Fiorentino 1962

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.52	63	0.00	49	0.08	43	0.08	38	0.07	54	0.07
Ax 1995		3	0.75	4	0.04	4	0.34	3	0.81	3	0.80	3	0.80
Bacha 1998		38	0.58	9	0.01	34	0.13	34	0.13	1	0.75	30	0.31
Barbosa 1983		44	0.55	29	0.00	45	0.07	51	0.07	31	0.13	50	0.10
BenOr 1989		16	0.65	32	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.43	15	0.54	17	0.48
Biret 1990		37	0.58	26	0.00	37	0.15	33	0.15	18	0.40	36	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.68	24	0.00	12	0.23	13	0.58	11	0.57	14	0.57
Chiu 1999		52	0.43	65	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	24	0.35	47	0.13
Clidat 1994		46	0.53	59	0.00	47	0.10	40	0.10	22	0.31	42	0.18
Cohen 1997		63	0.20	61	0.00	63	0.05	54	0.05	62	0.04	63	0.04
Cortot 1951		56	0.40	64	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	6	0.56	46	0.17
Csalog 1996		28	0.62	42	0.00	33	0.10	39	0.10	4	0.71	32	0.27
Czerny 1989		29	0.61	45	0.00	31	0.10	31	0.20	14	0.55	28	0.33
Ezaki 2006		17	0.65	10	0.01	28	0.11	24	0.31	8	0.55	20	0.41
Falvay 1989		5	0.72	3	0.10	3	0.31	5	0.69	7	0.60	9	0.64
Fiorentino 1962		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fliere 1977		43	0.56	21	0.00	24	0.09	26	0.28	9	0.45	26	0.35
Fou 1978		27	0.62	46	0.00	29	0.11	23	0.32	22	0.43	25	0.37
Francois 1956		35	0.59	40	0.00	35	0.12	36	0.12	6	0.50	37	0.24
Goldenweiser 1946		51	0.46	53	0.00	51	0.13	35	0.13	11	0.52	33	0.26
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.48	22	0.00	50	0.08	46	0.08	18	0.39	44	0.18
Groot 1988		10	0.70	12	0.01	8	0.20	10	0.63	3	0.71	6	0.67
Hatto 1993		6	0.72	23	0.00	6	0.19	8	0.65	10	0.65	8	0.65
Hatto 1997		11	0.69	14	0.01	13	0.15	11	0.60	12	0.60	11	0.60
Horszowski 1983		62	0.33	50	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	21	0.22	51	0.09
Indjic 2001		7	0.72	27	0.00	7	0.18	4	0.71	9	0.66	5	0.68
Katin 1996		21	0.64	41	0.00	27	0.11	21	0.36	17	0.45	22	0.40
Kiepura 1999		14	0.67	17	0.00	14	0.13	14	0.53	9	0.66	12	0.59
Korecka 1992		33	0.59	54	0.00	39	0.08	47	0.08	11	0.62	39	0.22
Kushner 1990		42	0.56	47	0.00	40	0.07	48	0.07	34	0.13	49	0.10
Lilamand 2001		60	0.36	43	0.00	62	0.07	52	0.07	53	0.05	56	0.06
Luisada 1990		30	0.61	19	0.00	38	0.07	50	0.07	21	0.46	43	0.18
Luisada 2008		39	0.58	49	0.00	43	0.12	37	0.12	28	0.40	40	0.22
Lushtak 2004		26	0.62	13	0.01	25	0.09	25	0.30	24	0.27	31	0.28
Malcuzynski 1951		1	0.80	1	0.49	1	0.48	1	0.87	2	0.85	1	0.86
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.77	2	0.20	2	0.52	2	0.84	2	0.79	2	0.81
Magaloff 1977		45	0.54	37	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	4	0.71	35	0.24
Magin 1975		23	0.64	31	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.25	16	0.49	27	0.35
Meguri 1997		59	0.38	51	0.00	52	0.05	58	0.05	55	0.04	61	0.04
Milkina 1970		22	0.64	25	0.00	16	0.10	16	0.52	25	0.31	21	0.40
Mohovich 1999		48	0.52	57	0.00	44	0.07	49	0.07	35	0.08	53	0.07
Nezu 2005		25	0.63	34	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	24	0.41	34	0.26
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.60	44	0.00	41	0.09	42	0.09	36	0.11	48	0.10
Olejniczak 1990		8	0.71	5	0.02	9	0.18	7	0.68	4	0.67	7	0.67
Osinska 1989		9	0.70	7	0.01	11	0.19	9	0.65	13	0.57	10	0.61
Perlemuter 1992		58	0.39	30	0.00	61	0.07	53	0.07	33	0.06	55	0.06
Poblocka 1999		24	0.63	35	0.00	21	0.08	27	0.28	19	0.55	23	0.39
Rangell 2001		54	0.42	20	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	38	0.06	60	0.05
Richter 1960		53	0.42	62	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	36	0.07	58	0.05
Richter 1961		61	0.36	55	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.06	57	0.05
Rosen 1989		15	0.66	15	0.01	18	0.12	19	0.38	7	0.64	16	0.49
Rubinstein 1939		41	0.57	28	0.00	20	0.09	29	0.26	17	0.53	24	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.59	33	0.00	23	0.09	28	0.27	19	0.39	29	0.32
Rubinstein 1966		20	0.64	6	0.02	15	0.14	15	0.53	12	0.51	15	0.52
Rudanovskaya 2007		57	0.39	48	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	40	0.06	59	0.05
Shebanova 2002		55	0.40	36	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.03	64	0.03
Smith 1975		4	0.72	16	0.01	5	0.34	6	0.69	1	0.78	4	0.73
Sztompka 1959		49	0.52	38	0.00	48	0.08	44	0.08	22	0.38	45	0.17
Tanyel 1992		18	0.65	18	0.00	19	0.12	17	0.48	24	0.38	18	0.43
Tsujii 2005		19	0.65	8	0.01	26	0.09	20	0.37	36	0.10	41	0.19
Uninsky 1959		31	0.60	52	0.00	36	0.11	38	0.11	38	0.08	52	0.09
Vardi 1988		36	0.59	11	0.01	22	0.08	22	0.34	17	0.53	19	0.42
Wasowski 1980		40	0.58	58	0.00	42	0.09	41	0.09	13	0.57	38	0.23
Zimerman 1975		12	0.69	39	0.00	10	0.15	12	0.60	12	0.58	13	0.59
Random 1		65	-0.04	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	52	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		66	-0.09	56	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	61	0.03	65	0.02
Random 3		64	0.00	60	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	40	0.05	62	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).