Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.60	3	0.05	10	0.16	10	0.57	33	0.19	7	0.33
Ax 1995		32	0.45	40	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.05	53	0.07	39	0.06
Bacha 1998		42	0.42	28	0.00	41	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.05	57	0.04
Barbosa 1983		23	0.50	29	0.00	28	0.09	29	0.38	45	0.07	28	0.16
BenOr 1989		36	0.44	65	0.00	52	0.04	44	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04
Biret 1990		50	0.39	17	0.00	44	0.03	62	0.03	60	0.04	66	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		38	0.44	44	0.00	46	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.06	42	0.05
Chiu 1999		19	0.51	31	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.41	9	0.57	4	0.48
Clidat 1994		35	0.44	18	0.00	17	0.11	19	0.45	32	0.17	9	0.28
Cohen 1997		55	0.38	19	0.00	58	0.05	42	0.05	23	0.29	35	0.12
Cortot 1951		62	0.30	39	0.00	63	0.04	49	0.04	57	0.04	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		26	0.49	10	0.01	23	0.08	24	0.41	44	0.06	29	0.16
Czerny 1989		16	0.51	5	0.02	20	0.08	31	0.36	42	0.07	27	0.16
Ezaki 2006		15	0.52	34	0.00	30	0.15	23	0.41	48	0.06	25	0.16
Falvay 1989		3	0.60	15	0.00	5	0.21	5	0.67	60	0.05	22	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		47	0.40	27	0.00	40	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.04	65	0.03
Fliere 1977		20	0.51	25	0.00	24	0.08	20	0.44	48	0.06	26	0.16
Fou 1978		5	0.58	6	0.02	8	0.18	4	0.67	42	0.07	14	0.22
Francois 1956		58	0.36	61	0.00	43	0.04	52	0.04	51	0.06	52	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		56	0.37	4	0.02	49	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.06	41	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.41	48	0.00	47	0.04	55	0.04	41	0.07	50	0.05
Groot 1988		57	0.36	42	0.00	48	0.04	58	0.04	58	0.05	63	0.04
Hatto 1993		12	0.53	7	0.01	6	0.17	11	0.56	48	0.07	17	0.20
Hatto 1997		10	0.55	12	0.01	3	0.19	8	0.58	33	0.15	8	0.29
Horszowski 1983		54	0.38	43	0.00	42	0.04	50	0.04	10	0.45	34	0.13
Indjic 2001		13	0.53	16	0.00	7	0.21	12	0.55	51	0.06	23	0.18
Katin 1996		29	0.49	36	0.00	31	0.12	28	0.38	37	0.10	20	0.19
Kiepura 1999		43	0.42	57	0.00	56	0.04	45	0.04	62	0.04	53	0.04
Korecka 1992		59	0.35	58	0.00	61	0.05	41	0.05	60	0.05	45	0.05
Kushner 1990		11	0.54	53	0.00	18	0.13	14	0.52	46	0.07	21	0.19
Lilamand 2001		63	0.27	22	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	48	0.05	60	0.04
Luisada 1990		44	0.41	47	0.00	53	0.05	40	0.05	62	0.05	48	0.05
Luisada 2008		39	0.44	59	0.00	45	0.04	56	0.04	47	0.07	47	0.05
Lushtak 2004		18	0.51	26	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.47	61	0.05	30	0.15
Malcuzynski 1951		37	0.44	35	0.00	39	0.05	43	0.05	43	0.08	40	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.49	41	0.00	32	0.18	30	0.36	43	0.08	24	0.17
Magaloff 1977		61	0.30	23	0.00	60	0.04	54	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04
Magin 1975		53	0.38	45	0.00	59	0.04	53	0.04	59	0.05	56	0.04
Meguri 1997		49	0.39	49	0.00	38	0.05	39	0.05	58	0.04	59	0.04
Milkina 1970		24	0.50	52	0.00	16	0.12	13	0.52	51	0.07	19	0.19
Mohovich 1999		34	0.44	51	0.00	33	0.12	33	0.22	60	0.04	36	0.09
Nezu 2005		17	0.51	55	0.00	14	0.10	17	0.47	34	0.13	11	0.25
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.51	11	0.01	19	0.09	16	0.48	51	0.08	16	0.20
Olejniczak 1990		30	0.47	37	0.00	29	0.12	26	0.40	60	0.06	32	0.15
Osinska 1989		14	0.53	30	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.44	51	0.08	18	0.19
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.34	32	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.04
Poblocka 1999		45	0.41	50	0.00	54	0.04	51	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.04
Rangell 2001		6	0.58	9	0.01	4	0.15	3	0.67	5	0.73	2	0.70
Richter 1960		28	0.49	64	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.39	11	0.52	5	0.45
Richter 1961		25	0.49	8	0.01	11	0.14	15	0.48	6	0.59	3	0.53
Rosen 1989		40	0.44	63	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.07	61	0.04	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.39	62	0.00	50	0.04	48	0.04	53	0.06	44	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.42	56	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.06	56	0.05	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.40	60	0.00	55	0.05	37	0.05	56	0.05	46	0.05
Rudanovskaya 2007		33	0.45	2	0.05	13	0.10	32	0.27	18	0.41	6	0.33
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		52	0.39	33	0.00	51	0.04	47	0.04	55	0.06	43	0.05
Sztompka 1959		64	0.25	54	0.00	64	0.04	46	0.04	64	0.04	58	0.04
Tanyel 1992		22	0.50	46	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.43	57	0.05	31	0.15
Tsujii 2005		1	0.69	1	0.71	1	0.70	1	0.85	11	0.62	1	0.73
Uninsky 1959		9	0.55	21	0.00	15	0.10	9	0.57	40	0.08	15	0.21
Vardi 1988		8	0.56	24	0.00	12	0.12	7	0.58	36	0.10	12	0.24
Wasowski 1980		31	0.46	20	0.00	34	0.10	34	0.10	56	0.06	37	0.08
Zimerman 1975		7	0.58	13	0.01	9	0.15	6	0.63	42	0.09	13	0.24
Average		2	0.63	14	0.01	2	0.38	2	0.78	48	0.08	10	0.25
Random 1		67	-0.03	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	10	0.36	38	0.08
Random 2		65	0.05	38	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	3	0.63	33	0.14
Random 3		66	-0.03	66	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	47	0.04	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).