Czerny 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.51	31	0.00	52	0.06	43	0.06	49	0.05	65	0.05
Ax 1995		9	0.66	37	0.00	11	0.21	7	0.68	23	0.36	12	0.49
Bacha 1998		58	0.43	58	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	47	0.06	61	0.06
Barbosa 1983		26	0.60	8	0.01	23	0.10	25	0.33	10	0.43	17	0.38
BenOr 1989		31	0.58	63	0.00	35	0.11	34	0.11	52	0.08	53	0.09
Biret 1990		43	0.53	59	0.00	45	0.09	38	0.09	44	0.09	54	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.66	21	0.00	10	0.14	8	0.66	17	0.50	5	0.57
Chiu 1999		57	0.43	41	0.00	58	0.04	64	0.04	32	0.17	55	0.08
Clidat 1994		56	0.45	42	0.00	49	0.05	61	0.05	62	0.04	66	0.04
Cohen 1997		61	0.38	55	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	18	0.31	49	0.12
Cortot 1951		55	0.45	32	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	4	0.61	34	0.17
Csalog 1996		34	0.56	19	0.00	37	0.11	35	0.11	19	0.44	28	0.22
Czerny 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		20	0.61	38	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.20	26	0.31	24	0.25
Falvay 1989		3	0.70	12	0.01	4	0.37	4	0.74	20	0.45	4	0.58
Fiorentino 1962		21	0.61	34	0.00	18	0.13	15	0.55	32	0.20	21	0.33
Fliere 1977		19	0.61	33	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.50	13	0.41	14	0.45
Fou 1978		4	0.70	3	0.05	3	0.38	3	0.75	2	0.74	1	0.74
Francois 1956		48	0.50	56	0.00	40	0.06	45	0.06	48	0.07	64	0.06
Goldenweiser 1946		52	0.49	54	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	14	0.49	35	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		49	0.50	46	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	18	0.40	42	0.14
Groot 1988		17	0.61	7	0.01	6	0.14	13	0.56	15	0.50	8	0.53
Hatto 1993		15	0.61	4	0.02	12	0.14	19	0.51	29	0.26	18	0.36
Hatto 1997		16	0.61	11	0.01	20	0.10	18	0.52	29	0.24	19	0.35
Horszowski 1983		63	0.37	48	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	19	0.31	50	0.11
Indjic 2001		18	0.61	51	0.00	21	0.13	17	0.52	31	0.22	20	0.34
Katin 1996		30	0.58	47	0.00	30	0.09	24	0.34	34	0.12	30	0.20
Kiepura 1999		5	0.69	5	0.02	5	0.31	5	0.74	8	0.68	2	0.71
Korecka 1992		25	0.60	43	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.33	10	0.63	13	0.46
Kushner 1990		38	0.54	60	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	37	0.11	56	0.08
Lilamand 2001		64	0.30	57	0.00	64	0.05	50	0.05	32	0.11	59	0.07
Luisada 1990		50	0.50	66	0.00	50	0.04	62	0.04	43	0.09	62	0.06
Luisada 2008		53	0.47	25	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	37	0.11	60	0.07
Lushtak 2004		12	0.64	22	0.00	14	0.11	14	0.56	14	0.50	7	0.53
Malcuzynski 1951		10	0.65	27	0.00	7	0.14	9	0.64	28	0.25	16	0.40
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.72	2	0.20	2	0.38	2	0.79	8	0.63	3	0.71
Magaloff 1977		54	0.46	61	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	20	0.40	41	0.14
Magin 1975		22	0.61	20	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.29	33	0.17	27	0.22
Meguri 1997		51	0.49	53	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	19	0.41	40	0.14
Milkina 1970		23	0.60	17	0.00	22	0.19	21	0.50	37	0.11	26	0.23
Mohovich 1999		44	0.52	49	0.00	41	0.06	47	0.06	39	0.07	63	0.06
Nezu 2005		29	0.58	15	0.00	36	0.09	37	0.09	31	0.19	47	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		35	0.56	29	0.00	39	0.08	40	0.08	34	0.13	51	0.10
Olejniczak 1990		14	0.64	13	0.01	13	0.11	12	0.57	16	0.48	9	0.52
Osinska 1989		7	0.67	9	0.01	8	0.12	6	0.69	27	0.35	10	0.49
Perlemuter 1992		62	0.38	44	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	18	0.32	44	0.13
Poblocka 1999		27	0.60	14	0.00	34	0.09	36	0.09	42	0.09	52	0.09
Rangell 2001		45	0.52	40	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	26	0.44	39	0.15
Richter 1960		39	0.54	23	0.00	44	0.08	41	0.08	4	0.62	29	0.22
Richter 1961		60	0.41	26	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	25	0.30	48	0.12
Rosen 1989		32	0.57	24	0.00	24	0.11	30	0.27	31	0.26	23	0.26
Rubinstein 1939		37	0.56	35	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.18	33	0.19	31	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.56	64	0.00	25	0.08	28	0.30	43	0.09	37	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.60	62	0.00	26	0.10	23	0.35	42	0.09	32	0.18
Rudanovskaya 2007		59	0.41	50	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	25	0.33	46	0.13
Shebanova 2002		46	0.51	18	0.00	53	0.07	42	0.07	31	0.36	36	0.16
Smith 1975		40	0.54	10	0.01	27	0.09	27	0.33	29	0.26	22	0.29
Sztompka 1959		42	0.53	36	0.00	38	0.08	39	0.08	29	0.29	38	0.15
Tanyel 1992		24	0.60	16	0.00	16	0.13	22	0.43	48	0.07	33	0.17
Tsujii 2005		13	0.64	28	0.00	17	0.13	16	0.53	35	0.12	25	0.25
Uninsky 1959		6	0.68	6	0.02	9	0.14	10	0.64	20	0.46	6	0.54
Vardi 1988		33	0.57	39	0.00	31	0.10	31	0.23	48	0.07	45	0.13
Wasowski 1980		41	0.54	45	0.00	42	0.06	46	0.06	27	0.30	43	0.13
Zimerman 1975		11	0.65	30	0.00	15	0.14	11	0.60	24	0.32	15	0.44
Average		1	0.77	1	0.56	1	0.55	1	0.89	28	0.27	11	0.49
Random 1		66	-0.02	65	0.00	66	0.02	65	0.02	12	0.33	58	0.08
Random 2		65	0.04	52	0.00	65	0.02	66	0.02	17	0.35	57	0.08
Random 3		67	-0.05	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	63	0.02	67	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).