0.05	52	0.05	35	0.08	52	0.06
Czerny 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		13	0.70	39	0.00	30	0.08	27	0.24	37	0.09	27	0.15
Falvay 1989		2	0.78	5	0.04	2	0.25	2	0.71	20	0.39	3	0.53
Fiorentino 1962		29	0.66	49	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.38	32	0.19	15	0.27
Fliere 1977		5	0.73	4	0.06	4	0.23	4	0.64	9	0.51	2	0.57
Fou 1978		15	0.70	2	0.07	3	0.22	7	0.59	16	0.57	1	0.58
Francois 1956		48	0.59	24	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	28	0.16	46	0.09
Goldenweiser 1946		54	0.58	44	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	28	0.21	44	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.49	54	0.00	45	0.05	55	0.05	19	0.36	37	0.13
Groot 1988		26	0.68	19	0.01	29	0.08	31	0.20	32	0.13	25	0.16
Hatto 1993		9	0.72	11	0.01	10	0.16	12	0.48	42	0.07	24	0.18
Hatto 1997		6	0.73	21	0.00	11	0.13	13	0.48	44	0.07	22	0.18
Horszowski 1983		47	0.60	57	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	21	0.25	42	0.11
Indjic 2001		7	0.73	46	0.00	12	0.13	11	0.48	38	0.09	19	0.21
Katin 1996		17	0.69	55	0.00	25	0.08	22	0.34	38	0.10	21	0.18
Kiepura 1999		57	0.53	18	0.01	40	0.04	63	0.04	24	0.30	41	0.11
Korecka 1992		59	0.52	50	0.00	61	0.05	44	0.05	46	0.06	58	0.05
Kushner 1990		62	0.45	63	0.00	57	0.05	43	0.05	64	0.03	62	0.04
Lilamand 2001		58	0.52	58	0.00	62	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.04	63	0.04
Luisada 1990		46	0.61	64	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.07	61	0.05
Luisada 2008		53	0.58	38	0.00	54	0.06	39	0.06	40	0.08	50	0.07
Lushtak 2004		20	0.69	9	0.02	7	0.17	6	0.60	19	0.45	4	0.52
Malcuzynski 1951		22	0.68	12	0.01	9	0.29	8	0.55	30	0.20	11	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.64	3	0.07	6	0.17	10	0.49	28	0.22	8	0.33
Magaloff 1977		50	0.58	60	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	23	0.25	43	0.11
Magin 1975		37	0.64	14	0.01	37	0.05	46	0.05	51	0.06	57	0.05
Meguri 1997		44	0.62	66	0.00	49	0.06	40	0.06	23	0.23	39	0.12
Milkina 1970		21	0.69	25	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.39	37	0.10	20	0.20
Mohovich 1999		18	0.69	45	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.23	37	0.08	34	0.14
Nezu 2005		40	0.63	26	0.00	24	0.07	28	0.24	46	0.07	36	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.68	34	0.00	38	0.05	49	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		36	0.65	20	0.00	34	0.10	34	0.10	45	0.07	48	0.08
Osinska 1989		4	0.73	7	0.03	8	0.20	5	0.62	26	0.31	6	0.44
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.58	47	0.00	59	0.05	50	0.05	26	0.15	45	0.09
Poblocka 1999		19	0.69	28	0.00	28	0.11	24	0.30	43	0.07	30	0.14
Rangell 2001		31	0.65	40	0.00	43	0.04	61	0.04	35	0.10	55	0.06
Richter 1960		24	0.68	6	0.03	22	0.07	26	0.24	16	0.46	9	0.33
Richter 1961		30	0.65	23	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.07	24	0.34	29	0.15
Rosen 1989		28	0.67	22	0.00	23	0.10	30	0.23	26	0.29	16	0.26
Rubinstein 1939		12	0.70	36	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.43	27	0.32	7	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.65	56	0.00	26	0.09	21	0.34	36	0.08	26	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.70	15	0.01	13	0.10	9	0.52	20	0.43	5	0.47
Rudanovskaya 2007		27	0.67	42	0.00	39	0.05	51	0.05	21	0.42	33	0.14
Shebanova 2002		8	0.72	30	0.00	27	0.09	23	0.31	24	0.26	13	0.28
Smith 1975		52	0.58	17	0.01	51	0.05	45	0.05	45	0.07	51	0.06
Sztompka 1959		39	0.63	8	0.02	41	0.05	56	0.05	47	0.06	59	0.05
Tanyel 1992		43	0.62	48	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.04	64	0.04
Tsujii 2005		3	0.77	35	0.00	5	0.25	3	0.64	34	0.10	17	0.25
Uninsky 1959		11	0.71	10	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.16	37	0.09	38	0.12
Vardi 1988		25	0.68	29	0.00	21	0.08	25	0.30	43	0.07	32	0.14
Wasowski 1980		55	0.57	61	0.00	56	0.07	37	0.07	37	0.07	49	0.07
Zimerman 1975		14	0.70	16	0.01	16	0.09	16	0.42	30	0.26	10	0.33
Average		1	0.80	1	0.52	1	0.52	1	0.83	40	0.09	14	0.27
Random 1		66	-0.02	59	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	14	0.36	47	0.08
Random 2		65	0.00	62	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	36	0.05	66	0.03
Random 3		67	-0.06	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	57	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).