Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.51	59	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	57	0.04	64	0.05
Ax 1995		3	0.69	8	0.01	4	0.24	3	0.71	18	0.55	3	0.62
Bacha 1998		56	0.45	48	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.05
Barbosa 1983		49	0.50	43	0.00	49	0.08	38	0.08	42	0.07	57	0.07
BenOr 1989		19	0.61	25	0.00	15	0.09	17	0.47	29	0.24	20	0.34
Biret 1990		27	0.58	39	0.00	17	0.09	19	0.42	20	0.39	13	0.40
Brailowsky 1960		24	0.59	18	0.00	28	0.11	27	0.33	32	0.17	28	0.24
Chiu 1999		61	0.39	55	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	33	0.17	51	0.08
Clidat 1994		43	0.53	44	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	34	0.12	54	0.08
Cohen 1997		60	0.39	23	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	10	0.53	38	0.16
Cortot 1951		53	0.47	7	0.01	52	0.06	49	0.06	1	0.70	31	0.20
Csalog 1996		42	0.54	45	0.00	47	0.07	41	0.07	30	0.20	45	0.12
Czerny 1989		33	0.57	27	0.00	32	0.11	31	0.26	30	0.27	26	0.26
Ezaki 2006		38	0.55	16	0.00	43	0.08	37	0.08	40	0.07	56	0.07
Falvay 1989		9	0.65	9	0.01	7	0.21	6	0.66	33	0.19	15	0.35
Fiorentino 1962		7	0.66	10	0.01	8	0.20	8	0.64	20	0.38	8	0.49
Fliere 1977		31	0.58	3	0.04	12	0.10	15	0.47	15	0.37	11	0.42
Fou 1978		23	0.59	40	0.00	24	0.08	25	0.35	25	0.35	17	0.35
Francois 1956		40	0.55	38	0.00	33	0.12	32	0.23	24	0.29	27	0.26
Goldenweiser 1946		45	0.53	36	0.00	39	0.05	56	0.05	4	0.66	33	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.50	35	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	21	0.37	41	0.15
Groot 1988		16	0.61	11	0.01	16	0.12	13	0.54	19	0.42	9	0.48
Hatto 1993		12	0.64	28	0.00	14	0.10	12	0.55	27	0.39	10	0.46
Hatto 1997		14	0.63	52	0.00	18	0.10	16	0.47	30	0.23	22	0.33
Horszowski 1983		63	0.31	62	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	28	0.17	47	0.09
Indjic 2001		10	0.65	56	0.00	11	0.12	10	0.58	24	0.41	7	0.49
Katin 1996		25	0.59	34	0.00	31	0.10	29	0.31	42	0.09	36	0.17
Kiepura 1999		15	0.61	31	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.41	30	0.24	23	0.31
Korecka 1992		44	0.53	14	0.01	48	0.06	47	0.06	30	0.18	46	0.10
Kushner 1990		41	0.55	66	0.00	40	0.07	43	0.07	41	0.09	53	0.08
Lilamand 2001		64	0.31	41	0.00	64	0.05	57	0.05	49	0.05	62	0.05
Luisada 1990		34	0.57	20	0.00	37	0.09	36	0.09	38	0.10	49	0.09
Luisada 2008		36	0.56	37	0.00	41	0.07	44	0.07	30	0.34	40	0.15
Lushtak 2004		8	0.66	15	0.00	9	0.16	9	0.59	17	0.46	6	0.52
Malcuzynski 1951		2	0.72	2	0.11	2	0.41	2	0.75	10	0.58	2	0.66
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.67	17	0.00	3	0.21	7	0.66	19	0.45	5	0.54
Magaloff 1977		54	0.46	49	0.00	55	0.06	46	0.06	24	0.34	43	0.14
Magin 1975		18	0.61	26	0.00	26	0.10	23	0.37	24	0.34	16	0.35
Meguri 1997		48	0.50	46	0.00	38	0.07	42	0.07	7	0.53	32	0.19
Milkina 1970		28	0.58	12	0.01	30	0.08	30	0.31	40	0.11	34	0.18
Mohovich 1999		6	0.66	4	0.03	6	0.22	5	0.70	4	0.69	1	0.69
Nezu 2005		29	0.58	58	0.00	21	0.10	33	0.19	32	0.16	37	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.56	47	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.07	39	0.10	52	0.08
Olejniczak 1990		30	0.58	60	0.00	35	0.07	39	0.07	50	0.07	58	0.07
Osinska 1989		4	0.68	5	0.02	5	0.19	4	0.70	22	0.48	4	0.58
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.50	30	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	3	0.58	35	0.17
Poblocka 1999		21	0.59	32	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.42	27	0.42	12	0.42
Rangell 2001		52	0.47	21	0.00	54	0.06	48	0.06	29	0.36	42	0.15
Richter 1960		59	0.42	57	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	50	0.05	65	0.04
Richter 1961		62	0.38	33	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	35	0.07	60	0.05
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		35	0.57	50	0.00	20	0.11	24	0.35	27	0.39	14	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.57	24	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.34	32	0.17	29	0.24
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.59	22	0.00	29	0.10	28	0.32	31	0.17	30	0.23
Rudanovskaya 2007		58	0.43	53	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	24	0.33	44	0.13
Shebanova 2002		57	0.44	54	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	35	0.07	63	0.05
Smith 1975		17	0.61	51	0.00	22	0.09	18	0.43	27	0.27	18	0.34
Sztompka 1959		46	0.51	29	0.00	45	0.06	53	0.06	26	0.36	39	0.15
Tanyel 1992		13	0.63	19	0.00	10	0.12	14	0.54	31	0.21	19	0.34
Tsujii 2005		11	0.64	13	0.01	13	0.08	11	0.57	33	0.16	24	0.30
Uninsky 1959		20	0.60	6	0.01	23	0.08	22	0.40	31	0.18	25	0.27
Vardi 1988		39	0.55	65	0.00	36	0.09	35	0.09	39	0.09	48	0.09
Wasowski 1980		55	0.46	42	0.00	56	0.06	52	0.06	53	0.06	59	0.06
Zimerman 1975		22	0.59	64	0.00	34	0.12	34	0.12	50	0.07	50	0.09
Average		1	0.76	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.86	38	0.13	21	0.33
Random 1		65	0.00	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	13	0.33	55	0.08
Random 2		67	-0.05	63	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	51	0.04	66	0.02
Random 3		66	-0.02	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	56	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).